FMS vs ALB
Comparison between Fresenius Medical Care AG & Co. KGaA (FMS, Company) and Albemarle Corp (ALB, Company).
FMS is from the Healthcare sector, while ALB is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceALB has outperformed FMS, delivering a return of -6.8% compared to -7.5%
FMS vs ALB - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FMS vs ALB - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FMS vs ALB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FMS | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +6.66% | -16.63% |
| 2025 | +10.46% | +69.37% |
| 2024 | +9.62% | -40.46% |
| 2023 | +32.75% | -32.07% |
| 2022 | -48.69% | -7.76% |
| 2021 | -22.15% | +54.41% |
| 2020 | +14.17% | +106.78% |
| 2019 | +14.97% | -4.60% |
| 2018 | -37.35% | -40.58% |
| 2017 | +25.11% | +46.84% |
| 2016 | +3.00% | +57.51% |
| 2015 | +15.27% | -4.95% |
| 2014 | +7.92% | -3.13% |
| 2013 | +4.68% | +0.06% |
| 2012 | -1.60% | +19.42% |
| 2011 | +19.12% | -6.62% |
| 2010 | +6.92% | +48.29% |
| 2009 | +12.89% | +60.40% |
| 2008 | -9.60% | -44.46% |
| 2007 | +17.56% | +15.81% |
| 2006 | +24.19% | +77.63% |
| 2005 | +32.87% | +2.50% |
| 2004 | +13.43% | +30.33% |
| 2003 | +75.69% | +7.05% |
| 2002 | -32.86% | +21.26% |
| 2001 | -28.05% | +5.14% |
| 2000 | -1.41% | +40.63% |
| 1999 | +20.10% | +0.87% |
FMS vs ALB Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FMS was -76.71%, occurring on Sep 19, 2002. Recovery took 1109 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for ALB was -83.90%, occurring on Apr 8, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current FMS drawdown is -48.23%. The current ALB drawdown is -61.37%.
| Rank | FMS | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -76.71% Sep 22, 2000 - Feb 24, 2005 | -83.90% Nov 11, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025 |
| #2 | -75.62% Jan 31, 2018 - Oct 10, 2022 | -66.29% Oct 31, 2007 - Apr 29, 2010 |
| #3 | -39.57% Jul 10, 2008 - Aug 17, 2010 | -63.27% Nov 8, 2017 - Nov 27, 2020 |
| #4 | -24.50% Dec 1, 1999 - Sep 1, 2000 | -44.82% May 10, 2011 - Nov 27, 2013 |
| #5 | -20.91% Jul 26, 2011 - Feb 25, 2015 | -41.04% Jul 14, 2014 - May 11, 2016 |
| #6 | -20.16% Jan 10, 2008 - Jul 3, 2008 | -39.26% Nov 22, 2021 - Aug 15, 2022 |
| #7 | -19.10% Aug 9, 2016 - May 31, 2017 | -30.91% Jun 10, 2002 - Jun 29, 2004 |
| #8 | -15.76% May 2, 2006 - Aug 2, 2006 | -30.70% Dec 28, 2000 - Mar 4, 2002 |
| #9 | -14.90% Jul 20, 2015 - Oct 29, 2015 | -26.73% Aug 16, 2000 - Dec 28, 2000 |
| #10 | -13.95% Nov 2, 2015 - Jul 28, 2016 | -24.92% Nov 15, 1999 - Mar 20, 2000 |
| #11 | -12.99% Mar 1, 2005 - Aug 3, 2005 | -24.05% Jan 19, 2021 - Jul 12, 2021 |
| #12 | -12.90% Oct 14, 2010 - Feb 15, 2011 | -22.55% Sep 14, 2022 - Nov 10, 2022 |
| #13 | -11.81% May 8, 2007 - Sep 12, 2007 | -20.14% Apr 23, 2007 - Sep 26, 2007 |
| #14 | -10.72% Apr 29, 2011 - Jul 25, 2011 | -18.86% Dec 1, 2004 - Jan 3, 2006 |
| #15 | -9.92% Jun 14, 2017 - Dec 4, 2017 | -15.62% Apr 29, 2010 - Sep 30, 2010 |
Correlation
Correlation between FMS and ALB is 0.41 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
FMS vs ALB dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FMS | ALB |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.62% | 0.68% |
| 2025 | 3.30% | 1.15% |
| 2024 | 2.80% | 1.87% |
| 2023 | 2.97% | 1.11% |
| 2022 | 4.34% | 0.73% |
| 2021 | 2.57% | 0.67% |
| 2020 | 1.72% | 1.04% |
| 2019 | 1.78% | 2.01% |
| 2018 | 1.95% | 1.74% |
| 2017 | 0.70% | 1.00% |
| 2016 | 0.74% | 1.42% |
| 2015 | 0.71% | 2.07% |
| 2014 | 0.99% | 1.83% |
| 2013 | 0.94% | 1.51% |
| 2012 | 0.91% | 1.29% |
| 2011 | 0.96% | 1.30% |
| 2010 | 0.93% | 1.00% |
| 2009 | 1.06% | 1.37% |
| 2008 | 1.38% | 2.15% |
| 2007 | 0.91% | 1.02% |
| 2006 | 0.93% | 0.96% |
| 2005 | 1.06% | 1.62% |
| 2004 | 1.22% | 1.51% |
| 2003 | 1.24% | 1.89% |
| 2002 | 1.49% | 1.90% |
| 2001 | 0.81% | 2.17% |
| 2000 | 0.58% | 1.86% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.52% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks