StockComparison Logo
vs

CTAS vs CL

Comparison between Cintas Corporation (CTAS, Company) and Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL, Company).

CTAS is from the Industrials sector, while CL is from the Consumer Defensive sector.

5-Year PerformanceCTAS has outperformed CL, delivering a return of +15.4% compared to +4.1%

CTAS vs CL - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
CTAS
$72B
Winner
CL
$72B
Max Drawdown
CTAS
67.75%
Winner
CL
34.23%
Sharpe Ratio
CTAS
-1.16
Winner
CL
-0.08
5Y Beta
CTAS
0.59
Winner
CL
0.02
Industry
CTAS
Specialty Business Services
CL
Household & Personal Products
P/E Ratio
CTAS
37.38
Winner
CL
25.83
Forward P/E
CTAS
33.67
Winner
CL
23.20
PEG Ratio
Winner
CTAS
3.89
CL
798.41
Dividend Yield
CTAS
0.96%
Winner
CL
2.33%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
CTAS
11.82%
CL
3.38%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
CTAS
15.38%
CL
5.50%
Debt to Equity
Winner
CTAS
55.48%
CL
5473.79%
Free Cash Flow Yield
CTAS
2.48%
Winner
CL
6.02%
P/S Ratio
CTAS
6.53
Winner
CL
3.38
P/B Ratio
Winner
CTAS
15.03
CL
488.83

CTAS vs CL - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
CTAS
+3.82%
CL
+2.79%
3M
CTAS
-9.10%
Winner
CL
+0.96%
6M
CTAS
-6.81%
Winner
CL
+15.48%
1Y
CTAS
-20.71%
Winner
CL
+3.07%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CTAS
+15.40%
CL
+4.14%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CTAS
+23.52%
CL
+4.80%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CTAS
+12.61%
CL
+6.38%

CTAS vs CL - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCTASCL
2026-5.01%+18.06%
2025+4.13%-10.65%
2024+24.46%+15.10%
2023+35.60%+3.31%
2022+7.60%-4.60%
2021+30.13%+3.50%
2020+31.88%+28.50%
2019+62.22%+19.15%
2018+8.31%-18.85%
2017+35.46%+17.71%
2016+32.58%+3.40%
2015+17.39%-1.35%
2014+36.02%+9.94%
2013+43.96%+25.47%
2012+17.86%+17.62%
2011+26.66%+18.91%
2010+9.94%-0.53%
2009+11.53%+21.54%
2008-27.16%-9.37%
2007-16.06%+21.12%
2006-3.44%+21.38%
2005-4.02%+12.05%
2004-11.61%+5.04%
2003+7.44%-5.45%
2002-5.38%-7.80%
2001-4.28%-6.47%
2000+53.86%+4.85%
1999-12.73%+5.16%

CTAS vs CL Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CTAS was -65.30%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2829 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CL was -34.06%, occurring on Mar 10, 2000. Recovery took 250 trading sessions.

The current CTAS drawdown is -22.51%. The current CL drawdown is -13.23%.

RankCTASCL
#1-65.30%
May 14, 2002 - Aug 8, 2013
-34.06%
Dec 31, 1999 - Dec 27, 2000
#2-48.38%
Feb 19, 2020 - Jul 29, 2020
-31.06%
Sep 12, 2008 - Oct 6, 2009
#3-39.89%
Nov 1, 1999 - Apr 4, 2000
-30.00%
Dec 27, 2000 - Apr 26, 2006
#4-36.22%
Dec 26, 2000 - May 7, 2002
-29.07%
Sep 4, 2024 - Nov 3, 2025
#5-27.67%
Jun 6, 2025 - May 13, 2026
-23.76%
Jan 22, 2018 - Jul 29, 2019
#6-27.09%
Sep 6, 2018 - Apr 24, 2019
-22.57%
Feb 10, 2020 - Jul 30, 2020
#7-23.85%
Dec 10, 2021 - Nov 22, 2022
-18.36%
Dec 31, 2021 - Jan 23, 2024
#8-23.77%
Jun 2, 2000 - Nov 7, 2000
-14.92%
Jan 9, 2008 - Sep 12, 2008
#9-19.60%
Nov 26, 2024 - May 27, 2025
-14.57%
Mar 5, 2015 - Mar 17, 2016
#10-16.42%
Apr 4, 2000 - Apr 25, 2000
-13.66%
Sep 6, 2016 - Feb 23, 2017
#11-13.75%
Dec 1, 2015 - May 24, 2016
-13.22%
Dec 1, 2020 - Dec 28, 2021
#12-13.73%
Nov 27, 2000 - Dec 26, 2000
-12.99%
Dec 2, 2009 - Apr 29, 2011
#13-13.71%
Nov 16, 2020 - Jun 22, 2021
-12.89%
Jul 29, 2019 - Feb 3, 2020
#14-12.80%
Sep 6, 2016 - Dec 5, 2016
-11.92%
Nov 1, 1999 - Dec 22, 1999
#15-12.41%
May 16, 2000 - May 30, 2000
-10.44%
May 16, 2013 - Oct 16, 2013

Correlation

Correlation between CTAS and CL is 0.85 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.85
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

CTAS vs CL dividend yield comparison.

YearCTASCL
20260.52%1.16%
20250.89%2.61%
20240.80%2.18%
20230.83%2.40%
20220.93%2.36%
20210.77%2.10%
20200.99%2.05%
20190.95%2.48%
20181.22%2.79%
20171.04%2.11%
20161.15%2.37%
20151.15%2.25%
20142.17%2.05%
20131.29%2.04%
20121.56%2.33%
20111.55%2.46%
20103.47%2.53%
20091.80%2.09%
20081.98%2.28%
20071.16%1.80%
20060.88%1.92%
20050.78%2.02%
20040.66%1.88%
20030.54%1.80%
20020.55%1.37%
20010.46%1.17%
20000.35%0.98%

Select Stocks to Compare