CQP vs PUK
Comparison between Cheniere Energy Partners LP (CQP, Company) and Prudential plc (PUK, Company).
CQP is from the Energy sector, while PUK is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceCQP has outperformed PUK, delivering a return of +15.2% compared to -5.9%
CQP vs PUK - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CQP vs PUK - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CQP vs PUK - Annual Returns (2000 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CQP | PUK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +20.46% | -14.85% |
| 2025 | +1.85% | +102.41% |
| 2024 | +9.37% | -24.68% |
| 2023 | -1.11% | -19.00% |
| 2022 | +44.85% | -20.88% |
| 2021 | +29.47% | -1.20% |
| 2020 | -4.20% | -2.38% |
| 2019 | +17.88% | +29.52% |
| 2018 | +29.23% | -28.65% |
| 2017 | +7.48% | +30.01% |
| 2016 | +19.44% | -4.56% |
| 2015 | -15.36% | +0.73% |
| 2014 | +19.27% | +6.71% |
| 2013 | +41.07% | +56.31% |
| 2012 | +26.60% | +46.11% |
| 2011 | -8.85% | -2.79% |
| 2010 | +74.14% | +4.41% |
| 2009 | +242.49% | +73.80% |
| 2008 | -73.00% | -53.90% |
| 2007 | -22.58% | +3.47% |
| 2006 | N/A | +43.19% |
| 2005 | N/A | +15.14% |
| 2004 | N/A | +6.69% |
| 2003 | N/A | +22.50% |
| 2002 | N/A | -38.91% |
| 2001 | N/A | -25.12% |
| 2000 | N/A | +187.24% |
CQP vs PUK Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CQP was -78.51%, occurring on Dec 31, 2008. Recovery took 686 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for PUK was -82.51%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1352 trading sessions.
The current CQP drawdown is -8.59%. The current PUK drawdown is -31.10%.
| Rank | CQP | PUK |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -78.51% Apr 17, 2007 - Jan 5, 2010 | -82.51% May 7, 2007 - Sep 14, 2012 |
| #2 | -60.29% Sep 16, 2019 - Mar 11, 2021 | -68.74% Jan 3, 2001 - Mar 20, 2006 |
| #3 | -46.98% Jan 13, 2011 - Feb 27, 2012 | -63.59% Oct 7, 2021 - Jan 13, 2025 |
| #4 | -37.91% Jun 23, 2015 - Jan 26, 2017 | -63.54% Jan 24, 2018 - May 7, 2021 |
| #5 | -31.58% Apr 27, 2012 - Mar 22, 2013 | -41.52% May 21, 2015 - Jul 31, 2017 |
| #6 | -29.08% Nov 30, 2022 - Nov 2, 2023 | -23.52% Mar 20, 2006 - Nov 17, 2006 |
| #7 | -27.92% May 4, 2022 - Aug 25, 2022 | -20.02% May 7, 2021 - Oct 7, 2021 |
| #8 | -24.86% Nov 30, 2023 - Dec 2, 2024 | -19.39% Jul 21, 2000 - Nov 30, 2000 |
| #9 | -24.25% Apr 23, 2010 - Jul 20, 2010 | -15.09% Jan 10, 2014 - Mar 4, 2014 |
| #10 | -23.60% Apr 1, 2025 - Mar 5, 2026 | -14.02% Jan 17, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007 |
| #11 | -19.63% May 30, 2014 - Apr 30, 2015 | -13.46% May 21, 2013 - Aug 2, 2013 |
| #12 | -19.24% Mar 4, 2022 - May 4, 2022 | -13.11% Aug 25, 2014 - Jan 26, 2015 |
| #13 | -19.17% May 31, 2013 - Jul 23, 2013 | -11.07% Aug 12, 2013 - Sep 16, 2013 |
| #14 | -17.85% May 25, 2017 - May 4, 2018 | -8.82% Mar 14, 2013 - Apr 26, 2013 |
| #15 | -17.49% Sep 27, 2018 - Jan 17, 2019 | -7.41% Mar 12, 2014 - Apr 30, 2014 |
Correlation
Correlation between CQP and PUK is 0.44 which considered as a weak positive correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CQP vs PUK dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CQP | PUK |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 2.56% | 1.42% |
| 2025 | 6.15% | 1.54% |
| 2024 | 5.06% | 2.64% |
| 2023 | 8.36% | 1.72% |
| 2022 | 6.82% | 1.28% |
| 2021 | 6.30% | 4.60% |
| 2020 | 7.28% | 1.70% |
| 2019 | 6.08% | 17.06% |
| 2018 | 6.07% | 3.71% |
| 2017 | 5.79% | 2.33% |
| 2016 | 5.90% | 3.50% |
| 2015 | 6.52% | 2.62% |
| 2014 | 5.31% | 2.53% |
| 2013 | 5.93% | 2.09% |
| 2012 | 8.00% | 2.84% |
| 2011 | 9.43% | 4.05% |
| 2010 | 7.98% | 2.90% |
| 2009 | 13.17% | 2.99% |
| 2008 | 45.82% | 5.57% |
| 2007 | 5.47% | 2.42% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 2.21% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 3.02% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 6.16% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 4.28% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 5.50% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 3.03% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 0.73% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks