StockComparison Logo
vs

FTS vs NMR

Comparison between Fortis Inc (FTS, Company) and Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company).

FTS is from the Utilities sector, while NMR is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed FTS, delivering a return of +18.6% compared to +10.0%

FTS vs NMR - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
FTS
$29B
NMR
$29B
Max Drawdown
Winner
FTS
34.36%
NMR
91.09%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
FTS
1.64
NMR
1.61
5Y Beta
Winner
FTS
-0.04
NMR
1.24
Industry
FTS
Utilities - Regulated Electric
NMR
Capital Markets
P/E Ratio
FTS
20.43
Winner
NMR
12.77
Forward P/E
FTS
22.78
Winner
NMR
15.38
PEG Ratio
Winner
FTS
1.93
NMR
5.60
Dividend Yield
Winner
FTS
4.35%
NMR
3.32%
5Y Dividends CAGR
FTS
7.87%
NMR
N/A
5Y EPS CAGR
FTS
3.80%
Winner
NMR
15.09%
Debt to Equity
Winner
FTS
142.25%
NMR
466.51%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
FTS
-4.69%
NMR
-25.88%
P/S Ratio
FTS
2.40
Winner
NMR
0.01
P/B Ratio
FTS
1.82
Winner
NMR
1.23

FTS vs NMR - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
FTS
+2.70%
Winner
NMR
+9.88%
3M
FTS
+4.12%
Winner
NMR
+13.18%
6M
Winner
FTS
+14.86%
NMR
+7.39%
1Y
FTS
+28.61%
Winner
NMR
+62.14%
5Y(CAGR)
FTS
+9.98%
Winner
NMR
+18.64%
10Y(CAGR)
FTS
+9.97%
Winner
NMR
+11.86%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
FTS
+12.35%
NMR
+0.09%

FTS vs NMR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearFTSNMR
2026+14.93%+18.06%
2025+30.22%+53.57%
2024+5.99%+35.63%
2023+6.17%+21.20%
2022-12.70%-12.30%
2021+22.76%-17.05%
2020+2.27%+3.34%
2019+30.07%+35.43%
2018-5.13%-36.95%
2017+25.09%-0.51%
2016+23.55%+10.26%
2015N/A+0.64%
2014N/A-23.82%
2013N/A+29.46%
2012N/A+92.81%
2011N/A-52.04%
2010N/A-14.33%
2009N/A-11.17%
2008N/A-49.10%
2007N/A-11.80%
2006N/A-1.99%
2005N/A+34.20%
2004N/A-14.69%
2003N/A+52.55%
2002N/A-13.30%
2001N/A-29.05%
2000N/A+2.57%
1999N/A+11.76%

FTS vs NMR Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for FTS was -34.36%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 271 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current NMR drawdown is -51.09%.

RankFTSNMR
#1-34.36%
Feb 18, 2020 - Mar 16, 2021
-89.30%
Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011
#2-29.96%
Apr 6, 2022 - Mar 31, 2025
-20.52%
Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000
#3-16.05%
Nov 24, 2017 - Mar 12, 2019
-11.59%
Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000
#4-14.04%
Jul 6, 2016 - Apr 12, 2017
-11.04%
Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000
#5-13.81%
Feb 4, 2016 - Mar 7, 2016
-4.76%
Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999
#6-7.75%
Jan 13, 2016 - Jan 22, 2016
-4.45%
Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000
#7-7.63%
Sep 26, 2019 - Jan 15, 2020
-4.04%
Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000
#8-6.63%
May 7, 2025 - Aug 1, 2025
-3.28%
Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000
#9-6.49%
Dec 31, 2021 - Mar 17, 2022
-2.21%
Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999
#10-6.21%
Mar 16, 2026 - Jun 26, 2026
-0.87%
Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000
#11-6.13%
Apr 3, 2025 - Apr 14, 2025
N/A
#12-5.83%
Sep 8, 2017 - Nov 6, 2017
N/A
#13-5.77%
Aug 16, 2021 - Dec 14, 2021
N/A
#14-5.39%
Jun 15, 2021 - Aug 16, 2021
N/A
#15-4.76%
Apr 17, 2017 - Jun 5, 2017
N/A

Correlation

Correlation between FTS and NMR is 0.64 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.64
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

FTS vs NMR dividend yield comparison.

YearFTSNMR
20261.60%1.53%
20253.42%4.91%
20244.62%4.29%
20234.50%1.20%
20224.48%3.86%
20213.40%0.00%
20203.54%0.86%
20193.31%0.00%
20183.35%0.00%
20174.43%1.70%
20164.94%1.79%
20150.00%3.34%
20140.00%2.44%
20130.00%1.77%
20120.00%1.28%
20110.00%5.11%
20100.00%1.37%
20090.00%0.57%
20080.00%2.85%
20060.00%2.36%
20050.00%1.07%
20040.00%1.08%
20030.00%1.03%
20020.00%1.05%
20010.00%5.57%
20000.00%6.49%

Select Stocks to Compare