CLB vs RGR
Comparison between Core Laboratories Inc (CLB, Company) and Sturm Ruger & Co. Inc (RGR, Company).
CLB is from the Energy sector, while RGR is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceRGR has outperformed CLB, delivering a return of -9.3% compared to -22.6%
CLB vs RGR - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CLB vs RGR - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CLB vs RGR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CLB | RGR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -22.32% | +18.49% |
| 2025 | -11.95% | -4.76% |
| 2024 | -0.80% | -20.21% |
| 2023 | -7.33% | -10.53% |
| 2022 | -16.88% | -16.59% |
| 2021 | -19.29% | +6.13% |
| 2020 | -30.42% | +49.71% |
| 2019 | -34.57% | -11.43% |
| 2018 | -45.70% | -4.81% |
| 2017 | -8.10% | +7.12% |
| 2016 | +14.09% | -11.80% |
| 2015 | -7.01% | +74.22% |
| 2014 | -35.33% | -51.68% |
| 2013 | +71.69% | +65.20% |
| 2012 | -4.52% | +48.44% |
| 2011 | +28.72% | +125.49% |
| 2010 | +47.40% | +52.64% |
| 2009 | +85.09% | +58.94% |
| 2008 | -51.75% | -28.76% |
| 2007 | +60.64% | -13.75% |
| 2006 | +109.84% | +36.75% |
| 2005 | +63.64% | -17.66% |
| 2004 | +38.66% | -18.33% |
| 2003 | +44.75% | +24.84% |
| 2002 | -21.72% | -13.76% |
| 2001 | -45.55% | +37.95% |
| 2000 | +41.87% | +15.29% |
| 1999 | +9.59% | +0.86% |
CLB vs RGR Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CLB was -95.78%, occurring on Mar 17, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for RGR was -79.69%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 912 trading sessions.
The current CLB drawdown is -92.96%. The current RGR drawdown is -45.83%.
| Rank | CLB | RGR |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -95.78% Apr 21, 2014 - Mar 17, 2020 | -79.69% Aug 7, 2007 - Mar 21, 2011 |
| #2 | -74.19% Apr 3, 2000 - Jul 29, 2005 | -60.65% Jun 30, 2021 - Nov 20, 2025 |
| #3 | -65.25% Nov 6, 2007 - Apr 22, 2010 | -58.67% Jan 16, 2014 - Jun 30, 2020 |
| #4 | -31.21% May 2, 2012 - Apr 22, 2013 | -57.09% Apr 7, 2004 - Mar 20, 2007 |
| #5 | -29.26% May 5, 2006 - Jul 27, 2006 | -39.73% May 28, 2002 - Feb 10, 2004 |
| #6 | -27.02% Sep 5, 2006 - Nov 14, 2006 | -38.89% May 2, 2012 - Nov 27, 2012 |
| #7 | -26.37% Jul 15, 2011 - Dec 1, 2011 | -30.68% Aug 30, 2011 - Jan 5, 2012 |
| #8 | -20.07% Dec 8, 2006 - Apr 25, 2007 | -28.36% May 24, 2000 - Jan 4, 2001 |
| #9 | -18.95% Nov 19, 1999 - Mar 1, 2000 | -28.07% Aug 10, 2020 - Jun 21, 2021 |
| #10 | -15.49% Sep 7, 2005 - Nov 1, 2005 | -26.29% Nov 29, 2012 - Feb 8, 2013 |
| #11 | -15.11% Apr 26, 2010 - Jun 18, 2010 | -20.72% Apr 29, 2011 - Jul 22, 2011 |
| #12 | -14.26% Mar 7, 2000 - Mar 31, 2000 | -19.15% Mar 4, 2013 - Sep 10, 2013 |
| #13 | -13.63% Oct 18, 2010 - Dec 7, 2010 | -15.98% Jan 19, 2000 - May 24, 2000 |
| #14 | -13.09% Apr 4, 2011 - Jun 20, 2011 | -15.73% Oct 15, 2001 - Mar 4, 2002 |
| #15 | -11.32% Aug 10, 2007 - Sep 5, 2007 | -15.51% Jan 16, 2001 - Sep 24, 2001 |
Correlation
Correlation between CLB and RGR is 0.31 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CLB vs RGR dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CLB | RGR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.15% | 0.48% |
| 2025 | 0.25% | 1.90% |
| 2024 | 0.23% | 1.95% |
| 2023 | 0.23% | 2.79% |
| 2022 | 0.20% | 14.66% |
| 2021 | 0.18% | 4.94% |
| 2020 | 1.06% | 10.00% |
| 2019 | 5.84% | 1.74% |
| 2018 | 3.69% | 2.07% |
| 2017 | 2.01% | 2.44% |
| 2016 | 1.83% | 3.28% |
| 2015 | 2.02% | 1.85% |
| 2014 | 1.66% | 4.68% |
| 2013 | 0.67% | 2.91% |
| 2012 | 1.02% | 12.76% |
| 2011 | 0.88% | 1.29% |
| 2010 | 1.00% | 2.16% |
| 2009 | 0.97% | 3.14% |
| 2008 | 2.67% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 4.28% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 6.64% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 7.04% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 8.36% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 6.68% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 8.47% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 2.25% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks