StockComparison Logo
vs

CL vs BAM

Comparison between Colgate-Palmolive Company (CL, Company) and Brookfield Asset Management Ltd - Class A (BAM, Company).

CL is from the Consumer Defensive sector, while BAM is from the Financial Services sector.

CL vs BAM - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CL
$75B
BAM
$74B
Max Drawdown
CL
34.23%
Winner
BAM
32.16%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CL
-0.00
BAM
-0.46
5Y Beta
Winner
CL
0.00
BAM
1.27
Industry
CL
Household & Personal Products
BAM
Asset Management
P/E Ratio
Winner
CL
26.72
BAM
29.27
Forward P/E
Winner
CL
24.63
BAM
24.88
PEG Ratio
CL
825.75
Winner
BAM
1.21
Dividend Yield
CL
2.19%
Winner
BAM
3.90%
5Y Dividends CAGR
CL
3.38%
BAM
N/A
5Y EPS CAGR
CL
5.50%
Winner
BAM
34.24%
Debt to Equity
CL
5473.79%
Winner
BAM
71.22%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
CL
5.82%
BAM
3.13%
P/S Ratio
Winner
CL
3.66
BAM
14.32
P/B Ratio
CL
524.98
Winner
BAM
9.65

CL vs BAM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
CL
+3.64%
BAM
-2.12%
3M
Winner
CL
+6.44%
BAM
+3.39%
6M
Winner
CL
+13.08%
BAM
-12.63%
1Y
Winner
CL
+1.88%
BAM
-14.33%
5Y(CAGR)
CL
+4.44%
BAM
N/A
10Y(CAGR)
CL
+4.48%
BAM
N/A
Max(CAGR)
CL
+6.38%
Winner
BAM
+14.60%

CL vs BAM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCLBAM
2026+18.60%-11.83%
2025-10.65%-0.56%
2024+15.10%+44.51%
2023+3.31%+46.61%
2022-4.60%-10.41%
2021+3.50%N/A
2020+28.50%N/A
2019+19.15%N/A
2018-18.85%N/A
2017+17.71%N/A
2016+3.40%N/A
2015-1.35%N/A
2014+9.94%N/A
2013+25.47%N/A
2012+17.62%N/A
2011+18.91%N/A
2010-0.53%N/A
2009+21.54%N/A
2008-9.37%N/A
2007+21.12%N/A
2006+21.38%N/A
2005+12.05%N/A
2004+5.04%N/A
2003-5.45%N/A
2002-7.80%N/A
2001-6.47%N/A
2000+4.85%N/A
1999+5.16%N/A

CL vs BAM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CL was -34.06%, occurring on Mar 10, 2000. Recovery took 250 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for BAM was -30.36%, occurring on Mar 24, 2026. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current CL drawdown is -12.83%. The current BAM drawdown is -24.25%.

RankCLBAM
#1-34.06%
Dec 31, 1999 - Dec 27, 2000		-30.36%
Jul 24, 2025 - Mar 24, 2026
#2-31.06%
Sep 12, 2008 - Oct 6, 2009		-29.54%
Jan 29, 2025 - Jul 17, 2025
#3-30.00%
Dec 27, 2000 - Apr 26, 2006		-20.47%
Sep 15, 2023 - Dec 1, 2023
#4-29.07%
Sep 4, 2024 - Nov 3, 2025		-17.87%
Dec 2, 2022 - Feb 2, 2023
#5-23.76%
Jan 22, 2018 - Jul 29, 2019		-13.12%
Feb 15, 2023 - Aug 11, 2023
#6-22.57%
Feb 10, 2020 - Jul 30, 2020		-12.04%
Dec 11, 2024 - Jan 24, 2025
#7-18.36%
Dec 31, 2021 - Jan 23, 2024		-11.72%
Mar 21, 2024 - Jul 22, 2024
#8-14.92%
Jan 9, 2008 - Sep 12, 2008		-11.57%
Jul 31, 2024 - Sep 11, 2024
#9-14.57%
Mar 5, 2015 - Mar 17, 2016		-8.01%
Aug 14, 2023 - Sep 11, 2023
#10-13.66%
Sep 6, 2016 - Feb 23, 2017		-6.41%
Dec 27, 2023 - Jan 26, 2024
#11-13.22%
Dec 1, 2020 - Dec 28, 2021		-4.84%
Nov 11, 2024 - Nov 26, 2024
#12-12.99%
Dec 2, 2009 - Apr 29, 2011		-4.61%
Mar 7, 2024 - Mar 21, 2024
#13-12.89%
Jul 29, 2019 - Feb 3, 2020		-4.58%
Jan 29, 2024 - Feb 15, 2024
#14-11.92%
Nov 1, 1999 - Dec 22, 1999		-2.84%
Jul 22, 2024 - Jul 30, 2024
#15-10.44%
May 16, 2013 - Oct 16, 2013		-2.50%
Dec 1, 2023 - Dec 12, 2023

Correlation

Correlation between CL and BAM is 0.56 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.56
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

CL vs BAM dividend yield comparison.

YearCLBAM
20261.15%2.18%
20252.61%3.34%
20242.18%2.80%
20232.40%3.19%
20222.36%0.00%
20212.10%0.00%
20202.05%0.00%
20192.48%0.00%
20182.79%0.00%
20172.11%0.00%
20162.37%0.00%
20152.25%0.00%
20142.05%0.00%
20132.04%0.00%
20122.33%0.00%
20112.46%0.00%
20102.53%0.00%
20092.09%0.00%
20082.28%0.00%
20071.80%0.00%
20061.92%0.00%
20052.02%0.00%
20041.88%0.00%
20031.80%0.00%
20021.37%0.00%
20011.17%0.00%
20000.98%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare

Popular: CL vs SPYBAM vs SPY