StockComparison Logo
vs

ETD vs CIVB

Comparison between Ethan Allen Interiors Inc (ETD, Company) and Civista Bancshares Inc (CIVB, Company).

ETD is from the Consumer Cyclical sector, while CIVB is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceCIVB has outperformed ETD, delivering a return of +7.9% compared to +4.8%

ETD vs CIVB - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
ETD
$581M
Winner
CIVB
$583M
Max Drawdown
Winner
ETD
84.68%
CIVB
90.89%
Sharpe Ratio
ETD
-0.70
Winner
CIVB
1.23
5Y Beta
ETD
0.80
Winner
CIVB
0.64
Industry
ETD
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
CIVB
Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio
ETD
14.39
Winner
CIVB
10.13
Forward P/E
ETD
10.50
Winner
CIVB
9.53
PEG Ratio
ETD
1.99
Winner
CIVB
0.32
Dividend Yield
Winner
ETD
6.83%
CIVB
2.42%
5Y Dividends CAGR
ETD
5.17%
Winner
CIVB
8.76%
5Y EPS CAGR
ETD
6.08%
Winner
CIVB
18.98%
Debt to Equity
ETD
0.00%
CIVB
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
ETD
7.69%
Winner
CIVB
8.66%
P/S Ratio
Winner
ETD
0.98
CIVB
3.34
P/B Ratio
ETD
1.23
Winner
CIVB
1.07

ETD vs CIVB - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
ETD
+3.92%
CIVB
+3.17%
3M
ETD
+2.22%
Winner
CIVB
+16.16%
6M
ETD
-3.51%
Winner
CIVB
+25.25%
1Y
ETD
-19.22%
Winner
CIVB
+36.40%
5Y(CAGR)
ETD
+4.77%
Winner
CIVB
+7.87%
10Y(CAGR)
ETD
+1.44%
Winner
CIVB
+9.77%
Max(CAGR)
ETD
+1.95%
Winner
CIVB
+4.50%

ETD vs CIVB - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearETDCIVB
2026+2.18%+31.20%
2025-12.45%+12.54%
2024-5.25%+19.02%
2023+28.78%-11.16%
2022+6.82%-8.50%
2021+43.20%+41.05%
2020+14.00%-25.07%
2019+16.91%+43.00%
2018-35.99%-19.48%
2017-21.35%+15.14%
2016+39.59%+66.47%
2015-7.75%+28.12%
2014+4.79%+59.93%
2013+14.53%+23.96%
2012+8.46%+32.89%
2011+15.40%+1.56%
2010+47.76%-14.41%
2009-4.93%-23.15%
2008-46.89%-53.83%
2007-19.19%-24.22%
2006-1.36%+6.60%
2005-5.38%-14.43%
2004+6.65%-16.04%
2003+18.13%+22.69%
2002-15.03%+13.73%
2001+35.34%+14.08%
2000+11.63%N/A
1999-8.08%N/A

ETD vs CIVB Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for ETD was -82.92%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2675 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CIVB was -87.15%, occurring on Oct 7, 2011. Recovery took 3458 trading sessions.

The current ETD drawdown is -23.99%. The current CIVB drawdown is -2.65%.

RankETDCIVB
#1-82.92%
Apr 26, 2006 - Dec 8, 2016
-87.15%
Apr 28, 2003 - Feb 3, 2017
#2-73.68%
Dec 20, 2016 - Apr 28, 2021
-53.27%
Jun 6, 2018 - Jun 7, 2021
#3-41.16%
Nov 16, 1999 - Jan 31, 2001
-42.06%
Nov 23, 2021 - May 2, 2025
#4-36.92%
Mar 28, 2024 - May 13, 2026
-24.00%
Oct 12, 2001 - Aug 22, 2002
#5-35.40%
Jan 4, 2002 - Jan 14, 2004
-22.85%
Jul 3, 2025 - Feb 4, 2026
#6-31.16%
Nov 12, 2004 - Jan 26, 2006
-21.11%
Jan 31, 2001 - Jul 9, 2001
#7-31.15%
Feb 2, 2001 - Nov 14, 2001
-16.43%
Feb 14, 2017 - Oct 10, 2017
#8-30.59%
May 10, 2021 - Nov 8, 2022
-11.49%
Feb 5, 2026 - Apr 24, 2026
#9-26.54%
Aug 3, 2023 - Mar 27, 2024
-11.33%
Nov 29, 2017 - Mar 6, 2018
#10-20.97%
Mar 5, 2004 - Nov 12, 2004
-11.27%
Oct 10, 2017 - Nov 29, 2017
#11-15.96%
Feb 3, 2023 - Jul 18, 2023
-9.89%
Jun 7, 2021 - Aug 11, 2021
#12-12.89%
Nov 15, 2022 - Jan 12, 2023
-8.45%
Aug 27, 2001 - Oct 9, 2001
#13-10.53%
Jan 12, 2023 - Feb 2, 2023
-8.42%
May 15, 2025 - Jul 2, 2025
#14-8.83%
Apr 28, 2021 - May 7, 2021
-7.97%
Mar 7, 2018 - May 22, 2018
#15-8.19%
Jan 31, 2006 - Mar 27, 2006
-7.21%
Aug 11, 2021 - Oct 5, 2021

Correlation

Correlation between ETD and CIVB is 0.64 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.64
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

ETD vs CIVB dividend yield comparison.

YearETDCIVB
20263.47%1.27%
20257.92%3.06%
20246.87%3.04%
20235.95%3.31%
20226.62%2.54%
202110.61%2.13%
20203.12%2.51%
20199.34%1.75%
20186.08%1.84%
20172.66%1.14%
20161.76%1.13%
20151.87%1.56%
20141.36%1.85%
20131.22%2.30%
20121.24%2.29%
20111.01%0.74%
20101.00%0.00%
20093.35%5.38%
20086.33%15.19%
20072.88%7.97%
20062.05%5.69%
20051.72%5.74%
20048.62%4.63%
20030.69%3.67%
20020.58%5.48%
20010.38%4.66%
20000.48%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare