CNP vs NMR
Comparison between Centerpoint Energy Inc (CNP, Company) and Nomura Holdings Inc (NMR, Company).
CNP is from the Utilities sector, while NMR is from the Financial Services sector.
5-Year PerformanceNMR has outperformed CNP, delivering a return of +18.4% compared to +12.9%
CNP vs NMR - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CNP vs NMR - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CNP vs NMR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CNP | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +9.41% | +15.65% |
| 2025 | +24.67% | +53.57% |
| 2024 | +12.51% | +35.63% |
| 2023 | -0.69% | +21.20% |
| 2022 | +11.16% | -12.30% |
| 2021 | +34.27% | -17.05% |
| 2020 | -16.97% | +3.34% |
| 2019 | +1.47% | +35.43% |
| 2018 | +5.00% | -36.95% |
| 2017 | +19.83% | -0.51% |
| 2016 | +41.58% | +10.26% |
| 2015 | -18.26% | +0.64% |
| 2014 | +6.81% | -23.82% |
| 2013 | +22.42% | +29.46% |
| 2012 | +0.83% | +92.81% |
| 2011 | +32.80% | -52.04% |
| 2010 | +14.16% | -14.33% |
| 2009 | +20.29% | -11.17% |
| 2008 | -21.33% | -49.10% |
| 2007 | +4.39% | -11.80% |
| 2006 | +33.29% | -1.99% |
| 2005 | +19.86% | +34.20% |
| 2004 | +20.66% | -14.69% |
| 2003 | +19.82% | +52.55% |
| 2002 | -65.68% | -13.30% |
| 2001 | -35.14% | -29.05% |
| 2000 | +104.64% | +2.57% |
| 1999 | -15.24% | +11.76% |
CNP vs NMR Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CNP was -89.93%, occurring on Feb 25, 2003. Recovery took 3830 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NMR was -89.30%, occurring on Nov 23, 2011. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CNP drawdown is -6.93%. The current NMR drawdown is -52.09%.
| Rank | CNP | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -89.93% May 1, 2001 - Jul 22, 2016 | -89.30% Mar 31, 2000 - Nov 23, 2011 |
| #2 | -59.78% Feb 22, 2019 - Mar 4, 2022 | -20.52% Feb 11, 2000 - Mar 29, 2000 |
| #3 | -32.04% Oct 2, 2000 - Apr 17, 2001 | -11.59% Nov 26, 1999 - Jan 4, 2000 |
| #4 | -26.28% Nov 5, 1999 - Apr 24, 2000 | -11.04% Jan 4, 2000 - Jan 18, 2000 |
| #5 | -22.81% Sep 12, 2022 - Nov 19, 2024 | -4.76% Nov 12, 1999 - Nov 22, 1999 |
| #6 | -16.54% Sep 11, 2017 - Dec 13, 2018 | -4.45% Jan 24, 2000 - Jan 27, 2000 |
| #7 | -15.87% Apr 20, 2022 - Aug 15, 2022 | -4.04% Jan 18, 2000 - Jan 21, 2000 |
| #8 | -10.53% Jul 22, 2016 - Nov 28, 2016 | -3.28% Jan 31, 2000 - Feb 3, 2000 |
| #9 | -9.32% Apr 26, 2000 - May 22, 2000 | -2.21% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 10, 1999 |
| #10 | -8.40% May 7, 2025 - Aug 4, 2025 | -0.87% Jan 27, 2000 - Jan 31, 2000 |
| #11 | -7.23% Dec 13, 2018 - Jan 10, 2019 | N/A |
| #12 | -6.96% Sep 18, 2000 - Sep 26, 2000 | N/A |
| #13 | -6.93% Jun 26, 2026 - Aug 3, 2026 | N/A |
| #14 | -6.67% Oct 20, 2025 - Feb 3, 2026 | N/A |
| #15 | -6.31% May 26, 2000 - Jun 15, 2000 | N/A |
Correlation
Correlation between CNP and NMR is -0.38 which considered as a weak negative correlation - the stocks show a slight tendency to move in opposite directions.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CNP vs NMR dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CNP | NMR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.10% | 1.56% |
| 2025 | 2.30% | 4.91% |
| 2024 | 2.55% | 4.29% |
| 2023 | 2.70% | 1.20% |
| 2022 | 2.33% | 3.86% |
| 2021 | 2.33% | 0.00% |
| 2020 | 3.42% | 0.86% |
| 2019 | 4.22% | 0.00% |
| 2018 | 3.93% | 0.00% |
| 2017 | 3.77% | 1.70% |
| 2016 | 4.18% | 1.79% |
| 2015 | 5.39% | 3.34% |
| 2014 | 4.05% | 2.44% |
| 2013 | 3.58% | 1.77% |
| 2012 | 4.21% | 1.28% |
| 2011 | 3.93% | 5.11% |
| 2010 | 4.96% | 1.37% |
| 2009 | 5.24% | 0.57% |
| 2008 | 5.78% | 2.85% |
| 2007 | 3.97% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 3.62% | 2.36% |
| 2005 | 3.11% | 1.07% |
| 2004 | 3.54% | 1.08% |
| 2003 | 4.13% | 1.03% |
| 2002 | 12.59% | 1.05% |
| 2001 | 5.66% | 5.57% |
| 2000 | 3.46% | 6.49% |
| 1999 | 1.64% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks