GIGB vs MOO

Comparison between GOLDMAN SACHS ACCESS INVESTMENT GRADE CORPORATE BOND ETF (GIGB, ETF) and VANECK AGRIBUSINESS ETF (MOO, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceMOO has outperformed GIGB, delivering a return of +1.2% compared to -0.2%

GIGB vs MOO - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	GIGB(ETF)	MOO(ETF)
Net Assets	$971M	$975M
Expense Ratio	0.08%	0.56%
Max Drawdown	26.20%	69.53%
Sharpe Ratio	-0.41	0.93
5Y Beta	0.13	0.50
P/E Ratio	N/A	22.93
Forward P/E	N/A	16.21
PEG Ratio	N/A	0.21
5Y Dividends CAGR	8.70%	18.30%
Debt to Equity	N/A	57.98%
P/S Ratio	N/A	0.90
P/B Ratio	N/A	2.07

Net Assets

GIGB

$971M

Winner

MOO

$975M

Expense Ratio

Winner

GIGB

0.08%

MOO

0.56%

Max Drawdown

Winner

GIGB

26.20%

MOO

69.53%

Sharpe Ratio

GIGB

-0.41

Winner

MOO

0.93

5Y Beta

Winner

GIGB

0.13

MOO

0.50

P/E Ratio

GIGB

N/A

MOO

22.93

Forward P/E

GIGB

N/A

MOO

16.21

PEG Ratio

GIGB

N/A

MOO

0.21

5Y Dividends CAGR

GIGB

8.70%

Winner

MOO

18.30%

Debt to Equity

GIGB

N/A

MOO

57.98%

P/S Ratio

GIGB

N/A

MOO

0.90

P/B Ratio

GIGB

N/A

MOO

2.07

GIGB vs MOO - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	GIGB	MOO
1 month	-0.27%	+3.70%
3 months	-0.38%	+5.88%
6 months	-1.82%	-0.83%
1 year	+2.28%	+17.14%
5 years(CAGR)	-0.24%	+1.24%
10 years(CAGR)	+2.33%	+7.47%
Max(CAGR)	+2.33%	+5.72%

GIGB

-0.27%

Winner

MOO

+3.70%

GIGB

-0.38%

Winner

MOO

+5.88%

GIGB

-1.82%

Winner

MOO

-0.83%

GIGB

+2.28%

Winner

MOO

+17.14%

5Y(CAGR)

GIGB

-0.24%

Winner

MOO

+1.24%

10Y(CAGR)

GIGB

+2.33%

Winner

MOO

+7.47%

Max(CAGR)

GIGB

+2.33%

Winner

MOO

+5.72%

GIGB vs MOO - Annual Returns (2007 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	GIGB	MOO
2026	-0.35%	+15.62%
2025	+7.46%	+15.58%
2024	+2.27%	-12.50%
2023	+8.15%	-7.83%
2022	-15.06%	-7.72%
2021	-1.24%	+24.09%
2020	+9.59%	+14.10%
2019	+15.00%	+22.54%
2018	-2.38%	-6.98%
2017	+2.44%	+21.38%
2016	N/A	+14.26%
2015	N/A	-8.82%
2014	N/A	+0.86%
2013	N/A	+2.62%
2012	N/A	+10.70%
2011	N/A	-11.98%
2010	N/A	+20.29%
2009	N/A	+50.15%
2008	N/A	-50.62%
2007	N/A	+39.44%

GIGB vs MOO Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for GIGB was -22.25%, occurring on Oct 20, 2022. Recovery took 1104 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for MOO was -69.53%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 2291 trading sessions.

The current GIGB drawdown is -1.96%. The current MOO drawdown is -12.29%.

Rank	GIGB	MOO
#1	-22.25% Sep 22, 2021 - Feb 17, 2026	-69.53% Jun 17, 2008 - Jul 24, 2017
#2	-19.64% Mar 6, 2020 - Jun 10, 2020	-39.51% Apr 20, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025
#3	-5.78% Dec 31, 2020 - Aug 4, 2021	-36.75% Jan 13, 2020 - Sep 2, 2020
#4	-4.30% Dec 29, 2017 - Jan 31, 2019	-17.82% Jan 14, 2008 - Apr 15, 2008
#5	-2.98% Aug 6, 2020 - Dec 30, 2020	-16.95% Oct 3, 2018 - Jun 19, 2019
#6	-2.87% Feb 26, 2026 - Mar 27, 2026	-11.26% Nov 6, 2007 - Dec 5, 2007
#7	-2.55% Aug 28, 2019 - Oct 4, 2019	-9.92% Apr 21, 2008 - Jun 17, 2008
#8	-1.57% Aug 4, 2021 - Sep 22, 2021	-9.28% Jan 26, 2018 - Sep 20, 2018
#9	-1.40% Oct 4, 2019 - Nov 26, 2019	-7.05% Nov 5, 2021 - Jan 12, 2022
#10	-1.23% Jul 3, 2019 - Aug 1, 2019	-6.41% May 7, 2021 - Oct 19, 2021
#11	-1.02% Jun 10, 2020 - Jun 15, 2020	-6.07% Jul 23, 2019 - Nov 4, 2019
#12	-0.99% Sep 7, 2017 - Nov 22, 2017	-5.70% Dec 10, 2007 - Dec 21, 2007
#13	-0.92% Jun 26, 2017 - Jul 18, 2017	-5.54% Oct 12, 2020 - Nov 5, 2020
#14	-0.70% Dec 15, 2017 - Dec 29, 2017	-5.48% Jan 20, 2021 - Feb 5, 2021
#15	-0.65% Aug 3, 2017 - Aug 31, 2017	-5.31% Jan 12, 2022 - Feb 9, 2022

Correlation

Correlation between GIGB and MOO is 0.48 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.

0.48

-101

Dividend Comparison (2008 - 2026)

GIGB vs MOO dividend yield comparison.

Year	GIGB	MOO
2026	2.71%	0.00%
2025	4.69%	2.47%
2024	4.45%	3.41%
2023	3.67%	2.93%
2022	3.12%	2.15%
2021	2.25%	1.17%
2020	2.62%	1.10%
2019	3.22%	1.26%
2018	3.31%	1.69%
2017	1.55%	1.44%
2016	0.00%	2.14%
2015	0.00%	2.89%
2014	0.00%	3.21%
2013	0.00%	1.91%
2012	0.00%	1.84%
2011	0.00%	0.64%
2010	0.00%	0.61%
2009	0.00%	0.96%
2008	0.00%	1.01%