StockComparison Logo
vs

CLDT vs SPY

Comparison between Chatham Lodging Trust (CLDT, Company) and SPDR S&P 500 ETF Trust (SPY, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceSPY has outperformed CLDT, delivering a return of +13.3% compared to -0.8%

CLDT vs SPY - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap / Net Assets
CLDT
$518M
Winner
SPY
$735B
Expense Ratio
CLDT
N/A
SPY
0.09%
Max Drawdown
CLDT
88.10%
Winner
SPY
56.47%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CLDT
1.78
SPY
1.62
5Y Beta
CLDT
1.02
Winner
SPY
1.00
Industry
CLDT
Reit - Hotel & Motel
SPY
N/A
P/E Ratio
CLDT
59.15
Winner
SPY
28.99
Forward P/E
CLDT
238.10
Winner
SPY
22.37
PEG Ratio
CLDT
2.28
SPY
N/A
Dividend Yield
CLDT
3.27%
SPY
N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR
CLDT
N/A
SPY
5.43%
5Y EPS CAGR
CLDT
N/A
SPY
26.05%
Debt to Equity
CLDT
58.67%
Winner
SPY
32.40%
Free Cash Flow Yield
CLDT
14.12%
SPY
N/A
P/S Ratio
Winner
CLDT
1.85
SPY
3.74
P/B Ratio
Winner
CLDT
0.70
SPY
5.61

CLDT vs SPY - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
CLDT
+28.14%
SPY
+1.90%
3M
Winner
CLDT
+41.16%
SPY
+8.55%
6M
Winner
CLDT
+80.16%
SPY
+8.18%
1Y
Winner
CLDT
+71.99%
SPY
+25.79%
5Y(CAGR)
CLDT
-0.79%
Winner
SPY
+13.32%
10Y(CAGR)
CLDT
-2.68%
Winner
SPY
+15.19%
Max(CAGR)
CLDT
+0.57%
Winner
SPY
+8.47%

CLDT vs SPY - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCLDTSPY
2026+70.22%+8.26%
2025-18.40%+18.00%
2024-15.07%+25.59%
2023-6.26%+26.72%
2022-9.93%-18.64%
2021+31.17%+30.52%
2020-39.44%+17.28%
2019+12.11%+31.09%
2018-17.27%-5.24%
2017+16.73%+20.78%
2016+10.78%+13.59%
2015-27.09%+1.31%
2014+48.71%+14.56%
2013+38.91%+29.00%
2012+46.01%+14.17%
2011-34.76%+0.85%
2010-14.22%+13.14%
2009N/A+22.67%
2008N/A-36.25%
2007N/A+5.32%
2006N/A+13.85%
2005N/A+5.32%
2004N/A+10.75%
2003N/A+24.18%
2002N/A-22.42%
2001N/A-10.13%
2000N/A-8.84%
1999N/A+8.61%

CLDT vs SPY Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CLDT was -83.53%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The maximum drawdown for SPY was -55.20%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 1224 trading sessions.

The current CLDT drawdown is -43.02%. The current SPY drawdown is -2.90%.

RankCLDTSPY
#1-83.53%
Jan 29, 2015 - Mar 18, 2020		-55.20%
Oct 9, 2007 - Aug 16, 2012
#2-52.53%
Apr 16, 2010 - Apr 10, 2013		-47.50%
Mar 24, 2000 - Oct 26, 2006
#3-16.70%
May 21, 2013 - Sep 9, 2013		-33.70%
Feb 19, 2020 - Aug 10, 2020
#4-9.76%
Nov 8, 2013 - Jan 28, 2014		-24.50%
Jan 3, 2022 - Dec 13, 2023
#5-9.73%
Sep 18, 2013 - Nov 4, 2013		-19.34%
Sep 20, 2018 - Apr 12, 2019
#6-7.82%
Jun 13, 2014 - Aug 13, 2014		-18.76%
Feb 19, 2025 - Jun 26, 2025
#7-6.07%
Jan 30, 2014 - Mar 4, 2014		-13.02%
Jul 20, 2015 - Apr 18, 2016
#8-6.06%
Mar 4, 2014 - May 2, 2014		-10.10%
Jan 26, 2018 - Aug 6, 2018
#9-5.23%
Sep 2, 2014 - Sep 26, 2014		-9.44%
Sep 2, 2020 - Nov 11, 2020
#10-3.47%
Nov 3, 2014 - Nov 18, 2014		-9.30%
Jan 19, 2000 - Mar 17, 2000
#11-3.07%
Oct 9, 2014 - Oct 20, 2014		-9.05%
Jul 19, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007
#12-2.94%
May 15, 2013 - May 20, 2013		-8.88%
Jan 27, 2026 - Apr 14, 2026
#13-2.34%
Apr 16, 2013 - Apr 30, 2013		-8.41%
Jul 16, 2024 - Sep 19, 2024
#14-2.28%
Sep 11, 2013 - Sep 18, 2013		-7.35%
Sep 14, 2012 - Jan 2, 2013
#15-1.89%
Dec 26, 2014 - Jan 5, 2015		-7.27%
Sep 18, 2014 - Oct 31, 2014

Correlation

Correlation between CLDT and SPY is -0.30 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.

-0.30
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CLDT vs SPY dividend yield comparison.

YearCLDTSPY
20260.87%0.24%
20255.29%1.07%
20243.13%1.21%
20232.61%1.40%
20220.57%1.65%
20210.00%1.20%
20202.04%1.52%
20197.20%1.75%
20187.47%2.04%
20175.80%1.80%
20166.72%2.03%
20155.86%2.06%
20143.21%1.87%
20134.11%1.81%
20125.04%2.18%
20116.49%2.05%
20102.03%1.80%
20090.00%1.95%
20080.00%3.02%
20070.00%1.85%
20060.00%1.73%
20050.00%1.73%
20040.00%1.82%
20030.00%1.47%
20020.00%1.70%
20010.00%1.25%
20000.00%1.15%
19990.00%0.24%

Select Stocks to Compare

Popular: CLDT vs SPY