CMT vs GWRS
Comparison between Core Molding Technologies (CMT, Company) and Global Water Resources Inc (GWRS, Company).
CMT is from the Basic Materials sector, while GWRS is from the Utilities sector.
5-Year PerformanceCMT has outperformed GWRS, delivering a return of +13.3% compared to -13.8%
CMT vs GWRS - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CMT vs GWRS - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CMT vs GWRS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CMT | GWRS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +27.80% | -15.26% |
| 2025 | +28.53% | -24.51% |
| 2024 | -7.08% | -8.98% |
| 2023 | +41.45% | -2.17% |
| 2022 | +52.64% | -20.66% |
| 2021 | -36.25% | +18.51% |
| 2020 | +326.67% | +13.12% |
| 2019 | -57.46% | +32.29% |
| 2018 | -65.50% | +14.18% |
| 2017 | +31.58% | +5.97% |
| 2016 | +39.67% | +48.81% |
| 2015 | -7.83% | N/A |
| 2014 | +4.48% | N/A |
| 2013 | +102.96% | N/A |
| 2012 | -19.66% | N/A |
| 2011 | +37.35% | N/A |
| 2010 | +100.00% | N/A |
| 2009 | -0.35% | N/A |
| 2008 | -63.38% | N/A |
| 2007 | -24.41% | N/A |
| 2006 | +29.37% | N/A |
| 2005 | +177.17% | N/A |
| 2004 | -6.10% | N/A |
| 2003 | +165.45% | N/A |
| 2002 | -25.17% | N/A |
| 2001 | +67.05% | N/A |
| 2000 | -66.67% | N/A |
| 1999 | +36.69% | N/A |
CMT vs GWRS Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CMT was -96.21%, occurring on Apr 8, 2020. Recovery took 2090 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for GWRS was -63.37%, occurring on May 13, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CMT drawdown is -16.12%. The current GWRS drawdown is -61.19%.
| Rank | CMT | GWRS |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -96.21% Jun 10, 2015 - Sep 28, 2023 | -63.37% Sep 3, 2021 - May 13, 2026 |
| #2 | -90.74% Jun 7, 2005 - Dec 27, 2013 | -32.86% Feb 14, 2020 - Dec 2, 2020 |
| #3 | -76.87% Dec 22, 1999 - Aug 25, 2003 | -20.18% Nov 1, 2018 - Jul 17, 2019 |
| #4 | -55.95% Oct 2, 2023 - Mar 3, 2025 | -17.62% Jul 14, 2016 - Dec 19, 2016 |
| #5 | -42.96% Mar 31, 2004 - Mar 22, 2005 | -15.71% Aug 1, 2019 - Sep 19, 2019 |
| #6 | -26.50% Apr 8, 2005 - Apr 28, 2005 | -13.21% Jul 7, 2017 - Jun 26, 2018 |
| #7 | -22.48% Mar 6, 2014 - Mar 18, 2015 | -12.78% Jan 13, 2017 - Apr 26, 2017 |
| #8 | -19.19% Oct 10, 2003 - Jan 21, 2004 | -12.22% Sep 19, 2019 - Nov 25, 2019 |
| #9 | -17.02% Nov 11, 1999 - Dec 2, 1999 | -12.17% Apr 15, 2021 - Jul 26, 2021 |
| #10 | -16.01% Dec 30, 2013 - Feb 14, 2014 | -10.10% Mar 12, 2021 - Apr 15, 2021 |
| #11 | -15.07% Jan 23, 2004 - Feb 10, 2004 | -9.92% Nov 25, 2019 - Feb 11, 2020 |
| #12 | -13.77% Mar 28, 2005 - Apr 6, 2005 | -8.60% Feb 11, 2021 - Mar 1, 2021 |
| #13 | -13.74% May 12, 2005 - May 20, 2005 | -7.95% Mar 1, 2021 - Mar 12, 2021 |
| #14 | -12.89% Dec 2, 1999 - Dec 16, 1999 | -7.39% Dec 28, 2020 - Jan 7, 2021 |
| #15 | -10.86% Nov 2, 1999 - Nov 11, 1999 | -7.23% Aug 13, 2021 - Sep 2, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between CMT and GWRS is -0.20 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (2016 - 2026)
CMT vs GWRS dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CMT | GWRS |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 1.80% |
| 2025 | 0.00% | 3.59% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 2.62% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 2.28% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 2.22% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 1.71% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 2.01% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 2.18% |
| 2018 | 1.41% | 2.80% |
| 2017 | 0.46% | 2.94% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 1.90% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks