EAF vs CMT

Comparison between GrafTech International Ltd (EAF, Company) and Core Molding Technologies (CMT, Company).

EAF is from the Industrials sector, while CMT is from the Basic Materials sector.

5-Year PerformanceCMT has outperformed EAF, delivering a return of +13.3% compared to -41.3%

EAF vs CMT - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	EAF(COMPANY)	CMT(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$204M	$203M
Max Drawdown	97.66%	96.25%
Sharpe Ratio	0.15	1.08
5Y Beta	2.04	0.68
Industry	Electrical Equipment & Parts	Specialty Chemicals
P/E Ratio	-0.90	137.50
Forward P/E	6.80	21.74
PEG Ratio	-0.02	0.36
5Y Dividends CAGR	-9.11%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	N/A	-17.77%
Debt to Equity	-360.23%	12.18%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-51.60%	-7.60%
P/S Ratio	0.39	0.73
P/B Ratio	13.86	1.26

Market Cap

Winner

EAF

$204M

CMT

$203M

Max Drawdown

EAF

97.66%

Winner

CMT

96.25%

Sharpe Ratio

EAF

0.15

Winner

CMT

1.08

5Y Beta

EAF

2.04

Winner

CMT

0.68

Industry

EAF

Electrical Equipment & Parts

CMT

Specialty Chemicals

P/E Ratio

Winner

EAF

-0.90

CMT

137.50

Forward P/E

Winner

EAF

6.80

CMT

21.74

PEG Ratio

Winner

EAF

-0.02

CMT

0.36

5Y Dividends CAGR

EAF

-9.11%

CMT

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

EAF

N/A

CMT

-17.77%

Debt to Equity

Winner

EAF

-360.23%

CMT

12.18%

Free Cash Flow Yield

EAF

-51.60%

Winner

CMT

-7.60%

P/S Ratio

Winner

EAF

0.39

CMT

0.73

P/B Ratio

EAF

13.86

Winner

CMT

1.26

EAF vs CMT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	EAF	CMT
1 month	-7.14%	+1.88%
3 months	+63.00%	+27.73%
6 months	-49.88%	+21.49%
1 year	-28.96%	+49.10%
5 years(CAGR)	-41.32%	+13.33%
10 years(CAGR)	-28.30%	+6.69%
Max(CAGR)	-28.30%	+10.68%

EAF

-7.14%

Winner

CMT

+1.88%

Winner

EAF

+63.00%

CMT

+27.73%

EAF

-49.88%

Winner

CMT

+21.49%

EAF

-28.96%

Winner

CMT

+49.10%

5Y(CAGR)

EAF

-41.32%

Winner

CMT

+13.33%

10Y(CAGR)

EAF

-28.30%

Winner

CMT

+6.69%

Max(CAGR)

EAF

-28.30%

Winner

CMT

+10.68%

EAF vs CMT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	EAF	CMT
2026	-48.08%	+27.80%
2025	-9.83%	+28.53%
2024	-16.43%	-7.08%
2023	-55.22%	+41.45%
2022	-59.64%	+52.64%
2021	+12.93%	-36.25%
2020	-5.00%	+326.67%
2019	+2.73%	-57.46%
2018	-15.50%	-65.50%
2017	N/A	+31.58%
2016	N/A	+39.67%
2015	N/A	-7.83%
2014	N/A	+4.48%
2013	N/A	+102.96%
2012	N/A	-19.66%
2011	N/A	+37.35%
2010	N/A	+100.00%
2009	N/A	-0.35%
2008	N/A	-63.38%
2007	N/A	-24.41%
2006	N/A	+29.37%
2005	N/A	+177.17%
2004	N/A	-6.10%
2003	N/A	+165.45%
2002	N/A	-25.17%
2001	N/A	+67.05%
2000	N/A	-66.67%
1999	N/A	+36.69%

EAF vs CMT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for EAF was -97.37%, occurring on Mar 12, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for CMT was -96.21%, occurring on Apr 8, 2020. Recovery took 2090 trading sessions.

The current EAF drawdown is -95.72%. The current CMT drawdown is -16.12%.

Rank	EAF	CMT
#1	-97.37% Aug 1, 2018 - Mar 12, 2026	-96.21% Jun 10, 2015 - Sep 28, 2023
#2	-15.98% Jun 14, 2018 - Jul 31, 2018	-90.74% Jun 7, 2005 - Dec 27, 2013
#3	-7.72% May 15, 2018 - Jun 8, 2018	-76.87% Dec 22, 1999 - Aug 25, 2003
#4	-4.19% Apr 23, 2018 - Apr 26, 2018	-55.95% Oct 2, 2023 - Mar 3, 2025
#5	-2.86% May 7, 2018 - May 10, 2018	-42.96% Mar 31, 2004 - Mar 22, 2005
#6	-1.72% Apr 27, 2018 - May 3, 2018	-26.50% Apr 8, 2005 - Apr 28, 2005
#7	N/A	-22.48% Mar 6, 2014 - Mar 18, 2015
#8	N/A	-19.19% Oct 10, 2003 - Jan 21, 2004
#9	N/A	-17.02% Nov 11, 1999 - Dec 2, 1999
#10	N/A	-16.01% Dec 30, 2013 - Feb 14, 2014
#11	N/A	-15.07% Jan 23, 2004 - Feb 10, 2004
#12	N/A	-13.77% Mar 28, 2005 - Apr 6, 2005
#13	N/A	-13.74% May 12, 2005 - May 20, 2005
#14	N/A	-12.89% Dec 2, 1999 - Dec 16, 1999
#15	N/A	-10.86% Nov 2, 1999 - Nov 11, 1999

Correlation

Correlation between EAF and CMT is -0.63 which considered as a moderate negative correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move in opposite directions.

-0.63

-101