FMS vs BSAC
Comparison between Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS, Company) and Banco Santander Chile SA (BSAC, Company).
FMS is from the Healthcare sector, while BSAC is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceBSAC has outperformed FMS, delivering a return of +19.5% compared to -7.5%
FMS vs BSAC - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FMS vs BSAC - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FMS vs BSAC - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FMS | BSAC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +6.66% | +11.07% |
| 2025 | +10.46% | +75.73% |
| 2024 | +9.62% | +1.27% |
| 2023 | +32.75% | +36.36% |
| 2022 | -48.69% | +0.45% |
| 2021 | -22.15% | -14.92% |
| 2020 | +14.17% | -15.33% |
| 2019 | +14.97% | -20.04% |
| 2018 | -37.35% | -3.62% |
| 2017 | +25.11% | +47.27% |
| 2016 | +3.00% | +31.66% |
| 2015 | +15.27% | -5.55% |
| 2014 | +7.92% | -11.95% |
| 2013 | +4.68% | -15.15% |
| 2012 | -1.60% | -0.00% |
| 2011 | +19.12% | -17.23% |
| 2010 | +6.92% | +48.68% |
| 2009 | +12.89% | +88.68% |
| 2008 | -9.60% | -28.46% |
| 2007 | +17.56% | +8.49% |
| 2006 | +24.19% | +10.31% |
| 2005 | +32.87% | +39.58% |
| 2004 | +13.43% | +50.70% |
| 2003 | +75.69% | +33.30% |
| 2002 | -32.86% | -11.72% |
| 2001 | -28.05% | +21.90% |
| 2000 | -1.41% | -5.85% |
| 1999 | +20.10% | +6.90% |
FMS vs BSAC Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FMS was -76.71%, occurring on Sep 19, 2002. Recovery took 1109 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for BSAC was -63.90%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 1764 trading sessions.
The current FMS drawdown is -48.23%. The current BSAC drawdown is -7.50%.
| Rank | FMS | BSAC |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -76.71% Sep 22, 2000 - Feb 24, 2005 | -63.90% Apr 18, 2018 - Apr 24, 2025 |
| #2 | -75.62% Jan 31, 2018 - Oct 10, 2022 | -51.17% Sep 14, 2010 - Sep 22, 2017 |
| #3 | -39.57% Jul 10, 2008 - Aug 17, 2010 | -48.42% May 1, 2008 - Aug 13, 2009 |
| #4 | -24.50% Dec 1, 1999 - Sep 1, 2000 | -31.51% Jan 21, 2000 - May 24, 2001 |
| #5 | -20.91% Jul 26, 2011 - Feb 25, 2015 | -30.18% May 25, 2001 - Jul 25, 2003 |
| #6 | -20.16% Jan 10, 2008 - Jul 3, 2008 | -22.67% Jan 31, 2006 - Nov 1, 2006 |
| #7 | -19.10% Aug 9, 2016 - May 31, 2017 | -20.45% Oct 26, 2007 - May 1, 2008 |
| #8 | -15.76% May 2, 2006 - Aug 2, 2006 | -19.92% May 4, 2007 - Oct 2, 2007 |
| #9 | -14.90% Jul 20, 2015 - Oct 29, 2015 | -19.25% Feb 12, 2004 - Nov 18, 2004 |
| #10 | -13.95% Nov 2, 2015 - Jul 28, 2016 | -18.42% Feb 9, 2026 - Mar 13, 2026 |
| #11 | -12.99% Mar 1, 2005 - Aug 3, 2005 | -15.69% Oct 30, 2017 - Dec 18, 2017 |
| #12 | -12.90% Oct 14, 2010 - Feb 15, 2011 | -14.77% Apr 9, 2010 - Jun 21, 2010 |
| #13 | -11.81% May 8, 2007 - Sep 12, 2007 | -14.41% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 23, 2005 |
| #14 | -10.72% Apr 29, 2011 - Jul 25, 2011 | -14.22% Jan 19, 2010 - Apr 7, 2010 |
| #15 | -9.92% Jun 14, 2017 - Dec 4, 2017 | -10.45% Nov 16, 2006 - Apr 9, 2007 |
Correlation
Correlation between FMS and BSAC is 0.68 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
FMS vs BSAC dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FMS | BSAC |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.62% | 4.59% |
| 2025 | 3.30% | 4.34% |
| 2024 | 2.80% | 4.10% |
| 2023 | 2.97% | 6.54% |
| 2022 | 4.34% | 7.71% |
| 2021 | 2.57% | 5.70% |
| 2020 | 1.72% | 4.64% |
| 2019 | 1.78% | 4.91% |
| 2018 | 1.95% | 4.97% |
| 2017 | 0.70% | 2.73% |
| 2016 | 0.74% | 3.94% |
| 2015 | 0.71% | 5.12% |
| 2014 | 0.99% | 3.90% |
| 2013 | 0.94% | 3.43% |
| 2012 | 0.91% | 3.12% |
| 2011 | 0.96% | 2.90% |
| 2010 | 0.93% | 2.22% |
| 2009 | 1.06% | 2.46% |
| 2008 | 1.38% | 5.30% |
| 2007 | 0.91% | 3.00% |
| 2006 | 0.93% | 2.71% |
| 2005 | 1.06% | 3.27% |
| 2004 | 1.22% | 4.08% |
| 2003 | 1.24% | 3.90% |
| 2002 | 1.49% | 6.54% |
| 2001 | 0.81% | 4.53% |
| 2000 | 0.58% | 3.47% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks