StockComparison Logo
vs

BAP vs CFG

Comparison between Credicorp Ltd (BAP, Company) and Citizens Financial Group Inc (CFG, Company).

Both BAP and CFG are from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceBAP has outperformed CFG, delivering a return of +30.9% compared to +11.7%

BAP vs CFG - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
BAP
$28B
CFG
$28B
Max Drawdown
Winner
BAP
64.93%
CFG
68.00%
Sharpe Ratio
BAP
1.81
Winner
CFG
1.98
5Y Beta
Winner
BAP
0.67
CFG
1.17
Industry
BAP
Banks - Regional
CFG
Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio
Winner
BAP
13.50
CFG
14.13
Forward P/E
Winner
BAP
12.64
CFG
13.19
PEG Ratio
Winner
BAP
0.40
CFG
0.44
Dividend Yield
Winner
BAP
3.86%
CFG
2.65%
5Y Dividends CAGR
BAP
N/A
CFG
7.31%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
BAP
42.63%
CFG
3.71%
Debt to Equity
BAP
80.93%
Winner
CFG
47.05%
Free Cash Flow Yield
BAP
6.74%
Winner
CFG
9.62%
P/S Ratio
Winner
BAP
1.33
CFG
3.52
P/B Ratio
BAP
2.54
Winner
CFG
1.15

BAP vs CFG - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
BAP
+19.49%
CFG
+9.17%
3M
BAP
+18.99%
Winner
CFG
+19.61%
6M
Winner
BAP
+36.96%
CFG
+17.45%
1Y
Winner
BAP
+77.12%
CFG
+69.57%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
BAP
+30.90%
CFG
+11.72%
10Y(CAGR)
BAP
+14.62%
Winner
CFG
+16.12%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
BAP
+17.88%
CFG
+13.46%

BAP vs CFG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearBAPCFG
2026+35.10%+15.47%
2025+64.72%+39.15%
2024+32.49%+36.46%
2023+14.25%-11.29%
2022+12.39%-16.71%
2021-21.66%+37.87%
2020-20.35%-7.00%
2019-2.35%+38.20%
2018+5.74%-28.63%
2017+34.80%+19.13%
2016+69.45%+40.90%
2015-38.03%+7.46%
2014+24.00%+8.17%
2013-9.54%N/A
2012+36.81%N/A
2011-6.73%N/A
2010+56.14%N/A
2009+56.69%N/A
2008-32.22%N/A
2007+87.36%N/A
2006+75.55%N/A
2005+51.20%N/A
2004+21.81%N/A
2003+44.34%N/A
2002+10.25%N/A
2001+51.09%N/A
2000-48.50%N/A
1999+12.89%N/A

BAP vs CFG Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for BAP was -64.93%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 440 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CFG was -65.60%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 771 trading sessions.

The current CFG drawdown is -0.02%.

RankBAPCFG
#1-64.93%
Jun 16, 2008 - Mar 16, 2010
-65.60%
Jan 23, 2018 - Feb 16, 2021
#2-59.33%
Mar 18, 2019 - Nov 18, 2024
-56.14%
Jan 14, 2022 - Jul 17, 2025
#3-56.49%
Jan 14, 2000 - Nov 25, 2003
-35.12%
Jun 5, 2015 - Nov 9, 2016
#4-48.00%
Dec 3, 2014 - Jan 10, 2017
-18.80%
May 17, 2021 - Oct 20, 2021
#5-34.18%
Nov 8, 2010 - Mar 1, 2012
-18.32%
Feb 6, 2026 - Mar 13, 2026
#6-30.50%
Mar 28, 2013 - Nov 4, 2014
-18.25%
Mar 1, 2017 - Nov 29, 2017
#7-24.06%
Oct 4, 2005 - Feb 27, 2006
-12.83%
Nov 24, 2021 - Jan 4, 2022
#8-20.00%
Jan 7, 2004 - Oct 6, 2004
-10.39%
Oct 6, 2025 - Nov 25, 2025
#9-16.75%
Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 17, 2007
-10.00%
Dec 24, 2014 - Feb 13, 2015
#10-16.29%
Apr 5, 2012 - Nov 9, 2012
-8.93%
Feb 24, 2021 - Apr 28, 2021
#11-15.71%
Feb 3, 2026 - Jun 11, 2026
-7.00%
Oct 1, 2014 - Oct 29, 2014
#12-15.41%
Nov 8, 2006 - Feb 9, 2007
-6.44%
Oct 20, 2021 - Nov 23, 2021
#13-15.08%
Jul 23, 2007 - Sep 27, 2007
-6.42%
Dec 27, 2016 - Jan 25, 2017
#14-14.90%
Feb 27, 2006 - May 9, 2006
-6.25%
Mar 17, 2015 - Apr 23, 2015
#15-14.48%
Nov 21, 2024 - Apr 28, 2025
-5.67%
Jul 23, 2025 - Aug 22, 2025

Correlation

Correlation between BAP and CFG is 0.80 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.80
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

BAP vs CFG dividend yield comparison.

YearBAPCFG
20263.86%1.36%
20253.78%2.94%
20246.65%3.84%
20234.52%5.07%
20222.84%4.11%
20210.99%3.30%
20205.37%4.36%
20193.95%3.35%
20181.94%3.30%
20174.16%1.52%
20161.47%1.29%
20152.25%1.53%
20141.19%0.40%
20131.96%0.00%
20121.57%0.00%
20111.78%0.00%
20101.43%0.00%
20091.95%0.00%
20083.00%0.00%
20071.70%0.00%
20062.69%0.00%
20053.51%0.00%
20042.53%0.00%
20032.25%0.00%
20022.13%0.00%
20013.43%0.00%
20001.67%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare