CX vs TU
Comparison between Cemex S.A.B. De C.V. (CX, Company) and Telus Corp (TU, Company).
CX is from the Basic Materials sector, while TU is from the Communication Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceCX has outperformed TU, delivering a return of +7.5% compared to -7.1%
CX vs TU - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CX vs TU - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CX vs TU - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CX | TU |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +4.37% | -10.09% |
| 2025 | +104.18% | +4.57% |
| 2024 | -25.13% | -18.87% |
| 2023 | +88.11% | -2.16% |
| 2022 | -39.37% | -14.39% |
| 2021 | +31.40% | +23.83% |
| 2020 | +34.64% | +7.03% |
| 2019 | -22.00% | +21.95% |
| 2018 | -37.73% | -8.14% |
| 2017 | -1.27% | +24.89% |
| 2016 | +59.68% | +23.85% |
| 2015 | -41.25% | -18.53% |
| 2014 | -4.16% | +9.58% |
| 2013 | +23.75% | +9.43% |
| 2012 | +90.63% | +26.46% |
| 2011 | -46.86% | +28.10% |
| 2010 | -5.97% | +44.95% |
| 2009 | +27.97% | +16.56% |
| 2008 | -63.68% | -38.58% |
| 2007 | -22.35% | +13.05% |
| 2006 | +11.45% | +11.84% |
| 2005 | +69.01% | +45.43% |
| 2004 | +42.92% | +54.21% |
| 2003 | +23.50% | +85.03% |
| 2002 | -12.01% | -21.96% |
| 2001 | +42.94% | -38.82% |
| 2000 | -34.04% | +15.51% |
| 1999 | +21.85% | +21.85% |
CX vs TU Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CX was -92.41%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for TU was -88.30%, occurring on Jul 26, 2002. Recovery took 1085 trading sessions.
The current CX drawdown is -42.59%. The current TU drawdown is -45.25%.
| Rank | CX | TU |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -92.41% Jun 15, 2007 - Mar 23, 2020 | -88.30% Aug 22, 2000 - Dec 17, 2004 |
| #2 | -48.40% May 17, 2002 - Apr 2, 2004 | -59.59% Jun 4, 2007 - Apr 21, 2011 |
| #3 | -36.55% Dec 30, 1999 - May 23, 2001 | -45.25% Apr 8, 2022 - Jun 24, 2026 |
| #4 | -33.50% May 8, 2006 - Jan 24, 2007 | -33.66% Feb 12, 2020 - Dec 9, 2020 |
| #5 | -28.80% Jul 27, 2001 - Mar 8, 2002 | -31.02% Nov 18, 2014 - May 22, 2017 |
| #6 | -18.76% Mar 7, 2005 - Jun 14, 2005 | -22.54% May 10, 2013 - Mar 27, 2014 |
| #7 | -14.77% Feb 21, 2007 - May 30, 2007 | -22.08% Oct 31, 2006 - Apr 20, 2007 |
| #8 | -14.60% Feb 1, 2006 - Apr 4, 2006 | -19.49% Apr 3, 2000 - Jul 18, 2000 |
| #9 | -12.32% Apr 23, 2004 - Jun 7, 2004 | -16.19% Jul 31, 2000 - Aug 22, 2000 |
| #10 | -12.12% Sep 21, 2004 - Nov 17, 2004 | -16.09% Jul 15, 2011 - Jan 3, 2012 |
| #11 | -10.56% Sep 6, 2005 - Nov 2, 2005 | -11.80% Jun 16, 2014 - Nov 17, 2014 |
| #12 | -9.47% May 23, 2001 - Jul 2, 2001 | -11.31% Sep 13, 2018 - Mar 26, 2019 |
| #13 | -9.39% Jun 21, 2004 - Sep 14, 2004 | -11.31% Jan 3, 2006 - Mar 16, 2006 |
| #14 | -9.29% Nov 11, 1999 - Dec 3, 1999 | -10.87% May 2, 2006 - Aug 1, 2006 |
| #15 | -7.94% Aug 11, 2005 - Sep 1, 2005 | -10.74% Sep 23, 2005 - Jan 3, 2006 |
Correlation
Correlation between CX and TU is -0.11 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CX vs TU dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CX | TU |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.45% | 5.47% |
| 2025 | 0.77% | 9.01% |
| 2024 | 1.10% | 8.35% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 6.02% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 5.39% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 4.31% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 4.51% |
| 2019 | 2.63% | 4.37% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 5.19% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 5.20% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 5.78% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 6.08% |
| 2014 | 4.87% | 4.22% |
| 2013 | 3.77% | 3.95% |
| 2012 | 3.17% | 3.75% |
| 2011 | 6.54% | 4.12% |
| 2010 | 4.06% | 4.59% |
| 2009 | 3.30% | 6.10% |
| 2008 | 9.14% | 6.42% |
| 2007 | 2.88% | 3.93% |
| 2006 | 1.96% | 3.23% |
| 2005 | 2.02% | 2.48% |
| 2004 | 2.80% | 2.63% |
| 2003 | 3.98% | 3.76% |
| 2002 | 4.76% | 6.70% |
| 2001 | 3.64% | 9.90% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 4.54% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.01% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks