EWM vs BBH
Comparison between ISHARES MSCI MALAYSIA ETF (EWM, ETF) and VANECK BIOTECH ETF (BBH, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceEWM has outperformed BBH, delivering a return of +4.8% compared to -0.2%
EWM vs BBH - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
EWM vs BBH - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
EWM vs BBH - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | EWM | BBH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +2.43% | -1.36% |
| 2025 | +16.66% | +21.12% |
| 2024 | +20.51% | -6.57% |
| 2023 | -2.49% | +4.69% |
| 2022 | -5.72% | -13.94% |
| 2021 | -6.13% | +12.14% |
| 2020 | +1.74% | +21.96% |
| 2019 | -1.18% | +25.85% |
| 2018 | -7.09% | -12.90% |
| 2017 | +24.23% | +14.01% |
| 2016 | -1.78% | -12.74% |
| 2015 | -35.68% | +9.32% |
| 2014 | -11.76% | +30.02% |
| 2013 | +4.67% | +59.99% |
| 2012 | +11.96% | +46.06% |
| 2011 | -6.88% | +45.19% |
| 2010 | +32.31% | +1.24% |
| 2009 | +42.13% | +122.88% |
| 2008 | -41.04% | +19.06% |
| 2007 | +38.03% | +3.98% |
| 2006 | +33.96% | +2.06% |
| 2005 | -2.23% | +32.54% |
| 2004 | +12.51% | +12.42% |
| 2003 | +28.00% | +55.19% |
| 2002 | -0.13% | -35.25% |
| 2001 | +5.72% | -17.55% |
| 2000 | -32.30% | +16.55% |
| 1999 | +29.88% | +37.45% |
EWM vs BBH Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for EWM was -62.32%, occurring on Mar 19, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for BBH was -72.70%, occurring on Jul 10, 2002. Recovery took 1914 trading sessions.
The current EWM drawdown is -31.19%. The current BBH drawdown is -12.93%.
| Rank | EWM | BBH |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -62.32% May 14, 2013 - Mar 19, 2020 | -72.70% Mar 3, 2000 - Oct 15, 2007 |
| #2 | -52.81% Jan 14, 2008 - Sep 14, 2010 | -39.86% Aug 9, 2021 - Jun 13, 2022 |
| #3 | -52.23% Jan 18, 2000 - May 4, 2006 | -33.76% Jul 20, 2015 - Dec 20, 2019 |
| #4 | -22.25% Jul 7, 2011 - Jan 10, 2013 | -25.88% Aug 15, 2008 - Apr 1, 2009 |
| #5 | -18.11% Feb 23, 2007 - Apr 3, 2007 | -22.00% Feb 24, 2014 - Aug 26, 2014 |
| #6 | -16.67% Jan 3, 2000 - Jan 13, 2000 | -20.88% Feb 21, 2020 - Apr 17, 2020 |
| #7 | -16.57% May 18, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 | -19.68% Mar 22, 2010 - Apr 11, 2011 |
| #8 | -13.60% May 10, 2006 - Nov 2, 2006 | -18.37% Jul 1, 2011 - Oct 27, 2011 |
| #9 | -7.80% Jan 17, 2013 - Apr 9, 2013 | -14.79% Jul 20, 2020 - Dec 17, 2020 |
| #10 | -7.63% Oct 31, 2007 - Dec 6, 2007 | -14.49% Feb 12, 2021 - Jun 9, 2021 |
| #11 | -7.51% Dec 6, 2007 - Jan 7, 2008 | -13.29% Jan 21, 2000 - Feb 8, 2000 |
| #12 | -7.04% Jan 13, 2011 - Apr 1, 2011 | -12.91% Oct 15, 2007 - Jul 8, 2008 |
| #13 | -5.42% Nov 4, 2010 - Dec 31, 2010 | -11.98% May 14, 2013 - Jul 11, 2013 |
| #14 | -4.49% Nov 10, 1999 - Dec 13, 1999 | -11.41% Dec 30, 1999 - Jan 10, 2000 |
| #15 | -4.18% Dec 11, 2006 - Jan 4, 2007 | -11.38% Jul 29, 2009 - Jan 8, 2010 |
Correlation
Correlation between EWM and BBH is 0.24 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
EWM vs BBH dividend yield comparison.
| Year | EWM | BBH |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.08% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 3.41% | 0.51% |
| 2024 | 3.32% | 0.80% |
| 2023 | 3.47% | 0.43% |
| 2022 | 3.00% | 0.47% |
| 2021 | 6.48% | 0.21% |
| 2020 | 1.89% | 0.36% |
| 2019 | 2.91% | 0.34% |
| 2018 | 3.84% | 0.50% |
| 2017 | 5.58% | 0.55% |
| 2016 | 4.85% | 0.30% |
| 2015 | 9.39% | 0.27% |
| 2014 | 1.01% | 0.00% |
| 2013 | 0.76% | 0.00% |
| 2012 | 0.40% | 0.34% |
| 2011 | 1.11% | 31.04% |
| 2010 | 0.60% | 0.07% |
| 2009 | 0.58% | 261.26% |
| 2008 | 1.30% | 10.93% |
| 2007 | 0.80% | 18.70% |
| 2006 | 0.54% | 12.59% |
| 2005 | 1.06% | 0.01% |
| 2004 | 0.55% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 0.40% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 0.46% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 0.37% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.34% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks