StockComparison Logo
vs

CIVB vs ETD

Comparison between Civista Bancshares Inc (CIVB, Company) and Ethan Allen Interiors Inc (ETD, Company).

CIVB is from the Financial Services sector, while ETD is from the Consumer Cyclical sector.

5-Year PerformanceCIVB has outperformed ETD, delivering a return of +7.9% compared to +4.8%

CIVB vs ETD - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CIVB
$583M
ETD
$581M
Max Drawdown
CIVB
90.89%
Winner
ETD
84.68%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CIVB
1.23
ETD
-0.70
5Y Beta
Winner
CIVB
0.64
ETD
0.80
Industry
CIVB
Banks - Regional
ETD
Furnishings, Fixtures & Appliances
P/E Ratio
Winner
CIVB
10.13
ETD
14.39
Forward P/E
Winner
CIVB
9.53
ETD
10.50
PEG Ratio
Winner
CIVB
0.32
ETD
1.99
Dividend Yield
CIVB
2.42%
Winner
ETD
6.83%
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
CIVB
8.76%
ETD
5.17%
5Y EPS CAGR
Winner
CIVB
18.98%
ETD
6.08%
Debt to Equity
CIVB
0.00%
ETD
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
CIVB
8.66%
ETD
7.69%
P/S Ratio
CIVB
3.34
Winner
ETD
0.98
P/B Ratio
Winner
CIVB
1.07
ETD
1.23

CIVB vs ETD - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CIVB
+3.17%
Winner
ETD
+3.92%
3M
Winner
CIVB
+16.16%
ETD
+2.22%
6M
Winner
CIVB
+25.25%
ETD
-3.51%
1Y
Winner
CIVB
+36.40%
ETD
-19.22%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CIVB
+7.87%
ETD
+4.77%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CIVB
+9.77%
ETD
+1.44%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CIVB
+4.50%
ETD
+1.95%

CIVB vs ETD - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCIVBETD
2026+31.20%+2.18%
2025+12.54%-12.45%
2024+19.02%-5.25%
2023-11.16%+28.78%
2022-8.50%+6.82%
2021+41.05%+43.20%
2020-25.07%+14.00%
2019+43.00%+16.91%
2018-19.48%-35.99%
2017+15.14%-21.35%
2016+66.47%+39.59%
2015+28.12%-7.75%
2014+59.93%+4.79%
2013+23.96%+14.53%
2012+32.89%+8.46%
2011+1.56%+15.40%
2010-14.41%+47.76%
2009-23.15%-4.93%
2008-53.83%-46.89%
2007-24.22%-19.19%
2006+6.60%-1.36%
2005-14.43%-5.38%
2004-16.04%+6.65%
2003+22.69%+18.13%
2002+13.73%-15.03%
2001+14.08%+35.34%
2000N/A+11.63%
1999N/A-8.08%

CIVB vs ETD Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CIVB was -87.15%, occurring on Oct 7, 2011. Recovery took 3458 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for ETD was -82.92%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 2675 trading sessions.

The current CIVB drawdown is -2.65%. The current ETD drawdown is -23.99%.

RankCIVBETD
#1-87.15%
Apr 28, 2003 - Feb 3, 2017
-82.92%
Apr 26, 2006 - Dec 8, 2016
#2-53.27%
Jun 6, 2018 - Jun 7, 2021
-73.68%
Dec 20, 2016 - Apr 28, 2021
#3-42.06%
Nov 23, 2021 - May 2, 2025
-41.16%
Nov 16, 1999 - Jan 31, 2001
#4-24.00%
Oct 12, 2001 - Aug 22, 2002
-36.92%
Mar 28, 2024 - May 13, 2026
#5-22.85%
Jul 3, 2025 - Feb 4, 2026
-35.40%
Jan 4, 2002 - Jan 14, 2004
#6-21.11%
Jan 31, 2001 - Jul 9, 2001
-31.16%
Nov 12, 2004 - Jan 26, 2006
#7-16.43%
Feb 14, 2017 - Oct 10, 2017
-31.15%
Feb 2, 2001 - Nov 14, 2001
#8-11.49%
Feb 5, 2026 - Apr 24, 2026
-30.59%
May 10, 2021 - Nov 8, 2022
#9-11.33%
Nov 29, 2017 - Mar 6, 2018
-26.54%
Aug 3, 2023 - Mar 27, 2024
#10-11.27%
Oct 10, 2017 - Nov 29, 2017
-20.97%
Mar 5, 2004 - Nov 12, 2004
#11-9.89%
Jun 7, 2021 - Aug 11, 2021
-15.96%
Feb 3, 2023 - Jul 18, 2023
#12-8.45%
Aug 27, 2001 - Oct 9, 2001
-12.89%
Nov 15, 2022 - Jan 12, 2023
#13-8.42%
May 15, 2025 - Jul 2, 2025
-10.53%
Jan 12, 2023 - Feb 2, 2023
#14-7.97%
Mar 7, 2018 - May 22, 2018
-8.83%
Apr 28, 2021 - May 7, 2021
#15-7.21%
Aug 11, 2021 - Oct 5, 2021
-8.19%
Jan 31, 2006 - Mar 27, 2006

Correlation

Correlation between CIVB and ETD is 0.64 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.64
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

CIVB vs ETD dividend yield comparison.

YearCIVBETD
20261.27%3.47%
20253.06%7.92%
20243.04%6.87%
20233.31%5.95%
20222.54%6.62%
20212.13%10.61%
20202.51%3.12%
20191.75%9.34%
20181.84%6.08%
20171.14%2.66%
20161.13%1.76%
20151.56%1.87%
20141.85%1.36%
20132.30%1.22%
20122.29%1.24%
20110.74%1.01%
20100.00%1.00%
20095.38%3.35%
200815.19%6.33%
20077.97%2.88%
20065.69%2.05%
20055.74%1.72%
20044.63%8.62%
20033.67%0.69%
20025.48%0.58%
20014.66%0.38%
20000.00%0.48%

Select Stocks to Compare