FT vs MBSF

Comparison between Franklin Universal Trust (FT, ETF) and REGAN FLOATING RATE MBS ETF (MBSF, ETF).

FT vs MBSF - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	FT(ETF)	MBSF(ETF)
Net Assets	$223M	$222M
Expense Ratio	N/A	0.49%
Max Drawdown	65.18%	1.74%
Sharpe Ratio	0.62	0.70
5Y Beta	0.29	0.01
5Y Dividends CAGR	5.27%	N/A

Net Assets

Winner

$223M

MBSF

$222M

Expense Ratio

N/A

MBSF

0.49%

Max Drawdown

65.18%

Winner

MBSF

1.74%

Sharpe Ratio

0.62

Winner

MBSF

0.70

5Y Beta

0.29

Winner

MBSF

0.01

5Y Dividends CAGR

5.27%

MBSF

N/A

FT vs MBSF - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	FT	MBSF
1 month	+0.91%	+0.28%
3 months	-0.39%	+1.46%
6 months	+2.19%	+2.08%
1 year	+9.82%	+5.87%
5 years(CAGR)	+6.58%	N/A
10 years(CAGR)	+8.09%	N/A
Max(CAGR)	+7.29%	+5.82%

Winner

+0.91%

MBSF

+0.28%

-0.39%

Winner

MBSF

+1.46%

Winner

+2.19%

MBSF

+2.08%

Winner

+9.82%

MBSF

+5.87%

5Y(CAGR)

+6.58%

MBSF

N/A

10Y(CAGR)

+8.09%

MBSF

N/A

Max(CAGR)

Winner

+7.29%

MBSF

+5.82%

FT vs MBSF - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	FT	MBSF
2026	+3.47%	+2.24%
2025	+16.44%	+5.58%
2024	+17.47%	+5.70%
2023	+4.51%	N/A
2022	-13.44%	N/A
2021	+21.55%	N/A
2020	+1.47%	N/A
2019	+30.84%	N/A
2018	-5.40%	N/A
2017	+13.25%	N/A
2016	+24.94%	N/A
2015	-12.94%	N/A
2014	+10.27%	N/A
2013	+3.10%	N/A
2012	+12.59%	N/A
2011	+13.70%	N/A
2010	+17.58%	N/A
2009	+59.78%	N/A
2008	-40.85%	N/A
2007	+7.05%	N/A
2006	+21.52%	N/A
2005	+10.02%	N/A
2004	+10.93%	N/A
2003	+21.38%	N/A
2002	-29.73%	N/A
2001	+16.33%	N/A
2000	+12.12%	N/A
1999	-14.17%	N/A

FT vs MBSF Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for FT was -54.80%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 708 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for MBSF was -0.97%, occurring on Jan 21, 2025. Recovery took 33 trading sessions.

The current FT drawdown is -1.95%. The current MBSF drawdown is -0.08%.

Rank	FT	MBSF
#1	-54.80% May 16, 2007 - Mar 9, 2010	-0.97% Jan 6, 2025 - Feb 25, 2025
#2	-40.90% Feb 21, 2020 - May 3, 2021	-0.95% Aug 15, 2024 - Sep 16, 2024
#3	-40.83% Apr 15, 2002 - May 16, 2006	-0.79% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 22, 2026
#4	-23.17% Dec 28, 2021 - Jul 31, 2024	-0.77% May 29, 2024 - Jun 11, 2024
#5	-22.90% Nov 5, 1999 - Jan 3, 2001	-0.66% Jul 29, 2024 - Aug 5, 2024
#6	-22.53% Mar 24, 2015 - May 26, 2016	-0.66% Sep 16, 2024 - Oct 23, 2024
#7	-18.10% Mar 9, 2001 - Nov 28, 2001	-0.60% Jun 30, 2025 - Jul 24, 2025
#8	-13.30% May 20, 2013 - Apr 16, 2014	-0.56% Sep 23, 2025 - Oct 2, 2025
#9	-12.55% Jul 7, 2011 - Oct 21, 2011	-0.55% May 8, 2025 - Jun 13, 2025
#10	-12.20% Sep 26, 2012 - Jan 29, 2013	-0.55% Apr 29, 2025 - May 8, 2025
#11	-10.78% Dec 6, 2017 - Feb 25, 2019	-0.55% Mar 3, 2025 - Apr 7, 2025
#12	-9.94% Apr 29, 2010 - Jul 20, 2010	-0.51% Jun 14, 2024 - Jul 10, 2024
#13	-9.44% Jul 22, 2016 - Jan 17, 2017	-0.49% May 1, 2026 - Jun 4, 2026
#14	-8.76% Mar 3, 2025 - Jun 12, 2025	-0.47% Nov 5, 2024 - Nov 20, 2024
#15	-7.68% Nov 3, 2014 - Jan 16, 2015	-0.47% Nov 28, 2025 - Dec 18, 2025

Correlation

Correlation between FT and MBSF is 0.98 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.98

-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

FT vs MBSF dividend yield comparison.

Year	FT	MBSF
2026	3.17%	1.98%
2025	6.37%	4.71%
2024	6.98%	4.14%
2023	7.67%	0.00%
2022	8.49%	0.00%
2021	6.00%	0.00%
2020	5.13%	0.00%
2019	4.95%	0.00%
2018	6.05%	0.00%
2017	5.36%	0.00%
2016	6.53%	0.00%
2015	8.28%	0.00%
2014	7.24%	0.00%
2013	6.64%	0.00%
2012	5.92%	0.00%
2011	6.82%	0.00%
2010	7.20%	0.00%
2009	7.86%	0.00%
2008	12.16%	0.00%
2007	6.60%	0.00%
2006	6.58%	0.00%
2005	6.82%	0.00%
2004	5.96%	0.00%
2003	6.79%	0.00%
2002	14.57%	0.00%
2001	9.85%	0.00%
2000	4.50%	0.00%