FT vs CSD
Comparison between Franklin Universal Trust (FT, ETF) and INVESCO S&P SPIN-OFF ETF (CSD, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceCSD has outperformed FT, delivering a return of +17.2% compared to +6.6%
FT vs CSD - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FT vs CSD - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FT vs CSD - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FT | CSD |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.47% | +33.79% |
| 2025 | +16.44% | +20.31% |
| 2024 | +17.47% | +29.21% |
| 2023 | +4.51% | +24.33% |
| 2022 | -13.44% | -15.12% |
| 2021 | +21.55% | +15.54% |
| 2020 | +1.47% | +10.77% |
| 2019 | +30.84% | +19.30% |
| 2018 | -5.40% | -18.73% |
| 2017 | +13.25% | +20.00% |
| 2016 | +24.94% | +16.46% |
| 2015 | -12.94% | -12.04% |
| 2014 | +10.27% | +2.45% |
| 2013 | +3.10% | +47.95% |
| 2012 | +12.59% | +24.81% |
| 2011 | +13.70% | +2.66% |
| 2010 | +17.58% | +20.13% |
| 2009 | +59.78% | +65.62% |
| 2008 | -40.85% | -54.42% |
| 2007 | +7.05% | +8.83% |
| 2006 | +21.52% | -0.56% |
| 2005 | +10.02% | N/A |
| 2004 | +10.93% | N/A |
| 2003 | +21.38% | N/A |
| 2002 | -29.73% | N/A |
| 2001 | +16.33% | N/A |
| 2000 | +12.12% | N/A |
| 1999 | -14.17% | N/A |
FT vs CSD Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FT was -54.80%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 708 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for CSD was -70.47%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1360 trading sessions.
The current FT drawdown is -1.95%. The current CSD drawdown is -8.63%.
| Rank | FT | CSD |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -54.80% May 16, 2007 - Mar 9, 2010 | -70.47% Jul 19, 2007 - Dec 11, 2012 |
| #2 | -40.90% Feb 21, 2020 - May 3, 2021 | -57.54% Sep 21, 2018 - Dec 16, 2020 |
| #3 | -40.83% Apr 15, 2002 - May 16, 2006 | -31.85% Apr 10, 2015 - Apr 25, 2017 |
| #4 | -23.17% Dec 28, 2021 - Jul 31, 2024 | -30.15% Jan 23, 2025 - Aug 27, 2025 |
| #5 | -22.90% Nov 5, 1999 - Jan 3, 2001 | -29.30% Sep 2, 2021 - Feb 23, 2024 |
| #6 | -22.53% Mar 24, 2015 - May 26, 2016 | -11.34% Feb 26, 2026 - Apr 9, 2026 |
| #7 | -18.10% Mar 9, 2001 - Nov 28, 2001 | -10.60% Nov 29, 2013 - Mar 4, 2014 |
| #8 | -13.30% May 20, 2013 - Apr 16, 2014 | -9.73% Mar 7, 2014 - Feb 12, 2015 |
| #9 | -12.55% Jul 7, 2011 - Oct 21, 2011 | -9.64% Jun 30, 2026 - Jul 20, 2026 |
| #10 | -12.20% Sep 26, 2012 - Jan 29, 2013 | -9.58% Jun 8, 2021 - Aug 27, 2021 |
| #11 | -10.78% Dec 6, 2017 - Feb 25, 2019 | -9.40% Jan 26, 2018 - Sep 20, 2018 |
| #12 | -9.94% Apr 29, 2010 - Jul 20, 2010 | -9.37% Nov 26, 2024 - Jan 21, 2025 |
| #13 | -9.44% Jul 22, 2016 - Jan 17, 2017 | -8.79% Jul 31, 2024 - Aug 23, 2024 |
| #14 | -8.76% Mar 3, 2025 - Jun 12, 2025 | -7.88% Nov 12, 2025 - Dec 3, 2025 |
| #15 | -7.68% Nov 3, 2014 - Jan 16, 2015 | -7.88% Jan 14, 2021 - Feb 5, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between FT and CSD is 0.94 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
FT vs CSD dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FT | CSD |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.17% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 6.37% | 0.16% |
| 2024 | 6.98% | 0.17% |
| 2023 | 7.67% | 0.51% |
| 2022 | 8.49% | 0.86% |
| 2021 | 6.00% | 0.73% |
| 2020 | 5.13% | 0.99% |
| 2019 | 4.95% | 1.08% |
| 2018 | 6.05% | 0.99% |
| 2017 | 5.36% | 0.60% |
| 2016 | 6.53% | 1.62% |
| 2015 | 8.28% | 2.61% |
| 2014 | 7.24% | 1.64% |
| 2013 | 6.64% | 0.19% |
| 2012 | 5.92% | 0.26% |
| 2011 | 6.82% | 0.48% |
| 2010 | 7.20% | 0.47% |
| 2009 | 7.86% | 1.83% |
| 2008 | 12.16% | 3.70% |
| 2007 | 6.60% | 0.69% |
| 2006 | 6.58% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 6.82% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 5.96% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 6.79% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 14.57% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 9.85% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 4.50% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks