FLS vs WTRG
Comparison between Flowserve Corp (FLS, Company) and Essential Utilities Inc (WTRG, Company).
FLS is from the Industrials sector, while WTRG is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceFLS has outperformed WTRG, delivering a return of +17.7% compared to -1.7%
FLS vs WTRG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FLS vs WTRG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FLS vs WTRG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FLS | WTRG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +15.83% | -3.35% |
| 2025 | +22.83% | +10.28% |
| 2024 | +44.37% | -0.73% |
| 2023 | +35.29% | -20.09% |
| 2022 | +1.67% | -7.97% |
| 2021 | -10.02% | +18.80% |
| 2020 | -25.24% | +5.31% |
| 2019 | +33.08% | +46.23% |
| 2018 | -9.01% | -9.34% |
| 2017 | -12.92% | +34.03% |
| 2016 | +16.21% | +4.38% |
| 2015 | -28.37% | +13.90% |
| 2014 | -19.84% | +18.41% |
| 2013 | +58.24% | +14.35% |
| 2012 | +45.71% | +19.91% |
| 2011 | -16.36% | -0.03% |
| 2010 | +24.27% | +32.71% |
| 2009 | +74.34% | -13.86% |
| 2008 | -44.96% | -0.44% |
| 2007 | +89.63% | -3.81% |
| 2006 | +23.37% | -15.81% |
| 2005 | +47.28% | +53.25% |
| 2004 | +32.28% | +13.79% |
| 2003 | +36.92% | +36.99% |
| 2002 | -44.00% | -7.07% |
| 2001 | +28.99% | +26.20% |
| 2000 | +30.05% | +57.22% |
| 1999 | -1.38% | -9.58% |
FLS vs WTRG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FLS was -77.36%, occurring on Oct 10, 2002. Recovery took 819 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for WTRG was -47.97%, occurring on Jul 15, 2008. Recovery took 1599 trading sessions.
The current FLS drawdown is -10.96%. The current WTRG drawdown is -21.31%.
| Rank | FLS | WTRG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -77.36% May 2, 2002 - Aug 2, 2005 | -47.97% Feb 27, 2006 - Jul 2, 2012 |
| #2 | -73.54% Apr 2, 2014 - Oct 29, 2025 | -39.62% Feb 18, 2020 - Dec 22, 2021 |
| #3 | -73.10% Jul 21, 2008 - Sep 14, 2012 | -36.50% Dec 31, 2021 - Oct 3, 2023 |
| #4 | -41.25% May 22, 2001 - Apr 25, 2002 | -34.47% May 8, 2002 - Jun 12, 2003 |
| #5 | -40.31% Nov 18, 1999 - Aug 22, 2000 | -28.60% Nov 5, 1999 - Apr 18, 2000 |
| #6 | -29.83% Feb 25, 2026 - May 19, 2026 | -19.91% Oct 3, 2005 - Feb 22, 2006 |
| #7 | -21.25% May 10, 2006 - Apr 24, 2007 | -19.39% Dec 28, 2000 - Jun 20, 2001 |
| #8 | -20.62% Dec 13, 2007 - Feb 20, 2008 | -19.11% Jun 30, 2016 - Sep 11, 2017 |
| #9 | -17.19% Aug 8, 2007 - Sep 19, 2007 | -18.44% May 2, 2000 - Dec 11, 2000 |
| #10 | -17.08% Jun 16, 2008 - Jul 14, 2008 | -18.32% Aug 1, 2013 - Dec 29, 2014 |
| #11 | -16.74% Mar 7, 2001 - Apr 17, 2001 | -16.87% Dec 28, 2017 - Apr 24, 2019 |
| #12 | -15.47% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 7, 2008 | -15.16% Jan 21, 2004 - Oct 1, 2004 |
| #13 | -15.35% Dec 12, 2000 - Dec 27, 2000 | -14.96% Aug 20, 2001 - Nov 8, 2001 |
| #14 | -13.80% Sep 6, 2000 - Oct 30, 2000 | -11.74% Jan 29, 2015 - Oct 15, 2015 |
| #15 | -11.57% Dec 31, 2013 - Feb 19, 2014 | -11.60% Nov 26, 2001 - Mar 4, 2002 |
Correlation
Correlation between FLS and WTRG is 0.68 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
FLS vs WTRG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FLS | WTRG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.27% | 1.87% |
| 2025 | 1.21% | 3.48% |
| 2024 | 1.46% | 3.48% |
| 2023 | 1.94% | 3.18% |
| 2022 | 2.61% | 2.33% |
| 2021 | 2.61% | 1.93% |
| 2020 | 2.17% | 2.05% |
| 2019 | 1.91% | 1.93% |
| 2018 | 2.00% | 2.48% |
| 2017 | 1.35% | 2.02% |
| 2016 | 1.58% | 2.46% |
| 2015 | 1.71% | 2.30% |
| 2014 | 4.41% | 2.37% |
| 2013 | 1.24% | 2.48% |
| 2012 | 0.98% | 2.64% |
| 2011 | 1.29% | 2.86% |
| 2010 | 0.97% | 2.62% |
| 2009 | 1.14% | 3.14% |
| 2008 | 1.94% | 2.48% |
| 2007 | 0.62% | 2.26% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.95% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.46% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.99% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 2.06% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 2.60% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 2.38% |
| 1999 | 0.82% | 0.87% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks