StockComparison Logo
vs

FTI vs BAP

Comparison between TechnipFMC plc (FTI, Company) and Credicorp Ltd (BAP, Company).

FTI is from the Energy sector, while BAP is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceFTI has outperformed BAP, delivering a return of +48.1% compared to +30.9%

FTI vs BAP - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
FTI
$28B
Winner
BAP
$28B
Max Drawdown
FTI
92.11%
Winner
BAP
64.93%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
FTI
2.36
BAP
1.81
5Y Beta
FTI
1.14
Winner
BAP
0.67
Industry
FTI
Oil & Gas Equipment & Services
BAP
Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio
FTI
26.10
Winner
BAP
13.50
Forward P/E
FTI
25.25
Winner
BAP
12.64
PEG Ratio
FTI
0.70
Winner
BAP
0.40
Dividend Yield
FTI
0.28%
Winner
BAP
3.86%
5Y EPS CAGR
FTI
29.06%
Winner
BAP
42.63%
Debt to Equity
Winner
FTI
12.50%
BAP
80.93%
Free Cash Flow Yield
FTI
4.82%
Winner
BAP
6.74%
P/S Ratio
FTI
2.67
Winner
BAP
1.33
P/B Ratio
FTI
8.15
Winner
BAP
2.54

FTI vs BAP - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
FTI
-3.24%
Winner
BAP
+19.49%
3M
FTI
+13.36%
Winner
BAP
+18.99%
6M
Winner
FTI
+53.01%
BAP
+36.96%
1Y
Winner
FTI
+104.89%
BAP
+77.12%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
FTI
+48.09%
BAP
+30.90%
10Y(CAGR)
FTI
+14.44%
Winner
BAP
+14.62%
Max(CAGR)
FTI
+12.70%
Winner
BAP
+17.88%

FTI vs BAP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearFTIBAP
2026+49.80%+35.10%
2025+51.60%+64.72%
2024+45.43%+32.49%
2023+75.27%+14.25%
2022+91.37%+12.39%
2021-19.14%-21.66%
2020-55.02%-20.35%
2019+10.88%-2.35%
2018-37.42%+5.74%
2017-13.54%+34.80%
2016+21.59%+69.45%
2015-37.64%-38.03%
2014-8.60%+24.00%
2013+20.02%-9.54%
2012-18.17%+36.81%
2011+18.70%-6.73%
2010+50.11%+56.14%
2009+128.44%+56.69%
2008-56.13%-32.22%
2007+92.04%+87.36%
2006+34.15%+75.55%
2005+40.22%+51.20%
2004+38.20%+21.81%
2003+12.56%+44.34%
2002+23.82%+10.25%
2001-25.23%+51.09%
2000N/A-48.50%
1999N/A+12.89%

FTI vs BAP Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for FTI was -91.74%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 2840 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for BAP was -64.93%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 440 trading sessions.

The current FTI drawdown is -8.02%.

RankFTIBAP
#1-91.74%
Jul 28, 2014 - Nov 10, 2025
-64.93%
Jun 16, 2008 - Mar 16, 2010
#2-73.50%
Jun 23, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010
-59.33%
Mar 18, 2019 - Nov 18, 2024
#3-48.59%
Jun 14, 2001 - Apr 25, 2002
-56.49%
Jan 14, 2000 - Nov 25, 2003
#4-33.90%
May 14, 2002 - Aug 18, 2003
-48.00%
Dec 3, 2014 - Jan 10, 2017
#5-31.04%
Oct 29, 2007 - Apr 16, 2008
-34.18%
Nov 8, 2010 - Mar 1, 2012
#6-30.68%
Feb 13, 2012 - Mar 28, 2013
-30.50%
Mar 28, 2013 - Nov 4, 2014
#7-29.38%
May 10, 2006 - Apr 10, 2007
-24.06%
Oct 4, 2005 - Feb 27, 2006
#8-27.51%
Apr 4, 2011 - Nov 30, 2011
-20.00%
Jan 7, 2004 - Oct 6, 2004
#9-20.83%
Aug 21, 2003 - Jan 20, 2004
-16.75%
Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 17, 2007
#10-19.48%
Oct 18, 2013 - Jun 18, 2014
-16.29%
Apr 5, 2012 - Nov 9, 2012
#11-19.01%
Mar 4, 2005 - Jul 22, 2005
-15.71%
Feb 3, 2026 - Jun 11, 2026
#12-18.57%
Oct 3, 2005 - Dec 8, 2005
-15.41%
Nov 8, 2006 - Feb 9, 2007
#13-16.77%
Oct 6, 2004 - Feb 28, 2005
-15.08%
Jul 23, 2007 - Sep 27, 2007
#14-13.16%
Jan 31, 2006 - Apr 5, 2006
-14.90%
Feb 27, 2006 - May 9, 2006
#15-13.15%
Apr 29, 2026 - Jun 5, 2026
-14.48%
Nov 21, 2024 - Apr 28, 2025

Correlation

Correlation between FTI and BAP is 0.66 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.66
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

FTI vs BAP dividend yield comparison.

YearFTIBAP
20260.14%3.86%
20250.45%3.78%
20240.69%6.65%
20230.50%4.52%
20220.00%2.84%
20210.00%0.99%
20201.38%5.37%
20192.42%3.95%
20182.66%1.94%
20170.42%4.16%
20160.00%1.47%
20150.00%2.25%
20140.00%1.19%
20130.00%1.96%
20120.00%1.57%
20110.00%1.78%
20100.00%1.43%
20090.00%1.95%
200813.14%3.00%
20070.00%1.70%
20060.00%2.69%
20050.00%3.51%
20040.00%2.53%
20030.00%2.25%
20020.00%2.13%
20010.00%3.43%
20000.00%1.67%

Select Stocks to Compare