StockComparison Logo
vs

CLF vs SM

Comparison between Cleveland-Cliffs Inc (CLF, Company) and SM Energy Company (SM, Company).

CLF is from the Basic Materials sector, while SM is from the Energy sector.

5-Year PerformanceSM has outperformed CLF, delivering a return of +11.0% compared to -7.6%

CLF vs SM - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
CLF
$7.33B
Winner
SM
$7.34B
Max Drawdown
CLF
98.94%
Winner
SM
98.88%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CLF
1.26
SM
0.81
5Y Beta
CLF
1.92
Winner
SM
1.18
Industry
CLF
Steel
SM
Oil & Gas E&p
P/E Ratio
Winner
CLF
-5.52
SM
48.20
Forward P/E
CLF
29.67
Winner
SM
4.49
Dividend Yield
CLF
N/A
SM
2.43%
5Y Dividends CAGR
CLF
-6.01%
Winner
SM
119.54%
5Y EPS CAGR
CLF
81.08%
SM
N/A
Debt to Equity
CLF
133.34%
Winner
SM
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
CLF
-13.61%
Winner
SM
29.53%

CLF vs SM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
CLF
+32.54%
SM
-1.67%
3M
CLF
+19.17%
Winner
SM
+28.03%
6M
CLF
+4.18%
Winner
SM
+64.33%
1Y
Winner
CLF
+130.25%
SM
+33.79%
5Y(CAGR)
CLF
-7.55%
Winner
SM
+11.01%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CLF
+16.66%
SM
+1.26%
Max(CAGR)
CLF
+6.39%
Winner
SM
+6.89%

CLF vs SM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCLFSM
2026-0.11%+61.89%
2025+39.20%-51.47%
2024-52.45%+1.24%
2023+21.62%+23.24%
2022-25.86%+10.45%
2021+50.97%+363.97%
2020+88.69%-44.67%
2019+10.16%-26.03%
2018-2.66%-33.18%
2017-16.26%-35.30%
2016+403.59%+73.27%
2015-77.52%-48.64%
2014-71.27%-53.20%
2013-30.80%+52.35%
2012-38.56%-31.45%
2011-23.00%+21.34%
2010+63.25%+63.50%
2009+57.60%+56.80%
2008-46.54%-48.20%
2007+112.27%+10.56%
2006+5.86%-4.22%
2005+76.79%+82.35%
2004+95.85%+44.17%
2003+147.09%+11.53%
2002+7.53%+16.86%
2001-14.70%-30.19%
2000-24.00%+185.26%
1999+8.53%-0.33%

CLF vs SM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CLF was -98.78%, occurring on Jan 12, 2016. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for SM was -98.85%, occurring on Apr 1, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current CLF drawdown is -86.11%. The current SM drawdown is -62.11%.

RankCLFSM
#1-98.78%
Jun 30, 2008 - Jan 12, 2016
-98.85%
Nov 26, 2013 - Apr 1, 2020
#2-51.61%
Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 15, 2002
-82.05%
Jun 30, 2008 - Feb 15, 2011
#3-48.31%
Apr 18, 2002 - Oct 13, 2003
-57.19%
Jan 16, 2001 - Apr 12, 2004
#4-41.76%
Mar 4, 2004 - Sep 2, 2004
-51.83%
Oct 27, 2011 - Oct 18, 2013
#5-41.09%
Feb 1, 2006 - Jan 30, 2007
-31.07%
Aug 3, 2011 - Oct 26, 2011
#6-38.96%
Mar 4, 2005 - Sep 28, 2005
-30.27%
Jul 7, 2000 - Sep 6, 2000
#7-32.10%
Jun 1, 2007 - Oct 1, 2007
-29.50%
Apr 21, 2006 - May 2, 2008
#8-27.95%
Oct 12, 2007 - Dec 26, 2007
-24.07%
Nov 9, 1999 - Feb 1, 2000
#9-21.75%
Jan 5, 2004 - Feb 17, 2004
-22.46%
Oct 13, 2000 - Nov 21, 2000
#10-20.24%
Oct 6, 2004 - Nov 11, 2004
-21.62%
Dec 28, 2000 - Jan 16, 2001
#11-18.57%
Dec 28, 2007 - Feb 1, 2008
-19.66%
Apr 5, 2011 - Jul 15, 2011
#12-17.14%
Feb 28, 2008 - Apr 1, 2008
-18.80%
Mar 4, 2005 - Jun 1, 2005
#13-16.03%
Sep 30, 2005 - Nov 9, 2005
-18.52%
Jan 30, 2006 - Apr 18, 2006
#14-12.12%
Jun 5, 2008 - Jun 23, 2008
-16.88%
Oct 3, 2005 - Dec 5, 2005
#15-11.79%
Feb 26, 2007 - Mar 20, 2007
-16.26%
Mar 10, 2000 - Apr 4, 2000

Correlation

Correlation between CLF and SM is 0.59 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.59
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CLF vs SM dividend yield comparison.

YearCLFSM
20260.00%0.72%
20250.00%5.35%
20240.00%1.91%
20230.00%1.55%
20220.00%0.46%
20210.00%0.07%
20200.82%0.33%
20193.10%0.89%
20180.00%0.65%
20170.00%0.45%
20160.00%0.29%
20150.00%0.51%
20148.40%0.26%
20132.29%0.12%
20125.59%0.19%
20111.35%0.14%
20100.65%0.17%
20090.55%0.29%
20081.37%0.49%
20070.50%0.26%
20060.98%0.27%
20050.68%0.27%
20040.19%0.24%
20030.00%0.35%
20020.00%0.40%
20012.19%0.47%
20006.96%0.32%
19991.21%0.20%

Select Stocks to Compare