GOOD vs CLB
Comparison between Gladstone Commercial Corp (GOOD, Company) and Core Laboratories Inc (CLB, Company).
GOOD is from the Real Estate sector, while CLB is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceGOOD has outperformed CLB, delivering a return of -3.4% compared to -22.6%
GOOD vs CLB - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
GOOD vs CLB - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
GOOD vs CLB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | GOOD | CLB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +21.17% | -22.32% |
| 2025 | -27.71% | -11.95% |
| 2024 | +33.12% | -0.80% |
| 2023 | -22.93% | -7.33% |
| 2022 | -21.83% | -16.88% |
| 2021 | +56.45% | -19.29% |
| 2020 | -7.47% | -30.42% |
| 2019 | +30.45% | -34.57% |
| 2018 | -6.71% | -45.70% |
| 2017 | +11.63% | -8.10% |
| 2016 | +53.74% | +14.09% |
| 2015 | -7.62% | -7.01% |
| 2014 | +4.17% | -35.33% |
| 2013 | +7.43% | +71.69% |
| 2012 | +10.39% | -4.52% |
| 2011 | +0.80% | +28.72% |
| 2010 | +53.14% | +47.40% |
| 2009 | +68.57% | +85.09% |
| 2008 | -46.07% | -51.75% |
| 2007 | -6.25% | +60.64% |
| 2006 | +31.90% | +109.84% |
| 2005 | +1.83% | +63.64% |
| 2004 | +6.14% | +38.66% |
| 2003 | +13.16% | +44.75% |
| 2002 | N/A | -21.72% |
| 2001 | N/A | -45.55% |
| 2000 | N/A | +41.87% |
| 1999 | N/A | +9.59% |
GOOD vs CLB Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for GOOD was -67.15%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 869 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CLB was -95.78%, occurring on Mar 17, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current GOOD drawdown is -28.60%. The current CLB drawdown is -92.96%.
| Rank | GOOD | CLB |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -67.15% Oct 27, 2006 - Apr 14, 2010 | -95.78% Apr 21, 2014 - Mar 17, 2020 |
| #2 | -66.25% Nov 1, 2019 - Apr 29, 2021 | -74.19% Apr 3, 2000 - Jul 29, 2005 |
| #3 | -53.23% Dec 31, 2021 - May 16, 2023 | -65.25% Nov 6, 2007 - Apr 22, 2010 |
| #4 | -26.07% Mar 20, 2015 - Apr 25, 2016 | -31.21% May 2, 2012 - Apr 22, 2013 |
| #5 | -25.84% Nov 29, 2017 - Feb 20, 2019 | -29.26% May 5, 2006 - Jul 27, 2006 |
| #6 | -22.75% May 31, 2011 - Jan 30, 2012 | -27.02% Sep 5, 2006 - Nov 14, 2006 |
| #7 | -15.90% May 17, 2013 - Feb 27, 2015 | -26.37% Jul 15, 2011 - Dec 1, 2011 |
| #8 | -14.43% Apr 26, 2010 - Jun 25, 2010 | -20.07% Dec 8, 2006 - Apr 25, 2007 |
| #9 | -13.35% Feb 3, 2012 - Aug 29, 2012 | -18.95% Nov 19, 1999 - Mar 1, 2000 |
| #10 | -13.21% Sep 23, 2016 - Nov 16, 2016 | -15.49% Sep 7, 2005 - Nov 1, 2005 |
| #11 | -12.59% Apr 18, 2017 - Sep 26, 2017 | -15.11% Apr 26, 2010 - Jun 18, 2010 |
| #12 | -11.64% Apr 4, 2006 - Aug 23, 2006 | -14.26% Mar 7, 2000 - Mar 31, 2000 |
| #13 | -10.68% Jun 25, 2010 - Oct 5, 2010 | -13.63% Oct 18, 2010 - Dec 7, 2010 |
| #14 | -10.44% Dec 23, 2004 - Aug 31, 2005 | -13.09% Apr 4, 2011 - Jun 20, 2011 |
| #15 | -10.20% Sep 24, 2012 - Jan 10, 2013 | -11.32% Aug 10, 2007 - Sep 5, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between GOOD and CLB is -0.10 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2003 - 2026)
GOOD vs CLB dividend yield comparison.
| Year | GOOD | CLB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.99% | 0.15% |
| 2025 | 11.25% | 0.25% |
| 2024 | 7.39% | 0.23% |
| 2023 | 9.06% | 0.23% |
| 2022 | 8.13% | 0.20% |
| 2021 | 5.83% | 0.18% |
| 2020 | 8.35% | 1.06% |
| 2019 | 6.86% | 5.84% |
| 2018 | 8.37% | 3.69% |
| 2017 | 7.12% | 2.01% |
| 2016 | 7.46% | 1.83% |
| 2015 | 10.28% | 2.02% |
| 2014 | 8.74% | 1.66% |
| 2013 | 8.35% | 0.67% |
| 2012 | 8.36% | 1.02% |
| 2011 | 8.55% | 0.88% |
| 2010 | 7.97% | 1.00% |
| 2009 | 11.19% | 0.97% |
| 2008 | 17.65% | 2.67% |
| 2007 | 8.21% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 7.15% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 5.82% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 2.81% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 0.06% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks