StockComparison Logo
vs

CTSH vs PPL

Comparison between Cognizant Technology Solutions Corp - Class A (CTSH, Company) and PPL Corp (PPL, Company).

CTSH is from the Technology sector, while PPL is from the Utilities sector.

5-Year PerformancePPL has outperformed CTSH, delivering a return of +7.2% compared to -3.3%

CTSH vs PPL - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CTSH
$26B
PPL
$26B
Max Drawdown
CTSH
71.38%
Winner
PPL
66.30%
Sharpe Ratio
CTSH
-0.37
Winner
PPL
-0.14
5Y Beta
CTSH
0.67
Winner
PPL
0.12
Industry
CTSH
Information Technology Services
PPL
Utilities - Regulated Electric
P/E Ratio
Winner
CTSH
12.03
PPL
21.41
Forward P/E
Winner
CTSH
9.69
PPL
18.05
PEG Ratio
Winner
CTSH
0.88
PPL
1.01
Dividend Yield
CTSH
2.33%
Winner
PPL
3.16%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
CTSH
12.05%
PPL
-3.52%
5Y EPS CAGR
CTSH
10.11%
PPL
N/A
Debt to Equity
Winner
CTSH
3.77%
PPL
133.28%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
CTSH
9.34%
PPL
-6.17%
P/S Ratio
Winner
CTSH
1.24
PPL
2.82
P/B Ratio
Winner
CTSH
1.72
PPL
1.76

CTSH vs PPL - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
CTSH
+37.52%
PPL
-4.13%
3M
Winner
CTSH
+11.54%
PPL
-5.38%
6M
CTSH
-25.35%
Winner
PPL
-2.12%
1Y
CTSH
-18.12%
Winner
PPL
-1.19%
5Y(CAGR)
CTSH
-3.29%
Winner
PPL
+7.20%
10Y(CAGR)
CTSH
+0.84%
Winner
PPL
+3.86%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CTSH
+16.62%
PPL
+8.30%

CTSH vs PPL - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCTSHPPL
2026-29.21%+0.14%
2025+10.38%+12.33%
2024+5.04%+22.12%
2023+33.43%-3.71%
2022-35.16%+0.06%
2021+13.13%+15.45%
2020+34.18%-15.65%
2019-0.47%+34.47%
2018-9.57%-1.96%
2017+26.47%-5.14%
2016-3.61%+5.49%
2015+13.95%+6.22%
2014+6.56%+28.04%
2013+32.62%+8.59%
2012+12.42%+4.47%
2011-14.66%+16.43%
2010+56.60%-14.58%
2009+137.08%+8.19%
2008-43.97%-37.60%
2007-12.71%+47.17%
2006+52.28%+23.54%
2005+20.18%+14.57%
2004+79.90%+26.13%
2003+89.51%+29.08%
2002+88.30%+3.96%
2001+23.70%-17.56%
2000-24.36%+111.75%
1999+114.82%-14.46%

CTSH vs PPL Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CTSH was -71.38%, occurring on Oct 8, 2001. Recovery took 653 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for PPL was -55.36%, occurring on Jul 23, 2002. Recovery took 926 trading sessions.

The current CTSH drawdown is -35.54%. The current PPL drawdown is -12.34%.

RankCTSHPPL
#1-71.38%
Mar 28, 2000 - Nov 4, 2002
-55.36%
May 23, 2001 - Feb 1, 2005
#2-69.06%
Feb 7, 2007 - Jan 13, 2010
-53.53%
Jan 9, 2008 - Feb 1, 2016
#3-56.12%
Feb 14, 2025 - Jun 30, 2026
-48.68%
Jan 29, 2020 - Aug 1, 2024
#4-49.77%
Mar 15, 2018 - May 3, 2021
-33.86%
Sep 11, 2017 - Dec 13, 2019
#5-43.77%
Mar 22, 2022 - Feb 13, 2025
-29.85%
Nov 1, 1999 - Jul 31, 2000
#6-35.68%
Dec 22, 1999 - Feb 8, 2000
-24.01%
Dec 26, 2000 - Feb 21, 2001
#7-34.31%
Apr 29, 2011 - Sep 18, 2013
-17.99%
Jun 20, 2016 - May 4, 2017
#8-31.60%
Oct 28, 2015 - Jul 20, 2017
-14.44%
Oct 3, 2005 - Jul 3, 2006
#9-30.65%
Dec 23, 2002 - Jul 2, 2003
-13.29%
Apr 9, 2026 - Jun 1, 2026
#10-28.10%
Jan 23, 2004 - Sep 9, 2004
-13.28%
Oct 2, 2000 - Dec 20, 2000
#11-25.36%
Mar 9, 2000 - Mar 24, 2000
-12.07%
Sep 11, 2000 - Sep 27, 2000
#12-19.21%
Mar 7, 2014 - Nov 7, 2014
-11.69%
Oct 15, 2025 - Feb 13, 2026
#13-18.87%
May 3, 2021 - Nov 12, 2021
-10.91%
Aug 8, 2007 - Dec 4, 2007
#14-17.85%
Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 15, 2005
-9.04%
Nov 27, 2024 - Feb 24, 2025
#15-17.00%
Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 9, 2000
-8.86%
Mar 8, 2001 - Apr 9, 2001

Correlation

Correlation between CTSH and PPL is 0.88 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.88
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CTSH vs PPL dividend yield comparison.

YearCTSHPPL
20261.16%1.65%
20251.49%3.11%
20241.56%3.17%
20231.54%3.54%
20221.89%2.99%
20211.08%5.52%
20201.07%5.89%
20191.29%4.60%
20181.26%5.79%
20170.63%5.11%
20160.00%4.46%
20150.00%11.74%
20140.00%4.10%
20130.00%4.89%
20120.00%5.03%
20110.00%4.76%
20100.00%5.32%
20090.00%4.27%
20080.00%4.37%
20070.00%2.34%
20060.00%3.07%
20050.00%3.27%
20040.00%3.08%
20030.00%3.52%
20020.00%4.15%
20010.00%3.04%
20000.00%2.35%
19990.00%1.09%

Select Stocks to Compare