CLF vs SM
Comparison between Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF, Company) and SM Energy Company (SM, Company).
CLF is from the Basic Materials sector, while SM is from the Energy sector.
5-Year PerformanceSM has outperformed CLF, delivering a return of +11.0% compared to -7.6%
CLF vs SM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CLF vs SM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CLF vs SM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CLF | SM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.11% | +61.89% |
| 2025 | +39.20% | -51.47% |
| 2024 | -52.45% | +1.24% |
| 2023 | +21.62% | +23.24% |
| 2022 | -25.86% | +10.45% |
| 2021 | +50.97% | +363.97% |
| 2020 | +88.69% | -44.67% |
| 2019 | +10.16% | -26.03% |
| 2018 | -2.66% | -33.18% |
| 2017 | -16.26% | -35.30% |
| 2016 | +403.59% | +73.27% |
| 2015 | -77.52% | -48.64% |
| 2014 | -71.27% | -53.20% |
| 2013 | -30.80% | +52.35% |
| 2012 | -38.56% | -31.45% |
| 2011 | -23.00% | +21.34% |
| 2010 | +63.25% | +63.50% |
| 2009 | +57.60% | +56.80% |
| 2008 | -46.54% | -48.20% |
| 2007 | +112.27% | +10.56% |
| 2006 | +5.86% | -4.22% |
| 2005 | +76.79% | +82.35% |
| 2004 | +95.85% | +44.17% |
| 2003 | +147.09% | +11.53% |
| 2002 | +7.53% | +16.86% |
| 2001 | -14.70% | -30.19% |
| 2000 | -24.00% | +185.26% |
| 1999 | +8.53% | -0.33% |
CLF vs SM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CLF was -98.78%, occurring on Jan 12, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The maximum drawdown for SM was -98.85%, occurring on Apr 1, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.
The current CLF drawdown is -86.11%. The current SM drawdown is -62.11%.
| Rank | CLF | SM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -98.78% Jun 30, 2008 - Jan 12, 2016 | -98.85% Nov 26, 2013 - Apr 1, 2020 |
| #2 | -51.61% Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 15, 2002 | -82.05% Jun 30, 2008 - Feb 15, 2011 |
| #3 | -48.31% Apr 18, 2002 - Oct 13, 2003 | -57.19% Jan 16, 2001 - Apr 12, 2004 |
| #4 | -41.76% Mar 4, 2004 - Sep 2, 2004 | -51.83% Oct 27, 2011 - Oct 18, 2013 |
| #5 | -41.09% Feb 1, 2006 - Jan 30, 2007 | -31.07% Aug 3, 2011 - Oct 26, 2011 |
| #6 | -38.96% Mar 4, 2005 - Sep 28, 2005 | -30.27% Jul 7, 2000 - Sep 6, 2000 |
| #7 | -32.10% Jun 1, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007 | -29.50% Apr 21, 2006 - May 2, 2008 |
| #8 | -27.95% Oct 12, 2007 - Dec 26, 2007 | -24.07% Nov 9, 1999 - Feb 1, 2000 |
| #9 | -21.75% Jan 5, 2004 - Feb 17, 2004 | -22.46% Oct 13, 2000 - Nov 21, 2000 |
| #10 | -20.24% Oct 6, 2004 - Nov 11, 2004 | -21.62% Dec 28, 2000 - Jan 16, 2001 |
| #11 | -18.57% Dec 28, 2007 - Feb 1, 2008 | -19.66% Apr 5, 2011 - Jul 15, 2011 |
| #12 | -17.14% Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 1, 2008 | -18.80% Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 1, 2005 |
| #13 | -16.03% Sep 30, 2005 - Nov 9, 2005 | -18.52% Jan 30, 2006 - Apr 18, 2006 |
| #14 | -12.12% Jun 5, 2008 - Jun 23, 2008 | -16.88% Oct 3, 2005 - Dec 5, 2005 |
| #15 | -11.79% Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007 | -16.26% Mar 10, 2000 - Apr 4, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between CLF and SM is 0.59 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CLF vs SM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CLF | SM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 0.72% |
| 2025 | 0.00% | 5.35% |
| 2024 | 0.00% | 1.91% |
| 2023 | 0.00% | 1.55% |
| 2022 | 0.00% | 0.46% |
| 2021 | 0.00% | 0.07% |
| 2020 | 0.82% | 0.33% |
| 2019 | 3.10% | 0.89% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 0.65% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 0.45% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 0.29% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 0.51% |
| 2014 | 8.40% | 0.26% |
| 2013 | 2.29% | 0.12% |
| 2012 | 5.59% | 0.19% |
| 2011 | 1.35% | 0.14% |
| 2010 | 0.65% | 0.17% |
| 2009 | 0.55% | 0.29% |
| 2008 | 1.37% | 0.49% |
| 2007 | 0.50% | 0.26% |
| 2006 | 0.98% | 0.27% |
| 2005 | 0.68% | 0.27% |
| 2004 | 0.19% | 0.24% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 0.35% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 0.40% |
| 2001 | 2.19% | 0.47% |
| 2000 | 6.96% | 0.32% |
| 1999 | 1.21% | 0.20% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks