SILC vs NEN
Comparison between Silicom Ltd (SILC, Company) and New England Realty Associates LP (NEN, Company).
SILC is from the Technology sector, while NEN is from the Real Estate sector.
5-Year PerformanceNEN has outperformed SILC, delivering a return of +2.3% compared to -2.4%
SILC vs NEN - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
SILC vs NEN - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
SILC vs NEN - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | SILC | NEN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +180.30% | -11.93% |
| 2025 | -4.36% | -17.03% |
| 2024 | -10.92% | +24.04% |
| 2023 | -57.52% | +2.06% |
| 2022 | -16.10% | +6.31% |
| 2021 | +24.34% | +38.51% |
| 2020 | +25.22% | -16.64% |
| 2019 | -7.17% | +14.31% |
| 2018 | -53.14% | -20.85% |
| 2017 | +77.11% | +26.01% |
| 2016 | +32.00% | +24.41% |
| 2015 | -9.51% | +6.77% |
| 2014 | -21.09% | +10.60% |
| 2013 | +155.86% | +56.87% |
| 2012 | -0.72% | +29.58% |
| 2011 | -7.10% | +10.76% |
| 2010 | +115.87% | +26.37% |
| 2009 | +84.00% | +0.12% |
| 2008 | -70.67% | -19.22% |
| 2007 | +58.93% | -11.69% |
| 2006 | +10.62% | +7.73% |
| 2005 | +215.33% | -4.74% |
| 2004 | +62.87% | +67.23% |
| 2003 | +381.82% | +38.92% |
| 2002 | -65.12% | +47.77% |
| 2001 | -73.10% | +80.88% |
| 2000 | -30.60% | +68.13% |
| 1999 | +106.31% | -3.30% |
SILC vs NEN Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for SILC was -98.80%, occurring on Jan 8, 2003. Recovery took 1789 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for NEN was -44.21%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1234 trading sessions.
The current SILC drawdown is -48.13%. The current NEN drawdown is -29.14%.
| Rank | SILC | NEN |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.80% Mar 1, 2000 - Apr 16, 2007 | -44.21% Feb 16, 2007 - Jan 10, 2012 |
| #2 | -88.41% Sep 12, 2007 - Mar 8, 2013 | -41.90% Nov 8, 2017 - Dec 23, 2021 |
| #3 | -84.76% Jan 3, 2018 - Aug 5, 2024 | -29.14% Mar 31, 2025 - Jul 31, 2026 |
| #4 | -64.18% Mar 4, 2014 - Oct 19, 2017 | -29.11% Jun 7, 2002 - Mar 24, 2003 |
| #5 | -42.41% Dec 8, 1999 - Jan 18, 2000 | -27.38% Oct 2, 2000 - Jan 23, 2001 |
| #6 | -34.94% Nov 26, 1999 - Nov 30, 1999 | -27.22% Feb 14, 2005 - Feb 15, 2007 |
| #7 | -30.64% Nov 30, 1999 - Dec 8, 1999 | -22.66% Aug 20, 2001 - Feb 20, 2002 |
| #8 | -29.52% Apr 24, 2007 - Sep 5, 2007 | -20.83% Jan 23, 2001 - May 29, 2001 |
| #9 | -27.29% Jul 16, 2013 - Oct 21, 2013 | -20.00% Feb 9, 2000 - Mar 20, 2000 |
| #10 | -23.20% Jan 19, 2000 - Feb 7, 2000 | -18.28% Jul 12, 2001 - Aug 3, 2001 |
| #11 | -17.19% Nov 5, 1999 - Nov 16, 1999 | -18.02% Apr 14, 2022 - Aug 22, 2024 |
| #12 | -16.41% Feb 15, 2000 - Mar 1, 2000 | -15.95% Nov 6, 2003 - Jun 9, 2004 |
| #13 | -10.52% Nov 21, 2017 - Jan 3, 2018 | -12.85% Mar 20, 2000 - May 19, 2000 |
| #14 | -10.05% Apr 2, 2013 - Apr 23, 2013 | -11.96% Feb 12, 2013 - Mar 27, 2013 |
| #15 | -9.17% Nov 12, 2013 - Dec 27, 2013 | -11.87% Aug 17, 2016 - Mar 23, 2017 |
Correlation
Correlation between SILC and NEN is 0.67 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
SILC vs NEN dividend yield comparison.
| Year | SILC | NEN |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 1.43% |
| 2025 | 0.00% | 7.44% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 3.87% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 4.02% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 3.61% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 1.89% |
| 2020 | 0.00% | 2.55% |
| 2019 | 0.00% | 2.06% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 2.14% |
| 2017 | 1.43% | 2.92% |
| 2016 | 2.43% | 2.96% |
| 2015 | 3.30% | 1.97% |
| 2014 | 2.84% | 2.05% |
| 2013 | 1.20% | 2.25% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 3.37% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 3.93% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 4.24% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 5.33% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 5.16% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 4.08% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 3.41% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 3.50% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 3.07% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 5.39% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 6.15% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 3.70% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 6.20% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks