EWM vs HCRB

Comparison between ISHARES MSCI MALAYSIA ETF (EWM, ETF) and HARTFORD CORE BOND ETF (HCRB, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceEWM has outperformed HCRB, delivering a return of +4.6% compared to +0.1%

EWM vs HCRB - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	EWM(ETF)	HCRB(ETF)
Net Assets	$366M	$366M
Expense Ratio	0.50%	0.29%
Max Drawdown	71.46%	24.16%
Sharpe Ratio	1.18	0.29
5Y Beta	0.47	0.03
5Y Dividends CAGR	1.67%	14.21%

Net Assets

Winner

EWM

$366M

HCRB

$366M

Expense Ratio

EWM

0.50%

Winner

HCRB

0.29%

Max Drawdown

EWM

71.46%

Winner

HCRB

24.16%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

EWM

1.18

HCRB

0.29

5Y Beta

EWM

0.47

Winner

HCRB

0.03

5Y Dividends CAGR

EWM

1.67%

Winner

HCRB

14.21%

EWM vs HCRB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	EWM	HCRB
1 month	-5.55%	+0.69%
3 months	-6.19%	+0.76%
6 months	+0.76%	+0.48%
1 year	+19.23%	+4.33%
5 years(CAGR)	+4.57%	+0.07%
10 years(CAGR)	+2.28%	N/A
Max(CAGR)	+5.26%	+0.81%

EWM

-5.55%

Winner

HCRB

+0.69%

EWM

-6.19%

Winner

HCRB

+0.76%

Winner

EWM

+0.76%

HCRB

+0.48%

Winner

EWM

+19.23%

HCRB

+4.33%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

EWM

+4.57%

HCRB

+0.07%

10Y(CAGR)

EWM

+2.28%

HCRB

N/A

Max(CAGR)

Winner

EWM

+5.26%

HCRB

+0.81%

EWM vs HCRB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	EWM	HCRB
2026	+0.72%	+0.46%
2025	+16.66%	+7.07%
2024	+20.51%	+2.72%
2023	-2.49%	+6.30%
2022	-5.72%	-14.04%
2021	-6.13%	-1.72%
2020	+1.74%	+6.78%
2019	-1.18%	N/A
2018	-7.09%	N/A
2017	+24.23%	N/A
2016	-0.83%	N/A
2015	-18.80%	N/A
2014	-9.26%	N/A
2013	+7.09%	N/A
2012	+13.35%	N/A
2011	-3.80%	N/A
2010	+34.92%	N/A
2009	+44.85%	N/A
2008	-39.09%	N/A
2007	+41.48%	N/A
2006	+36.15%	N/A
2005	+0.85%	N/A
2004	+14.35%	N/A
2003	+29.61%	N/A
2002	+1.25%	N/A
2001	+6.98%	N/A
2000	-31.70%	N/A
1999	+29.88%	N/A

EWM vs HCRB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for EWM was -52.14%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 661 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for HCRB was -19.91%, occurring on Oct 20, 2022. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current EWM drawdown is -10.82%. The current HCRB drawdown is -1.67%.

Rank	EWM	HCRB
#1	-52.14% Jan 14, 2008 - Aug 27, 2010	-19.91% Aug 4, 2020 - Oct 20, 2022
#2	-51.81% Jan 18, 2000 - Jul 21, 2005	-7.21% Mar 9, 2020 - Apr 30, 2020
#3	-50.35% Aug 27, 2014 - Mar 19, 2020	-0.86% Apr 30, 2020 - May 20, 2020
#4	-22.25% Jul 7, 2011 - Sep 14, 2012	-0.37% May 29, 2020 - Jun 8, 2020
#5	-18.11% Feb 23, 2007 - Apr 3, 2007	-0.32% Jun 10, 2020 - Jun 15, 2020
#6	-16.67% Jan 3, 2000 - Jan 13, 2000	-0.23% Jun 22, 2020 - Jun 26, 2020
#7	-16.57% May 18, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007	-0.23% Feb 28, 2020 - Mar 3, 2020
#8	-16.13% May 14, 2013 - Jul 2, 2014	-0.21% Jul 23, 2020 - Jul 29, 2020
#9	-13.60% May 10, 2006 - Nov 2, 2006	-0.18% Jul 9, 2020 - Jul 14, 2020
#10	-8.42% Aug 9, 2005 - Feb 3, 2006	-0.13% May 22, 2020 - May 27, 2020
#11	-7.80% Jan 17, 2013 - Apr 9, 2013	-0.12% May 27, 2020 - May 29, 2020
#12	-7.63% Oct 31, 2007 - Dec 6, 2007	-0.09% May 20, 2020 - May 22, 2020
#13	-7.04% Jan 13, 2011 - Apr 1, 2011	-0.07% Feb 25, 2020 - Feb 28, 2020
#14	-6.00% Dec 6, 2007 - Jan 3, 2008	-0.06% Mar 3, 2020 - Mar 5, 2020
#15	-5.42% Nov 4, 2010 - Dec 29, 2010	-0.05% Jul 16, 2020 - Jul 20, 2020

Correlation

Correlation between EWM and HCRB is 0.62 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.62

-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

EWM vs HCRB dividend yield comparison.

Year	EWM	HCRB
2026	2.11%	1.65%
2025	3.41%	4.12%
2024	3.32%	4.15%
2023	3.47%	3.39%
2022	3.00%	2.17%
2021	6.48%	1.47%
2020	1.89%	1.81%
2019	2.91%	0.00%
2018	3.84%	0.00%
2017	5.58%	0.00%
2016	5.97%	0.00%
2015	37.54%	0.00%
2014	4.03%	0.00%
2013	3.03%	0.00%
2012	1.58%	0.00%
2011	4.46%	0.00%
2010	2.40%	0.00%
2009	2.30%	0.00%
2008	5.21%	0.00%
2007	3.19%	0.00%
2006	2.15%	0.00%
2005	4.23%	0.00%
2004	2.20%	0.00%
2003	1.61%	0.00%
2002	1.86%	0.00%
2001	1.48%	0.00%
2000	1.35%	0.00%