CI vs EMR
Comparison between Cigna Group (The) (CI, Company) and Emerson Electric Company (EMR, Company).
CI is from the Healthcare sector, while EMR is from the Industrials sector.
5-Year PerformanceEMR has outperformed CI, delivering a return of +9.8% compared to +3.3%
CI vs EMR - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CI vs EMR - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CI vs EMR - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CI | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +1.62% | +0.09% |
| 2025 | +2.32% | +10.49% |
| 2024 | -9.48% | +31.71% |
| 2023 | -5.14% | +3.71% |
| 2022 | +43.83% | +7.14% |
| 2021 | +13.61% | +21.75% |
| 2020 | +1.60% | +6.89% |
| 2019 | +9.28% | +31.56% |
| 2018 | -6.22% | -13.21% |
| 2017 | +49.68% | +26.32% |
| 2016 | -8.95% | +22.36% |
| 2015 | +42.35% | -19.81% |
| 2014 | +19.45% | -8.48% |
| 2013 | +58.70% | +32.05% |
| 2012 | +23.78% | +14.62% |
| 2011 | +11.15% | -16.31% |
| 2010 | +0.92% | +35.49% |
| 2009 | +98.84% | +16.48% |
| 2008 | -68.86% | -31.79% |
| 2007 | +22.40% | +32.11% |
| 2006 | +17.26% | +19.98% |
| 2005 | +39.76% | +11.45% |
| 2004 | +43.22% | +10.97% |
| 2003 | +38.99% | +27.23% |
| 2002 | -54.53% | -8.07% |
| 2001 | -26.87% | -23.25% |
| 2000 | +71.09% | +40.28% |
| 1999 | +10.23% | -2.04% |
CI vs EMR Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CI was -84.34%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 1265 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for EMR was -56.11%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 600 trading sessions.
The current CI drawdown is -20.77%. The current EMR drawdown is -15.93%.
| Rank | CI | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -84.34% Jan 9, 2008 - Jan 17, 2013 | -56.11% Jun 5, 2008 - Oct 21, 2010 |
| #2 | -72.61% Dec 28, 2000 - Mar 10, 2006 | -50.76% Jan 16, 2020 - Nov 9, 2020 |
| #3 | -42.47% Jan 26, 2018 - Jan 20, 2021 | -43.61% Dec 8, 2000 - Sep 23, 2005 |
| #4 | -33.42% Mar 30, 2006 - Feb 1, 2007 | -35.94% Dec 30, 2013 - Feb 13, 2017 |
| #5 | -32.11% Sep 16, 2024 - Oct 31, 2025 | -33.44% Jan 7, 2000 - Jun 2, 2000 |
| #6 | -31.64% Jun 25, 2015 - Jun 19, 2017 | -33.25% Feb 14, 2011 - Feb 14, 2013 |
| #7 | -28.63% Nov 17, 1999 - May 18, 2000 | -29.61% Dec 4, 2024 - Jun 30, 2025 |
| #8 | -28.18% Dec 12, 2022 - Feb 9, 2024 | -29.30% Sep 2, 2021 - Feb 7, 2024 |
| #9 | -27.48% May 10, 2021 - Apr 20, 2022 | -28.83% Oct 3, 2018 - Dec 11, 2019 |
| #10 | -19.91% May 29, 2007 - Jan 9, 2008 | -23.46% Feb 10, 2026 - Mar 30, 2026 |
| #11 | -16.06% Aug 11, 2000 - Oct 2, 2000 | -17.90% Dec 7, 2007 - May 19, 2008 |
| #12 | -16.03% Jan 21, 2014 - May 29, 2014 | -16.98% Jul 16, 2024 - Nov 6, 2024 |
| #13 | -13.17% Sep 16, 2013 - Nov 19, 2013 | -16.62% Jul 25, 2025 - Jan 16, 2026 |
| #14 | -11.98% Apr 1, 2024 - Sep 3, 2024 | -16.53% Aug 14, 2000 - Oct 31, 2000 |
| #15 | -11.01% Jan 20, 2021 - Mar 5, 2021 | -12.49% May 5, 2006 - Nov 7, 2006 |
Correlation
Correlation between CI and EMR is 0.93 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
CI vs EMR dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CI | EMR |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.55% | 0.82% |
| 2025 | 2.19% | 1.61% |
| 2024 | 2.03% | 1.70% |
| 2023 | 1.64% | 2.14% |
| 2022 | 1.35% | 2.15% |
| 2021 | 1.74% | 2.18% |
| 2020 | 0.02% | 2.49% |
| 2019 | 0.02% | 2.58% |
| 2018 | 0.02% | 3.26% |
| 2017 | 0.02% | 2.76% |
| 2016 | 0.03% | 3.42% |
| 2015 | 0.03% | 3.94% |
| 2014 | 0.04% | 2.85% |
| 2013 | 0.05% | 2.37% |
| 2012 | 0.07% | 3.04% |
| 2011 | 0.10% | 3.08% |
| 2010 | 0.11% | 2.36% |
| 2009 | 0.11% | 3.11% |
| 2008 | 0.24% | 3.36% |
| 2007 | 0.07% | 1.92% |
| 2006 | 0.08% | 2.11% |
| 2005 | 0.09% | 2.26% |
| 2004 | 0.50% | 2.30% |
| 2003 | 2.30% | 2.44% |
| 2002 | 3.21% | 3.06% |
| 2001 | 1.38% | 2.69% |
| 2000 | 0.94% | 1.85% |
| 1999 | 0.37% | 0.62% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks