CMT vs SILC

Comparison between Core Molding Technologies (CMT, Company) and Silicom Ltd (SILC, Company).

CMT is from the Basic Materials sector, while SILC is from the Technology sector.

5-Year PerformanceCMT has outperformed SILC, delivering a return of +10.7% compared to -2.4%

CMT vs SILC - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CMT(COMPANY)	SILC(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$200M	$199M
Max Drawdown	96.25%	98.80%
Sharpe Ratio	0.94	1.48
5Y Beta	0.68	1.00
Industry	Specialty Chemicals	Communication Equipment
P/E Ratio	135.47	-17.36
Forward P/E	21.79	10.72
PEG Ratio	0.36	1.41
5Y EPS CAGR	-17.77%	N/A
Debt to Equity	12.18%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	-7.72%	-1.68%
P/S Ratio	0.74	3.01
P/B Ratio	1.31	1.89

Market Cap

Winner

CMT

$200M

SILC

$199M

Max Drawdown

Winner

CMT

96.25%

SILC

98.80%

Sharpe Ratio

CMT

0.94

Winner

SILC

1.48

5Y Beta

Winner

CMT

0.68

SILC

1.00

Industry

CMT

Specialty Chemicals

SILC

Communication Equipment

P/E Ratio

CMT

135.47

Winner

SILC

-17.36

Forward P/E

CMT

21.79

Winner

SILC

10.72

PEG Ratio

Winner

CMT

0.36

SILC

1.41

5Y EPS CAGR

CMT

-17.77%

SILC

N/A

Debt to Equity

CMT

12.18%

Winner

SILC

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

CMT

-7.72%

Winner

SILC

-1.68%

P/S Ratio

Winner

CMT

0.74

SILC

3.01

P/B Ratio

Winner

CMT

1.31

SILC

1.89

CMT vs SILC - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CMT	SILC
1 month	+0.17%	-9.85%
3 months	-11.12%	-5.64%
6 months	+21.16%	+119.93%
1 year	+42.13%	+141.39%
5 years(CAGR)	+10.69%	-2.36%
10 years(CAGR)	+3.91%	+0.59%
Max(CAGR)	+10.41%	+12.17%

Winner

CMT

+0.17%

SILC

-9.85%

CMT

-11.12%

Winner

SILC

-5.64%

CMT

+21.16%

Winner

SILC

+119.93%

CMT

+42.13%

Winner

SILC

+141.39%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

CMT

+10.69%

SILC

-2.36%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

CMT

+3.91%

SILC

+0.59%

Max(CAGR)

CMT

+10.41%

Winner

SILC

+12.17%

CMT vs SILC - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CMT	SILC
2026	+21.53%	+180.30%
2025	+28.53%	-4.36%
2024	-7.08%	-10.92%
2023	+41.45%	-57.52%
2022	+52.64%	-16.10%
2021	-36.25%	+24.34%
2020	+326.67%	+25.22%
2019	-57.46%	-7.17%
2018	-65.50%	-53.14%
2017	+31.58%	+77.11%
2016	+39.67%	+32.00%
2015	-7.83%	-9.51%
2014	+4.48%	-21.09%
2013	+102.96%	+155.86%
2012	-19.66%	-0.72%
2011	+37.35%	-7.10%
2010	+100.00%	+115.87%
2009	-0.35%	+84.00%
2008	-63.38%	-70.67%
2007	-24.41%	+58.93%
2006	+29.37%	+10.62%
2005	+177.17%	+215.33%
2004	-6.10%	+62.87%
2003	+165.45%	+381.82%
2002	-25.17%	-65.12%
2001	+67.05%	-73.10%
2000	-66.67%	-30.60%
1999	+36.69%	+106.31%

CMT vs SILC Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CMT was -96.21%, occurring on Apr 8, 2020. Recovery took 2090 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for SILC was -98.80%, occurring on Jan 8, 2003. Recovery took 1789 trading sessions.

The current CMT drawdown is -20.24%. The current SILC drawdown is -48.13%.

Rank	CMT	SILC
#1	-96.21% Jun 10, 2015 - Sep 28, 2023	-98.80% Mar 1, 2000 - Apr 16, 2007
#2	-90.74% Jun 7, 2005 - Dec 27, 2013	-88.41% Sep 12, 2007 - Mar 8, 2013
#3	-76.87% Dec 22, 1999 - Aug 25, 2003	-84.76% Jan 3, 2018 - Aug 5, 2024
#4	-55.95% Oct 2, 2023 - Mar 3, 2025	-64.18% Mar 4, 2014 - Oct 19, 2017
#5	-42.96% Mar 31, 2004 - Mar 22, 2005	-42.41% Dec 8, 1999 - Jan 18, 2000
#6	-26.50% Apr 8, 2005 - Apr 28, 2005	-34.94% Nov 26, 1999 - Nov 30, 1999
#7	-22.48% Mar 6, 2014 - Mar 18, 2015	-30.64% Nov 30, 1999 - Dec 8, 1999
#8	-19.19% Oct 10, 2003 - Jan 21, 2004	-29.52% Apr 24, 2007 - Sep 5, 2007
#9	-17.02% Nov 11, 1999 - Dec 2, 1999	-27.29% Jul 16, 2013 - Oct 21, 2013
#10	-16.01% Dec 30, 2013 - Feb 14, 2014	-23.20% Jan 19, 2000 - Feb 7, 2000
#11	-15.07% Jan 23, 2004 - Feb 10, 2004	-17.19% Nov 5, 1999 - Nov 16, 1999
#12	-13.77% Mar 28, 2005 - Apr 6, 2005	-16.41% Feb 15, 2000 - Mar 1, 2000
#13	-13.74% May 12, 2005 - May 20, 2005	-10.52% Nov 21, 2017 - Jan 3, 2018
#14	-12.89% Dec 2, 1999 - Dec 16, 1999	-10.05% Apr 2, 2013 - Apr 23, 2013
#15	-10.86% Nov 2, 1999 - Nov 11, 1999	-9.17% Nov 12, 2013 - Dec 27, 2013