StockComparison Logo
vs

FITBP vs SQM

Comparison between Fifth Third Bancorp Depositary Shares each representing 140th share of Fifth Third 6.00 NonCumulative Perpetual Class B Preferred Stock Series A (FITBP, Company) and Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company).

FITBP is from the Financial Services sector, while SQM is from the Basic Materials sector.

FITBP vs SQM - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
FITBP
$22B
SQM
$22B
Max Drawdown
FITBP
N/A
SQM
80.45%
Sharpe Ratio
FITBP
0.00
Winner
SQM
1.70
5Y Beta
Winner
FITBP
0.00
SQM
1.04
Industry
FITBP
Banks - Regional
SQM
Specialty Chemicals
P/E Ratio
Winner
FITBP
7.41
SQM
26.40
Forward P/E
FITBP
N/A
SQM
11.10
PEG Ratio
FITBP
N/A
SQM
0.74
Dividend Yield
Winner
FITBP
6.68%
SQM
1.36%
5Y Dividends CAGR
FITBP
N/A
SQM
15.24%
5Y EPS CAGR
FITBP
1.95%
Winner
SQM
32.32%
Debt to Equity
Winner
FITBP
58.76%
SQM
87.35%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
FITBP
7.25%
SQM
5.01%
P/S Ratio
FITBP
N/A
SQM
4.07
P/B Ratio
FITBP
N/A
SQM
3.69

FITBP vs SQM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
FITBP
N/A
SQM
-10.99%
3M
FITBP
N/A
SQM
-6.43%
6M
FITBP
N/A
SQM
+1.24%
1Y
FITBP
N/A
SQM
+105.75%
5Y(CAGR)
FITBP
N/A
SQM
+13.26%
10Y(CAGR)
FITBP
N/A
SQM
+16.37%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
FITBP
+51.09%
SQM
+17.44%

FITBP vs SQM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearFITBPSQM
2026+1.59%+3.82%
2025N/A+91.19%
2024N/A-38.56%
2023N/A-15.40%
2022N/A+70.49%
2021N/A+2.60%
2020N/A+87.42%
2019N/A-27.79%
2018N/A-35.04%
2017N/A+113.53%
2016N/A+61.04%
2015N/A-20.43%
2014N/A-1.99%
2013N/A-54.46%
2012N/A+7.62%
2011N/A-7.72%
2010N/A+53.00%
2009N/A+51.16%
2008N/A+46.55%
2007N/A+33.91%
2006N/A+23.39%
2005N/A+82.30%
2004N/A+52.01%
2003N/A+94.94%
2002N/A-8.87%
2001N/A+19.25%
2000N/A-10.37%
1999N/A+9.77%

FITBP vs SQM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.

The current SQM drawdown is -27.09%.

RankFITBPSQM
#1N/A-78.36%
Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017
#2N/A-73.00%
Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021
#3N/A-72.14%
Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010
#4N/A-69.81%
Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025
#5N/A-35.54%
Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002
#6N/A-31.32%
Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006
#7N/A-30.96%
Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021
#8N/A-29.41%
Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022
#9N/A-27.46%
Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004
#10N/A-26.31%
May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022
#11N/A-26.31%
Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008
#12N/A-24.67%
May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003
#13N/A-19.95%
Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007
#14N/A-19.89%
Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022
#15N/A-19.15%
Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022

Correlation

Correlation between FITBP and SQM is 0.00 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.

0.00
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

FITBP vs SQM dividend yield comparison.

YearFITBPSQM
20261.59%1.44%
20250.00%0.18%
20240.00%0.59%
20230.00%8.34%
20220.00%9.66%
20210.00%3.92%
20200.00%1.64%
20190.00%4.55%
20180.00%5.37%
20170.00%2.73%
20160.00%4.77%
20150.00%2.00%
20140.00%4.71%
20130.00%3.21%
20120.00%1.69%
20110.00%1.40%
20100.00%0.87%
20090.00%2.70%
20080.00%3.71%
20070.00%2.01%
20060.00%1.76%
20050.00%1.49%
20040.00%1.21%
20030.00%1.20%
20020.00%1.88%
20010.00%2.16%
20000.00%42.10%

Select Stocks to Compare