FRT vs FLS
Comparison between Federal Realty Investment Trust. (FRT, Company) and Flowserve Corp (FLS, Company).
FRT is from the Real Estate sector, while FLS is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceFLS has outperformed FRT, delivering a return of +17.7% compared to +4.8%
FRT vs FLS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FRT vs FLS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FRT vs FLS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FRT | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +22.86% | +15.83% |
| 2025 | -4.27% | +22.83% |
| 2024 | +10.55% | +44.37% |
| 2023 | +4.98% | +35.29% |
| 2022 | -22.89% | +1.67% |
| 2021 | +71.67% | -10.02% |
| 2020 | -28.65% | -25.24% |
| 2019 | +14.66% | +33.08% |
| 2018 | -8.78% | -9.01% |
| 2017 | -4.46% | -12.92% |
| 2016 | +0.62% | +16.21% |
| 2015 | +10.42% | -28.37% |
| 2014 | +35.92% | -19.84% |
| 2013 | -0.85% | +58.24% |
| 2012 | +18.73% | +45.71% |
| 2011 | +17.07% | -16.36% |
| 2010 | +20.40% | +24.27% |
| 2009 | +19.49% | +74.34% |
| 2008 | -21.50% | -44.96% |
| 2007 | +0.03% | +89.63% |
| 2006 | +42.57% | +23.37% |
| 2005 | +23.58% | +47.28% |
| 2004 | +39.95% | +32.28% |
| 2003 | +43.36% | +36.92% |
| 2002 | +31.72% | -44.00% |
| 2001 | +31.86% | +28.99% |
| 2000 | +10.87% | +30.05% |
| 1999 | +2.73% | -1.38% |
FRT vs FLS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FRT was -57.45%, occurring on Mar 2, 2009. Recovery took 855 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for FLS was -77.36%, occurring on Oct 10, 2002. Recovery took 819 trading sessions.
The current FRT drawdown is -4.33%. The current FLS drawdown is -10.96%.
| Rank | FRT | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -57.45% Oct 5, 2007 - Feb 28, 2011 | -77.36% May 2, 2002 - Aug 2, 2005 |
| #2 | -56.51% Aug 1, 2016 - May 21, 2026 | -73.54% Apr 2, 2014 - Oct 29, 2025 |
| #3 | -25.68% Apr 1, 2004 - Sep 7, 2004 | -73.10% Jul 21, 2008 - Sep 14, 2012 |
| #4 | -22.95% Feb 7, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 | -41.25% May 22, 2001 - Apr 25, 2002 |
| #5 | -17.85% May 15, 2013 - Mar 31, 2014 | -40.31% Nov 18, 1999 - Aug 22, 2000 |
| #6 | -16.59% Jul 22, 2011 - Aug 30, 2011 | -29.83% Feb 25, 2026 - May 19, 2026 |
| #7 | -16.31% Mar 23, 2015 - Nov 5, 2015 | -21.25% May 10, 2006 - Apr 24, 2007 |
| #8 | -15.37% Apr 12, 2002 - Dec 3, 2002 | -20.62% Dec 13, 2007 - Feb 20, 2008 |
| #9 | -15.28% Nov 4, 1999 - Jan 6, 2000 | -17.19% Aug 8, 2007 - Sep 19, 2007 |
| #10 | -14.30% Aug 22, 2001 - Nov 16, 2001 | -17.08% Jun 16, 2008 - Jul 14, 2008 |
| #11 | -14.14% Mar 29, 2006 - Sep 12, 2006 | -16.74% Mar 7, 2001 - Apr 17, 2001 |
| #12 | -13.04% Jul 28, 2005 - Nov 22, 2005 | -15.47% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 7, 2008 |
| #13 | -11.97% Jan 10, 2000 - Apr 6, 2000 | -15.35% Dec 12, 2000 - Dec 27, 2000 |
| #14 | -11.14% May 18, 2000 - May 21, 2001 | -13.80% Sep 6, 2000 - Oct 30, 2000 |
| #15 | -10.99% Dec 30, 2004 - Apr 22, 2005 | -11.57% Dec 31, 2013 - Feb 19, 2014 |
Correlation
Correlation between FRT and FLS is 0.85 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
FRT vs FLS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FRT | FLS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.88% | 0.27% |
| 2025 | 4.39% | 1.21% |
| 2024 | 2.93% | 1.46% |
| 2023 | 4.21% | 1.94% |
| 2022 | 4.26% | 2.61% |
| 2021 | 3.13% | 2.61% |
| 2020 | 4.96% | 2.17% |
| 2019 | 3.22% | 1.91% |
| 2018 | 3.42% | 2.00% |
| 2017 | 2.98% | 1.35% |
| 2016 | 2.70% | 1.58% |
| 2015 | 2.48% | 1.71% |
| 2014 | 2.47% | 4.41% |
| 2013 | 2.98% | 1.24% |
| 2012 | 3.48% | 0.98% |
| 2011 | 3.00% | 1.29% |
| 2010 | 3.41% | 0.97% |
| 2009 | 3.87% | 1.14% |
| 2008 | 4.06% | 1.94% |
| 2007 | 2.88% | 0.62% |
| 2006 | 2.89% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 3.91% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 3.85% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 5.08% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 6.86% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 8.26% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 9.68% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 2.39% | 0.82% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks