FLS vs EMN
Comparison between Flowserve Corp (FLS, Company) and Eastman Chemical Company (EMN, Company).
FLS is from the Industrials sector, while EMN is from the Basic Materials sector.
5-Year PerformanceFLS has outperformed EMN, delivering a return of +10.7% compared to -7.8%
FLS vs EMN - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
FLS vs EMN - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
FLS vs EMN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | FLS | EMN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -7.76% | +12.57% |
| 2025 | +22.83% | -24.53% |
| 2024 | +44.37% | +5.62% |
| 2023 | +35.29% | +13.61% |
| 2022 | +1.67% | -29.62% |
| 2021 | -10.02% | +25.71% |
| 2020 | -25.24% | +32.48% |
| 2019 | +33.08% | +12.06% |
| 2018 | -9.01% | -20.50% |
| 2017 | -12.92% | +25.08% |
| 2016 | +16.21% | +15.91% |
| 2015 | -28.37% | -9.67% |
| 2014 | -19.84% | -3.84% |
| 2013 | +58.24% | +17.63% |
| 2012 | +45.71% | +72.68% |
| 2011 | -16.36% | -6.26% |
| 2010 | +24.27% | +39.87% |
| 2009 | +74.34% | +90.79% |
| 2008 | -44.96% | -45.80% |
| 2007 | +89.63% | +4.61% |
| 2006 | +23.37% | +17.28% |
| 2005 | +47.28% | -6.99% |
| 2004 | +32.28% | +51.49% |
| 2003 | +36.92% | +10.46% |
| 2002 | -44.00% | -1.78% |
| 2001 | +28.99% | -14.35% |
| 2000 | +30.05% | +9.36% |
| 1999 | -1.38% | +27.57% |
FLS vs EMN Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for FLS was -77.36%, occurring on Oct 10, 2002. Recovery took 819 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for EMN was -76.10%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 588 trading sessions.
The current FLS drawdown is -29.10%. The current EMN drawdown is -34.09%.
| Rank | FLS | EMN |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -77.36% May 2, 2002 - Aug 2, 2005 | -76.10% May 20, 2008 - Sep 20, 2010 |
| #2 | -73.54% Apr 2, 2014 - Oct 29, 2025 | -62.79% Mar 12, 2018 - Nov 24, 2020 |
| #3 | -73.10% Jul 21, 2008 - Sep 14, 2012 | -49.36% Jan 18, 2022 - Nov 20, 2025 |
| #4 | -41.25% May 22, 2001 - Apr 25, 2002 | -44.78% May 17, 2001 - Sep 30, 2004 |
| #5 | -40.31% Nov 18, 1999 - Aug 22, 2000 | -37.68% May 10, 2011 - Feb 3, 2012 |
| #6 | -29.10% Feb 25, 2026 - May 15, 2026 | -32.81% Jun 4, 2014 - Jun 13, 2017 |
| #7 | -21.25% May 10, 2006 - Apr 24, 2007 | -32.78% May 22, 2000 - Mar 7, 2001 |
| #8 | -20.62% Dec 13, 2007 - Feb 20, 2008 | -32.38% Jan 6, 2000 - Apr 28, 2000 |
| #9 | -17.19% Aug 8, 2007 - Sep 19, 2007 | -25.48% Mar 11, 2005 - Oct 27, 2006 |
| #10 | -17.08% Jun 16, 2008 - Jul 14, 2008 | -22.79% Jun 1, 2021 - Jan 18, 2022 |
| #11 | -16.74% Mar 7, 2001 - Apr 17, 2001 | -20.90% Feb 28, 2012 - Aug 7, 2012 |
| #12 | -15.47% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 7, 2008 | -17.42% Jul 23, 2007 - Apr 8, 2008 |
| #13 | -15.35% Dec 12, 2000 - Dec 27, 2000 | -13.98% Feb 13, 2013 - Jul 15, 2013 |
| #14 | -13.80% Sep 6, 2000 - Oct 30, 2000 | -11.60% Oct 23, 2013 - Feb 13, 2014 |
| #15 | -11.57% Dec 31, 2013 - Feb 19, 2014 | -11.57% Dec 28, 2004 - Feb 25, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between FLS and EMN is 0.77 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
FLS vs EMN dividend yield comparison.
| Year | FLS | EMN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.34% | 1.17% |
| 2025 | 1.21% | 5.22% |
| 2024 | 1.46% | 3.57% |
| 2023 | 1.94% | 3.54% |
| 2022 | 2.61% | 3.77% |
| 2021 | 2.61% | 2.34% |
| 2020 | 2.17% | 2.66% |
| 2019 | 1.91% | 3.18% |
| 2018 | 2.00% | 3.15% |
| 2017 | 1.35% | 2.26% |
| 2016 | 1.58% | 2.51% |
| 2015 | 1.71% | 2.46% |
| 2014 | 4.41% | 1.91% |
| 2013 | 1.24% | 1.55% |
| 2012 | 0.98% | 1.59% |
| 2011 | 1.29% | 2.53% |
| 2010 | 0.97% | 2.13% |
| 2009 | 1.14% | 2.92% |
| 2008 | 1.94% | 5.55% |
| 2007 | 0.62% | 2.88% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 2.98% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 3.41% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 3.05% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 4.45% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 4.79% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 4.51% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 3.61% |
| 1999 | 0.82% | 0.92% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks