StockComparison Logo
vs

EMN vs MSGS

Comparison between Eastman Chemical Company (EMN, Company) and Madison Square Garden Sports Corp - Class A (MSGS, Company).

EMN is from the Basic Materials sector, while MSGS is from the Communication Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceMSGS has outperformed EMN, delivering a return of +14.7% compared to -7.8%

EMN vs MSGS - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
EMN
$8.43B
MSGS
$8.41B
Max Drawdown
EMN
76.78%
Winner
MSGS
41.57%
Sharpe Ratio
EMN
-0.11
Winner
MSGS
1.97
5Y Beta
EMN
1.07
Winner
MSGS
0.68
Industry
EMN
Specialty Chemicals
MSGS
Entertainment
P/E Ratio
EMN
17.80
Winner
MSGS
-241.67
Forward P/E
Winner
EMN
11.43
MSGS
72.46
PEG Ratio
EMN
0.63
MSGS
N/A
Dividend Yield
EMN
4.50%
MSGS
N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR
EMN
4.41%
MSGS
N/A
5Y EPS CAGR
EMN
-13.84%
MSGS
N/A
Debt to Equity
EMN
86.87%
Winner
MSGS
-87.49%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
EMN
5.91%
MSGS
0.63%
P/S Ratio
Winner
EMN
0.98
MSGS
7.77
P/B Ratio
Winner
EMN
1.40
MSGS
1.57

EMN vs MSGS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
EMN
-1.64%
Winner
MSGS
+5.00%
3M
EMN
-9.56%
Winner
MSGS
+20.61%
6M
EMN
+21.79%
Winner
MSGS
+62.79%
1Y
EMN
-7.54%
Winner
MSGS
+78.66%
5Y(CAGR)
EMN
-7.84%
Winner
MSGS
+14.70%
10Y(CAGR)
EMN
+3.01%
Winner
MSGS
+15.92%
Max(CAGR)
EMN
+8.62%
Winner
MSGS
+15.08%

EMN vs MSGS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearEMNMSGS
2026+12.57%+35.80%
2025-24.53%+15.94%
2024+5.62%+24.80%
2023+13.61%+0.31%
2022-29.62%+8.37%
2021+25.71%-3.03%
2020+32.48%+19.29%
2019+12.06%+10.76%
2018-20.50%+27.82%
2017+25.08%+20.73%
2016+15.91%+11.33%
2015-9.67%+1.45%
2014-3.84%N/A
2013+17.63%N/A
2012+72.68%N/A
2011-6.26%N/A
2010+39.87%N/A
2009+90.79%N/A
2008-45.80%N/A
2007+4.61%N/A
2006+17.28%N/A
2005-6.99%N/A
2004+51.49%N/A
2003+10.46%N/A
2002-1.78%N/A
2001-14.35%N/A
2000+9.36%N/A
1999+27.57%N/A

EMN vs MSGS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for EMN was -76.10%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 588 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for MSGS was -41.57%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 449 trading sessions.

The current EMN drawdown is -34.09%.

RankEMNMSGS
#1-76.10%
May 20, 2008 - Sep 20, 2010
-41.57%
Jul 6, 2018 - Apr 20, 2020
#2-62.79%
Mar 12, 2018 - Nov 24, 2020
-33.28%
Mar 1, 2021 - Apr 11, 2023
#3-49.36%
Jan 18, 2022 - Nov 20, 2025
-25.54%
Dec 16, 2024 - Dec 12, 2025
#4-44.78%
May 17, 2001 - Sep 30, 2004
-22.82%
Oct 15, 2015 - Jul 22, 2016
#5-37.68%
May 10, 2011 - Feb 3, 2012
-22.36%
Apr 20, 2020 - Dec 28, 2020
#6-32.81%
Jun 4, 2014 - Jun 13, 2017
-22.36%
Jul 31, 2023 - Oct 3, 2024
#7-32.78%
May 22, 2000 - Mar 7, 2001
-15.83%
May 4, 2023 - Jul 28, 2023
#8-32.38%
Jan 6, 2000 - Apr 28, 2000
-14.19%
Aug 18, 2016 - Mar 3, 2017
#9-25.48%
Mar 11, 2005 - Oct 27, 2006
-13.16%
Jan 6, 2021 - Feb 19, 2021
#10-22.79%
Jun 1, 2021 - Jan 18, 2022
-10.08%
Feb 18, 2026 - Apr 30, 2026
#11-20.90%
Feb 28, 2012 - Aug 7, 2012
-9.49%
Nov 9, 2017 - Feb 20, 2018
#12-17.42%
Jul 23, 2007 - Apr 8, 2008
-7.36%
Sep 6, 2017 - Nov 3, 2017
#13-13.98%
Feb 13, 2013 - Jul 15, 2013
-6.56%
Apr 6, 2017 - Jul 19, 2017
#14-11.60%
Oct 23, 2013 - Feb 13, 2014
-5.72%
Jun 20, 2018 - Jun 28, 2018
#15-11.57%
Dec 28, 2004 - Feb 25, 2005
-5.51%
Jan 16, 2026 - Feb 13, 2026

Correlation

Correlation between EMN and MSGS is 0.49 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.

0.49
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

EMN vs MSGS dividend yield comparison.

YearEMNMSGS
20261.17%0.00%
20255.22%0.00%
20243.57%0.00%
20233.54%0.00%
20223.77%3.82%
20212.34%0.00%
20202.66%36.97%
20193.18%0.00%
20183.15%0.00%
20172.26%0.00%
20162.51%0.00%
20152.46%0.00%
20141.91%0.00%
20131.55%0.00%
20121.59%0.00%
20112.53%0.00%
20102.13%0.00%
20092.92%0.00%
20085.55%0.00%
20072.88%0.00%
20062.98%0.00%
20053.41%0.00%
20043.05%0.00%
20034.45%0.00%
20024.79%0.00%
20014.51%0.00%
20003.61%0.00%
19990.92%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare