SQM vs BCE
Comparison between Sociedad Quimica Y Minera de Chile S.A. (SQM, Company) and BCE Inc (BCE, Company).
SQM is from the Basic Materials sector, while BCE is from the Communication Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceSQM has outperformed BCE, delivering a return of +13.3% compared to -8.2%
SQM vs BCE - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SQM vs BCE - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SQM vs BCE - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SQM | BCE |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +3.82% | -0.64% |
| 2025 | +91.19% | +9.90% |
| 2024 | -38.56% | -37.00% |
| 2023 | -15.40% | -4.40% |
| 2022 | +70.49% | -10.67% |
| 2021 | +2.60% | +28.05% |
| 2020 | +87.42% | -1.19% |
| 2019 | -27.79% | +22.82% |
| 2018 | -35.04% | -12.62% |
| 2017 | +113.53% | +15.90% |
| 2016 | +61.04% | +18.16% |
| 2015 | -20.43% | -10.67% |
| 2014 | -1.99% | +12.64% |
| 2013 | -54.46% | +4.60% |
| 2012 | +7.62% | +8.37% |
| 2011 | -7.72% | +22.36% |
| 2010 | +53.00% | +34.46% |
| 2009 | +51.16% | +43.46% |
| 2008 | +46.55% | -46.90% |
| 2007 | +33.91% | +56.35% |
| 2006 | +23.39% | +18.26% |
| 2005 | +82.30% | +5.52% |
| 2004 | +52.01% | +11.98% |
| 2003 | +94.94% | +25.97% |
| 2002 | -8.87% | -16.12% |
| 2001 | +19.25% | -16.64% |
| 2000 | -10.37% | +45.08% |
| 1999 | +9.77% | +44.93% |
SQM vs BCE Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SQM was -78.36%, occurring on Jul 27, 2015. Recovery took 1547 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for BCE was -60.66%, occurring on Dec 12, 2008. Recovery took 870 trading sessions.
The current SQM drawdown is -27.09%. The current BCE drawdown is -47.55%.
| Rank | SQM | BCE |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.36% Jul 22, 2011 - Sep 14, 2017 | -60.66% Nov 6, 2007 - Apr 20, 2011 |
| #2 | -73.00% Jan 11, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021 | -55.28% Apr 20, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025 |
| #3 | -72.14% Jun 18, 2008 - Nov 4, 2010 | -50.46% Mar 27, 2000 - Aug 11, 2005 |
| #4 | -69.81% Sep 14, 2022 - Jun 2, 2025 | -34.06% Feb 18, 2020 - Mar 22, 2021 |
| #5 | -35.54% Feb 4, 2000 - May 17, 2002 | -20.26% Sep 19, 2005 - Sep 12, 2006 |
| #6 | -31.32% Oct 3, 2005 - Nov 21, 2006 | -20.12% Dec 27, 1999 - Jan 26, 2000 |
| #7 | -30.96% Jan 12, 2021 - Nov 2, 2021 | -18.36% Oct 11, 2006 - Apr 4, 2007 |
| #8 | -29.41% Nov 22, 2021 - Feb 15, 2022 | -17.79% Jan 16, 2015 - Mar 16, 2016 |
| #9 | -27.46% Oct 21, 2003 - Aug 26, 2004 | -16.17% Dec 13, 2017 - Apr 12, 2019 |
| #10 | -26.31% May 27, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 | -15.72% May 8, 2013 - May 13, 2014 |
| #11 | -26.31% Oct 11, 2007 - Feb 27, 2008 | -12.80% Aug 12, 2016 - Jul 20, 2017 |
| #12 | -24.67% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2003 | -11.32% Jul 6, 2007 - Sep 18, 2007 |
| #13 | -19.95% Jul 2, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 | -10.72% Feb 16, 2000 - Mar 21, 2000 |
| #14 | -19.89% Apr 4, 2022 - May 17, 2022 | -10.10% Jul 15, 2011 - Aug 31, 2011 |
| #15 | -19.15% Aug 15, 2022 - Sep 14, 2022 | -9.15% Nov 26, 1999 - Dec 6, 1999 |
Correlation
Correlation between SQM and BCE is 0.78 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
SQM vs BCE dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SQM | BCE |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.44% | 2.76% |
| 2025 | 0.18% | 6.98% |
| 2024 | 0.59% | 12.47% |
| 2023 | 8.34% | 7.29% |
| 2022 | 9.66% | 6.39% |
| 2021 | 3.92% | 5.37% |
| 2020 | 1.64% | 5.82% |
| 2019 | 4.55% | 5.16% |
| 2018 | 5.37% | 5.84% |
| 2017 | 2.73% | 4.63% |
| 2016 | 4.77% | 5.15% |
| 2015 | 2.00% | 6.00% |
| 2014 | 4.71% | 5.02% |
| 2013 | 3.21% | 5.23% |
| 2012 | 1.69% | 5.20% |
| 2011 | 1.40% | 4.96% |
| 2010 | 0.87% | 4.95% |
| 2009 | 2.70% | 5.47% |
| 2008 | 3.71% | 3.56% |
| 2007 | 2.01% | 3.53% |
| 2006 | 1.76% | 4.46% |
| 2005 | 1.49% | 5.10% |
| 2004 | 1.21% | 4.12% |
| 2003 | 1.20% | 3.89% |
| 2002 | 1.88% | 4.22% |
| 2001 | 2.16% | 2.54% |
| 2000 | 42.10% | 304.77% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 0.38% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks