StockComparison Logo
vs

CL vs CTAS

Comparison between Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL, Company) and Cintas Corporation (CTAS, Company).

CL is from the Consumer Defensive sector, while CTAS is from the Industrials sector.

5-Year PerformanceCTAS has outperformed CL, delivering a return of +15.9% compared to +3.8%

CL vs CTAS - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CL
$72B
CTAS
$72B
Max Drawdown
Winner
CL
34.23%
CTAS
67.75%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CL
-0.07
CTAS
-1.03
5Y Beta
Winner
CL
0.02
CTAS
0.60
Industry
CL
Household & Personal Products
CTAS
Specialty Business Services
P/E Ratio
Winner
CL
25.83
CTAS
37.38
Forward P/E
Winner
CL
22.99
CTAS
33.33
PEG Ratio
CL
798.41
Winner
CTAS
3.89
Dividend Yield
Winner
CL
2.31%
CTAS
0.97%
5Y Dividends CAGR
CL
3.38%
Winner
CTAS
11.82%
5Y EPS CAGR
CL
5.50%
Winner
CTAS
15.38%
Debt to Equity
CL
5473.79%
Winner
CTAS
55.48%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
CL
6.02%
CTAS
2.48%
P/S Ratio
Winner
CL
3.38
CTAS
6.53
P/B Ratio
CL
488.83
Winner
CTAS
15.03

CL vs CTAS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CL
+2.25%
Winner
CTAS
+6.85%
3M
Winner
CL
+2.31%
CTAS
-8.54%
6M
Winner
CL
+15.56%
CTAS
-5.53%
1Y
Winner
CL
-1.58%
CTAS
-20.40%
5Y(CAGR)
CL
+3.77%
Winner
CTAS
+15.91%
10Y(CAGR)
CL
+4.67%
Winner
CTAS
+23.62%
Max(CAGR)
CL
+6.33%
Winner
CTAS
+12.65%

CL vs CTAS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCLCTAS
2026+16.53%-4.17%
2025-10.65%+4.13%
2024+15.10%+24.46%
2023+3.31%+35.60%
2022-4.60%+7.60%
2021+3.50%+30.13%
2020+28.50%+31.88%
2019+19.15%+62.22%
2018-18.85%+8.31%
2017+17.71%+35.46%
2016+3.40%+32.58%
2015-1.35%+17.39%
2014+9.94%+36.02%
2013+25.47%+43.96%
2012+17.62%+17.86%
2011+18.91%+26.66%
2010-0.53%+9.94%
2009+21.54%+11.53%
2008-9.37%-27.16%
2007+21.12%-16.06%
2006+21.38%-3.44%
2005+12.05%-4.02%
2004+5.04%-11.61%
2003-5.45%+7.44%
2002-7.80%-5.38%
2001-6.47%-4.28%
2000+4.85%+53.86%
1999+5.16%-12.73%

CL vs CTAS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CL was -34.06%, occurring on Mar 10, 2000. Recovery took 250 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CTAS was -65.30%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2829 trading sessions.

The current CL drawdown is -14.36%. The current CTAS drawdown is -21.83%.

RankCLCTAS
#1-34.06%
Dec 31, 1999 - Dec 27, 2000
-65.30%
May 14, 2002 - Aug 8, 2013
#2-31.06%
Sep 12, 2008 - Oct 6, 2009
-48.38%
Feb 19, 2020 - Jul 29, 2020
#3-30.00%
Dec 27, 2000 - Apr 26, 2006
-39.89%
Nov 1, 1999 - Apr 4, 2000
#4-29.07%
Sep 4, 2024 - Nov 3, 2025
-36.22%
Dec 26, 2000 - May 7, 2002
#5-23.76%
Jan 22, 2018 - Jul 29, 2019
-27.67%
Jun 6, 2025 - May 13, 2026
#6-22.57%
Feb 10, 2020 - Jul 30, 2020
-27.09%
Sep 6, 2018 - Apr 24, 2019
#7-18.36%
Dec 31, 2021 - Jan 23, 2024
-23.85%
Dec 10, 2021 - Nov 22, 2022
#8-14.92%
Jan 9, 2008 - Sep 12, 2008
-23.77%
Jun 2, 2000 - Nov 7, 2000
#9-14.57%
Mar 5, 2015 - Mar 17, 2016
-19.60%
Nov 26, 2024 - May 27, 2025
#10-13.66%
Sep 6, 2016 - Feb 23, 2017
-16.42%
Apr 4, 2000 - Apr 25, 2000
#11-13.22%
Dec 1, 2020 - Dec 28, 2021
-13.75%
Dec 1, 2015 - May 24, 2016
#12-12.99%
Dec 2, 2009 - Apr 29, 2011
-13.73%
Nov 27, 2000 - Dec 26, 2000
#13-12.89%
Jul 29, 2019 - Feb 3, 2020
-13.71%
Nov 16, 2020 - Jun 22, 2021
#14-11.92%
Nov 1, 1999 - Dec 22, 1999
-12.80%
Sep 6, 2016 - Dec 5, 2016
#15-10.44%
May 16, 2013 - Oct 16, 2013
-12.41%
May 16, 2000 - May 30, 2000

Correlation

Correlation between CL and CTAS is 0.85 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.85
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

CL vs CTAS dividend yield comparison.

YearCLCTAS
20261.17%0.51%
20252.61%0.89%
20242.18%0.80%
20232.40%0.83%
20222.36%0.93%
20212.10%0.77%
20202.05%0.99%
20192.48%0.95%
20182.79%1.22%
20172.11%1.04%
20162.37%1.15%
20152.25%1.15%
20142.05%2.17%
20132.04%1.29%
20122.33%1.56%
20112.46%1.55%
20102.53%3.47%
20092.09%1.80%
20082.28%1.98%
20071.80%1.16%
20061.92%0.88%
20052.02%0.78%
20041.88%0.66%
20031.80%0.54%
20021.37%0.55%
20011.17%0.46%
20000.98%0.35%

Select Stocks to Compare