CI vs AMT
Comparison between Cigna Group (The) (CI, Company) and American Tower Corp (AMT, Company).
CI is from the Healthcare sector, while AMT is from the Real Estate sector.
5-Year PerformanceCI has outperformed AMT, delivering a return of +6.4% compared to -7.1%
CI vs AMT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CI vs AMT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CI vs AMT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CI | AMT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +5.67% | -3.74% |
| 2025 | +2.32% | +0.36% |
| 2024 | -9.48% | -13.33% |
| 2023 | -5.14% | +3.98% |
| 2022 | +43.83% | -24.04% |
| 2021 | +13.61% | +35.83% |
| 2020 | +1.60% | +0.10% |
| 2019 | +9.28% | +49.22% |
| 2018 | -6.22% | +14.56% |
| 2017 | +49.68% | +37.08% |
| 2016 | -8.95% | +11.50% |
| 2015 | +42.35% | -0.83% |
| 2014 | +19.45% | +26.35% |
| 2013 | +58.70% | +2.43% |
| 2012 | +23.78% | +33.09% |
| 2011 | +11.15% | +16.93% |
| 2010 | +0.92% | +18.82% |
| 2009 | +98.84% | +43.13% |
| 2008 | -68.86% | -28.90% |
| 2007 | +22.40% | +12.11% |
| 2006 | +17.26% | +36.56% |
| 2005 | +39.76% | +49.23% |
| 2004 | +43.22% | +67.73% |
| 2003 | +38.99% | +181.04% |
| 2002 | -54.53% | -64.66% |
| 2001 | -26.87% | -73.88% |
| 2000 | +71.09% | +29.24% |
| 1999 | +10.23% | +61.35% |
CI vs AMT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CI was -84.34%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 1265 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for AMT was -98.70%, occurring on Oct 9, 2002. Recovery took 2747 trading sessions.
The current CI drawdown is -17.60%. The current AMT drawdown is -36.43%.
| Rank | CI | AMT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -84.34% Jan 9, 2008 - Jan 17, 2013 | -98.70% Mar 10, 2000 - Feb 10, 2011 |
| #2 | -72.61% Dec 28, 2000 - Mar 10, 2006 | -45.32% Sep 8, 2021 - Oct 4, 2023 |
| #3 | -42.47% Jan 26, 2018 - Jan 20, 2021 | -30.29% Feb 13, 2020 - Apr 9, 2020 |
| #4 | -33.42% Mar 30, 2006 - Feb 1, 2007 | -26.02% Jul 29, 2020 - Jun 7, 2021 |
| #5 | -32.11% Sep 16, 2024 - Oct 31, 2025 | -19.19% Nov 2, 2015 - Apr 1, 2016 |
| #6 | -31.64% Jun 25, 2015 - Jun 19, 2017 | -18.95% May 21, 2013 - Feb 19, 2014 |
| #7 | -28.63% Nov 17, 1999 - May 18, 2000 | -18.30% Feb 11, 2011 - Oct 24, 2011 |
| #8 | -28.18% Dec 12, 2022 - Feb 9, 2024 | -16.81% Jan 21, 2000 - Feb 10, 2000 |
| #9 | -27.48% May 10, 2021 - Apr 20, 2022 | -15.63% Nov 28, 2014 - Nov 2, 2015 |
| #10 | -19.91% May 29, 2007 - Jan 9, 2008 | -14.31% Sep 4, 2019 - Feb 10, 2020 |
| #11 | -16.06% Aug 11, 2000 - Oct 2, 2000 | -14.00% Jul 22, 2016 - Mar 21, 2017 |
| #12 | -16.03% Jan 21, 2014 - May 29, 2014 | -12.48% Nov 8, 2017 - Aug 3, 2018 |
| #13 | -13.17% Sep 16, 2013 - Nov 19, 2013 | -11.73% Apr 9, 2020 - Jun 1, 2020 |
| #14 | -11.98% Apr 1, 2024 - Sep 3, 2024 | -10.87% Feb 16, 2000 - Feb 29, 2000 |
| #15 | -11.01% Jan 20, 2021 - Mar 5, 2021 | -9.20% Dec 20, 1999 - Jan 10, 2000 |
Correlation
Correlation between CI and AMT is 0.92 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CI vs AMT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CI | AMT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.07% | 2.17% |
| 2025 | 2.19% | 3.87% |
| 2024 | 2.03% | 3.53% |
| 2023 | 1.64% | 2.99% |
| 2022 | 1.35% | 2.77% |
| 2021 | 1.74% | 1.78% |
| 2020 | 0.02% | 2.02% |
| 2019 | 0.02% | 1.64% |
| 2018 | 0.02% | 1.99% |
| 2017 | 0.02% | 1.84% |
| 2016 | 0.03% | 2.05% |
| 2015 | 0.03% | 1.87% |
| 2014 | 0.04% | 1.42% |
| 2013 | 0.05% | 1.38% |
| 2012 | 0.07% | 1.16% |
| 2011 | 0.10% | 0.58% |
| 2010 | 0.11% | 0.00% |
| 2009 | 0.11% | 0.00% |
| 2008 | 0.24% | 0.00% |
| 2007 | 0.07% | 0.00% |
| 2006 | 0.08% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 0.09% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 0.50% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 2.30% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 3.21% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 1.38% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 0.94% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 0.37% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks