CL vs PG
Comparison between Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL, Company) and Procter & Gamble Company (PG, Company).
Both CL and PG are from the Consumer Defensive sector.
5-Year PerformancePG has outperformed CL, delivering a return of +4.1% compared to +3.5%
CL vs PG - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CL vs PG - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CL vs PG - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +15.43% | +4.84% |
| 2025 | -10.65% | -11.37% |
| 2024 | +15.10% | +15.51% |
| 2023 | +3.31% | -0.85% |
| 2022 | -4.60% | -4.65% |
| 2021 | +3.50% | +21.69% |
| 2020 | +28.50% | +15.53% |
| 2019 | +19.15% | +40.68% |
| 2018 | -18.85% | +5.02% |
| 2017 | +17.71% | +12.53% |
| 2016 | +3.40% | +10.82% |
| 2015 | -1.35% | -9.31% |
| 2014 | +9.94% | +16.67% |
| 2013 | +25.47% | +21.01% |
| 2012 | +17.62% | +4.99% |
| 2011 | +18.91% | +6.32% |
| 2010 | -0.53% | +8.49% |
| 2009 | +21.54% | -0.38% |
| 2008 | -9.37% | -12.44% |
| 2007 | +21.12% | +16.14% |
| 2006 | +21.38% | +11.62% |
| 2005 | +12.05% | +6.96% |
| 2004 | +5.04% | +13.39% |
| 2003 | -5.45% | +15.96% |
| 2002 | -7.80% | +9.44% |
| 2001 | -6.47% | +3.04% |
| 2000 | +4.85% | -25.49% |
| 1999 | +5.16% | +1.48% |
CL vs PG Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CL was -34.06%, occurring on Mar 10, 2000. Recovery took 250 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for PG was -54.25%, occurring on Mar 10, 2000. Recovery took 1099 trading sessions.
The current CL drawdown is -15.16%. The current PG drawdown is -15.08%.
| Rank | CL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -34.06% Dec 31, 1999 - Dec 27, 2000 | -54.25% Jan 11, 2000 - May 27, 2004 |
| #2 | -31.06% Sep 12, 2008 - Oct 6, 2009 | -38.98% Dec 12, 2007 - Dec 23, 2011 |
| #3 | -30.00% Dec 27, 2000 - Apr 26, 2006 | -25.45% Dec 26, 2014 - Aug 29, 2016 |
| #4 | -29.07% Sep 4, 2024 - Nov 3, 2025 | -23.77% Apr 28, 2022 - Jan 30, 2024 |
| #5 | -23.76% Jan 22, 2018 - Jul 29, 2019 | -23.16% Feb 6, 2020 - Jul 23, 2020 |
| #6 | -22.57% Feb 10, 2020 - Jul 30, 2020 | -22.98% Sep 20, 2017 - Nov 5, 2018 |
| #7 | -18.36% Dec 31, 2021 - Jan 23, 2024 | -21.15% Dec 2, 2024 - Jan 7, 2026 |
| #8 | -14.92% Jan 9, 2008 - Sep 12, 2008 | -14.83% Nov 13, 2020 - Jul 30, 2021 |
| #9 | -14.57% Mar 5, 2015 - Mar 17, 2016 | -14.10% Mar 10, 2006 - Aug 30, 2006 |
| #10 | -13.66% Sep 6, 2016 - Feb 23, 2017 | -12.75% Feb 3, 2022 - Apr 28, 2022 |
| #11 | -13.22% Dec 1, 2020 - Dec 28, 2021 | -11.98% Mar 13, 2012 - Aug 10, 2012 |
| #12 | -12.99% Dec 2, 2009 - Apr 29, 2011 | -10.70% Nov 25, 2013 - Aug 25, 2014 |
| #13 | -12.89% Jul 29, 2019 - Feb 3, 2020 | -9.73% Sep 8, 2004 - Dec 13, 2004 |
| #14 | -11.92% Nov 1, 1999 - Dec 22, 1999 | -9.60% Dec 14, 2018 - Jan 31, 2019 |
| #15 | -10.44% May 16, 2013 - Oct 16, 2013 | -9.15% Jan 20, 2005 - May 19, 2005 |
Correlation
Correlation between CL and PG is 0.95 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CL vs PG dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CL | PG |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.19% | 1.46% |
| 2025 | 2.61% | 2.91% |
| 2024 | 2.18% | 2.36% |
| 2023 | 2.40% | 2.55% |
| 2022 | 2.36% | 2.38% |
| 2021 | 2.10% | 2.08% |
| 2020 | 2.05% | 2.24% |
| 2019 | 2.48% | 2.37% |
| 2018 | 2.79% | 3.09% |
| 2017 | 2.11% | 2.98% |
| 2016 | 2.37% | 3.18% |
| 2015 | 2.25% | 3.31% |
| 2014 | 2.05% | 2.78% |
| 2013 | 2.04% | 2.91% |
| 2012 | 2.33% | 3.26% |
| 2011 | 2.46% | 3.08% |
| 2010 | 2.53% | 2.93% |
| 2009 | 2.09% | 2.84% |
| 2008 | 2.28% | 2.51% |
| 2007 | 1.80% | 1.85% |
| 2006 | 1.92% | 1.88% |
| 2005 | 2.02% | 1.88% |
| 2004 | 1.88% | 1.77% |
| 2003 | 1.80% | 1.73% |
| 2002 | 1.37% | 1.84% |
| 2001 | 1.17% | 1.85% |
| 2000 | 0.98% | 1.71% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks