StockComparison Logo
vs

EMN vs SM

Comparison between Eastman Chemical Company (EMN, Company) and SM Energy Company (SM, Company).

EMN is from the Basic Materials sector, while SM is from the Energy sector.

5-Year PerformanceSM has outperformed EMN, delivering a return of +14.6% compared to -5.7%

EMN vs SM - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
EMN
$7.92B
Winner
SM
$7.96B
Max Drawdown
Winner
EMN
76.78%
SM
98.88%
Sharpe Ratio
EMN
-0.16
Winner
SM
0.70
5Y Beta
EMN
1.08
Winner
SM
1.08
Industry
EMN
Specialty Chemicals
SM
Oil & Gas E&p
P/E Ratio
Winner
EMN
16.73
SM
52.23
Forward P/E
EMN
10.71
Winner
SM
4.44
PEG Ratio
EMN
0.59
Winner
SM
0.56
Dividend Yield
Winner
EMN
4.84%
SM
2.55%
5Y Dividends CAGR
EMN
4.18%
Winner
SM
120.39%
5Y EPS CAGR
EMN
-13.84%
SM
N/A
Debt to Equity
EMN
86.87%
Winner
SM
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
EMN
6.29%
Winner
SM
27.25%
P/S Ratio
Winner
EMN
0.92
SM
2.20
P/B Ratio
EMN
1.31
Winner
SM
1.13

EMN vs SM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
EMN
-2.17%
Winner
SM
+22.25%
3M
EMN
-4.44%
Winner
SM
+15.19%
6M
EMN
+1.24%
Winner
SM
+82.14%
1Y
EMN
-10.48%
Winner
SM
+26.65%
5Y(CAGR)
EMN
-5.74%
Winner
SM
+14.64%
10Y(CAGR)
EMN
+2.80%
Winner
SM
+3.73%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
EMN
+8.39%
SM
+7.22%

EMN vs SM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearEMNSM
2026+8.12%+77.85%
2025-24.53%-51.47%
2024+5.62%+1.24%
2023+13.61%+23.24%
2022-29.62%+10.45%
2021+25.71%+363.97%
2020+32.48%-44.67%
2019+12.06%-26.03%
2018-20.50%-33.18%
2017+25.08%-35.30%
2016+15.91%+73.27%
2015-9.67%-48.64%
2014-3.84%-53.20%
2013+17.63%+52.35%
2012+72.68%-31.45%
2011-6.26%+21.34%
2010+39.87%+63.50%
2009+90.79%+56.80%
2008-45.80%-48.20%
2007+4.61%+10.56%
2006+17.28%-4.22%
2005-6.99%+82.35%
2004+51.49%+44.17%
2003+10.46%+11.53%
2002-1.78%+16.86%
2001-14.35%-30.19%
2000+9.36%+185.26%
1999+27.57%-0.33%

EMN vs SM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for EMN was -76.10%, occurring on Mar 5, 2009. Recovery took 588 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for SM was -98.85%, occurring on Apr 1, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current EMN drawdown is -36.69%. The current SM drawdown is -58.38%.

RankEMNSM
#1-76.10%
May 20, 2008 - Sep 20, 2010
-98.85%
Nov 26, 2013 - Apr 1, 2020
#2-62.79%
Mar 12, 2018 - Nov 24, 2020
-82.05%
Jun 30, 2008 - Feb 15, 2011
#3-49.36%
Jan 18, 2022 - Nov 20, 2025
-57.19%
Jan 16, 2001 - Apr 12, 2004
#4-44.78%
May 17, 2001 - Sep 30, 2004
-51.83%
Oct 27, 2011 - Oct 18, 2013
#5-37.68%
May 10, 2011 - Feb 3, 2012
-31.07%
Aug 3, 2011 - Oct 26, 2011
#6-32.81%
Jun 4, 2014 - Jun 13, 2017
-30.27%
Jul 7, 2000 - Sep 6, 2000
#7-32.78%
May 22, 2000 - Mar 7, 2001
-29.50%
Apr 21, 2006 - May 2, 2008
#8-32.38%
Jan 6, 2000 - Apr 28, 2000
-24.07%
Nov 9, 1999 - Feb 1, 2000
#9-25.48%
Mar 11, 2005 - Oct 27, 2006
-22.46%
Oct 13, 2000 - Nov 21, 2000
#10-22.79%
Jun 1, 2021 - Jan 18, 2022
-21.62%
Dec 28, 2000 - Jan 16, 2001
#11-20.90%
Feb 28, 2012 - Aug 7, 2012
-19.66%
Apr 5, 2011 - Jul 15, 2011
#12-17.42%
Jul 23, 2007 - Apr 8, 2008
-18.80%
Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 1, 2005
#13-13.98%
Feb 13, 2013 - Jul 15, 2013
-18.52%
Jan 30, 2006 - Apr 18, 2006
#14-11.60%
Oct 23, 2013 - Feb 13, 2014
-16.88%
Oct 3, 2005 - Dec 5, 2005
#15-11.57%
Dec 28, 2004 - Feb 25, 2005
-16.26%
Mar 10, 2000 - Apr 4, 2000

Correlation

Correlation between EMN and SM is 0.19 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.

0.19
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

EMN vs SM dividend yield comparison.

YearEMNSM
20262.47%1.31%
20255.22%5.35%
20243.57%1.91%
20233.54%1.55%
20223.77%0.46%
20212.34%0.07%
20202.66%0.33%
20193.18%0.89%
20183.15%0.65%
20172.26%0.45%
20162.51%0.29%
20152.46%0.51%
20141.91%0.26%
20131.55%0.12%
20121.59%0.19%
20112.53%0.14%
20102.13%0.17%
20092.92%0.29%
20085.55%0.49%
20072.88%0.26%
20062.98%0.27%
20053.41%0.27%
20043.05%0.24%
20034.45%0.35%
20024.79%0.40%
20014.51%0.47%
20003.61%0.32%
19990.92%0.20%

Select Stocks to Compare