CMT vs NNBR
Comparison between Core Molding Technologies (CMT, Company) and NN Inc (NNBR, Company).
CMT is from the Basic Materials sector, while NNBR is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceCMT has outperformed NNBR, delivering a return of +10.5% compared to -12.5%
CMT vs NNBR - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CMT vs NNBR - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CMT vs NNBR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CMT | NNBR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +24.15% | +155.22% |
| 2025 | +28.53% | -59.49% |
| 2024 | -7.08% | -19.85% |
| 2023 | +41.45% | +159.74% |
| 2022 | +52.64% | -64.37% |
| 2021 | -36.25% | -32.12% |
| 2020 | +326.67% | -28.66% |
| 2019 | -57.46% | +36.65% |
| 2018 | -65.50% | -75.87% |
| 2017 | +31.58% | +40.96% |
| 2016 | +39.67% | +30.16% |
| 2015 | -7.83% | -19.49% |
| 2014 | +4.48% | +6.47% |
| 2013 | +102.96% | +116.73% |
| 2012 | -19.66% | +52.92% |
| 2011 | +37.35% | -54.37% |
| 2010 | +100.00% | +213.71% |
| 2009 | -0.35% | +77.58% |
| 2008 | -63.38% | -74.83% |
| 2007 | -24.41% | -20.79% |
| 2006 | +29.37% | +18.50% |
| 2005 | +177.17% | -16.20% |
| 2004 | -6.10% | +4.51% |
| 2003 | +165.45% | +32.30% |
| 2002 | -25.17% | +0.27% |
| 2001 | +67.05% | +25.95% |
| 2000 | -66.67% | +39.51% |
| 1999 | +36.69% | +12.74% |
CMT vs NNBR Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CMT was -96.21%, occurring on Apr 8, 2020. Recovery took 2090 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NNBR was -96.83%, occurring on Mar 30, 2023. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CMT drawdown is -18.52%. The current NNBR drawdown is -88.94%.
| Rank | CMT | NNBR |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -96.21% Jun 10, 2015 - Sep 28, 2023 | -96.83% Oct 27, 2017 - Mar 30, 2023 |
| #2 | -90.74% Jun 7, 2005 - Dec 27, 2013 | -95.09% Aug 15, 2008 - Mar 29, 2011 |
| #3 | -76.87% Dec 22, 1999 - Aug 25, 2003 | -75.22% May 2, 2011 - Nov 22, 2013 |
| #4 | -55.95% Oct 2, 2023 - Mar 3, 2025 | -64.32% Jun 18, 2015 - May 4, 2017 |
| #5 | -42.96% Mar 31, 2004 - Mar 22, 2005 | -45.02% Jun 28, 2002 - Jun 30, 2003 |
| #6 | -26.50% Apr 8, 2005 - Apr 28, 2005 | -40.62% Feb 8, 2007 - May 12, 2008 |
| #7 | -22.48% Mar 6, 2014 - Mar 18, 2015 | -40.30% Jul 23, 2014 - Jun 18, 2015 |
| #8 | -19.19% Oct 10, 2003 - Jan 21, 2004 | -37.55% Apr 4, 2000 - Jul 20, 2001 |
| #9 | -17.02% Nov 11, 1999 - Dec 2, 1999 | -30.23% Sep 19, 2003 - Jul 11, 2005 |
| #10 | -16.01% Dec 30, 2013 - Feb 14, 2014 | -28.43% Jul 20, 2001 - Dec 26, 2001 |
| #11 | -15.07% Jan 23, 2004 - Feb 10, 2004 | -26.30% Jul 26, 2005 - May 10, 2006 |
| #12 | -13.77% Mar 28, 2005 - Apr 6, 2005 | -20.45% May 10, 2006 - Feb 8, 2007 |
| #13 | -13.74% May 12, 2005 - May 20, 2005 | -19.06% May 4, 2017 - Oct 19, 2017 |
| #14 | -12.89% Dec 2, 1999 - Dec 16, 1999 | -18.21% Jan 7, 2014 - Apr 2, 2014 |
| #15 | -10.86% Nov 2, 1999 - Nov 11, 1999 | -17.94% Dec 31, 2001 - Apr 29, 2002 |
Correlation
Correlation between CMT and NNBR is 0.29 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2019)
CMT vs NNBR dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CMT | NNBR |
|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 0.00% | 2.27% |
| 2018 | 1.41% | 4.17% |
| 2017 | 0.46% | 1.01% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 1.47% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 1.76% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 1.36% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 1.19% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 10.48% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 3.40% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 2.57% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 3.02% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 2.42% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 2.55% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 3.20% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 2.87% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 3.46% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.10% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks