StockComparison Logo
vs

CHT vs BAP

Comparison between Chunghwa Telecom (CHT, Company) and Credicorp Ltd (BAP, Company).

CHT is from the Communication Services sector, while BAP is from the Financial Services sector.

5-Year PerformanceBAP has outperformed CHT, delivering a return of +33.5% compared to +5.4%

CHT vs BAP - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CHT
$32B
BAP
$31B
Max Drawdown
Winner
CHT
48.20%
BAP
64.93%
Sharpe Ratio
CHT
-0.23
Winner
BAP
1.74
5Y Beta
Winner
CHT
0.19
BAP
0.66
Industry
CHT
Telecom Services
BAP
Banks - Regional
P/E Ratio
CHT
26.46
Winner
BAP
15.12
Forward P/E
CHT
26.53
Winner
BAP
12.64
PEG Ratio
CHT
5.95
Winner
BAP
0.44
Dividend Yield
Winner
CHT
3.86%
BAP
3.68%
5Y EPS CAGR
CHT
0.68%
Winner
BAP
42.63%
Debt to Equity
Winner
CHT
10.03%
BAP
80.93%
Free Cash Flow Yield
CHT
5.08%
Winner
BAP
6.02%
P/S Ratio
Winner
CHT
0.14
BAP
1.43
P/B Ratio
Winner
CHT
2.69
BAP
2.70

CHT vs BAP - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CHT
-0.06%
Winner
BAP
+3.24%
3M
CHT
+3.33%
Winner
BAP
+25.73%
6M
CHT
+3.38%
Winner
BAP
+18.18%
1Y
CHT
+0.73%
Winner
BAP
+71.62%
5Y(CAGR)
CHT
+5.41%
Winner
BAP
+33.50%
10Y(CAGR)
CHT
+5.67%
Winner
BAP
+13.98%
Max(CAGR)
CHT
+10.29%
Winner
BAP
+18.02%

CHT vs BAP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCHTBAP
2026+6.57%+42.08%
2025+15.49%+64.72%
2024+0.63%+32.49%
2023+9.01%+14.25%
2022-9.52%+12.39%
2021+12.87%-21.66%
2020+8.87%-20.35%
2019+9.33%-2.35%
2018+3.67%+5.74%
2017+15.98%+34.80%
2016+10.57%+69.45%
2015+6.34%-38.03%
2014-0.47%+24.00%
2013+0.10%-9.54%
2012+7.65%+36.81%
2011+38.86%-6.73%
2010+43.01%+56.14%
2009+34.35%+56.69%
2008-14.41%-32.22%
2007+2.08%+87.36%
2006+11.40%+75.55%
2005-6.57%+51.20%
2004+59.36%+21.81%
2003-2.62%+44.34%
2002N/A+10.25%
2001N/A+51.09%
2000N/A-48.50%
1999N/A+12.89%

CHT vs BAP Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CHT was -44.43%, occurring on Oct 24, 2008. Recovery took 595 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for BAP was -64.93%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 440 trading sessions.

The current CHT drawdown is -3.86%. The current BAP drawdown is -3.03%.

RankCHTBAP
#1-44.43%
Mar 24, 2008 - Aug 2, 2010
-64.93%
Jun 16, 2008 - Mar 16, 2010
#2-25.11%
May 8, 2006 - Feb 20, 2008
-59.33%
Mar 18, 2019 - Nov 18, 2024
#3-23.72%
Feb 23, 2022 - Sep 26, 2024
-56.49%
Jan 14, 2000 - Nov 25, 2003
#4-19.37%
Aug 3, 2005 - May 2, 2006
-48.00%
Dec 3, 2014 - Jan 10, 2017
#5-18.37%
Jul 20, 2011 - Jul 11, 2013
-34.18%
Nov 8, 2010 - Mar 1, 2012
#6-16.10%
Aug 11, 2016 - Jan 2, 2018
-30.50%
Mar 28, 2013 - Nov 4, 2014
#7-12.38%
Apr 19, 2004 - Jul 9, 2004
-24.06%
Oct 4, 2005 - Feb 27, 2006
#8-12.26%
Oct 30, 2003 - Jan 28, 2004
-20.00%
Jan 7, 2004 - Oct 6, 2004
#9-11.57%
Feb 25, 2005 - Aug 3, 2005
-16.75%
Feb 20, 2007 - Apr 17, 2007
#10-11.03%
Aug 19, 2025 - Jun 11, 2026
-16.29%
Apr 5, 2012 - Nov 9, 2012
#11-10.59%
Jul 22, 2013 - Aug 22, 2014
-15.71%
Feb 3, 2026 - Jun 11, 2026
#12-9.47%
Apr 10, 2018 - Oct 4, 2019
-15.41%
Nov 8, 2006 - Feb 9, 2007
#13-9.39%
Sep 26, 2024 - May 2, 2025
-15.08%
Jul 23, 2007 - Sep 27, 2007
#14-8.68%
Mar 18, 2004 - Apr 5, 2004
-14.90%
Feb 27, 2006 - May 9, 2006
#15-7.76%
Aug 28, 2014 - Feb 27, 2015
-14.48%
Nov 21, 2024 - Apr 28, 2025

Correlation

Correlation between CHT and BAP is 0.85 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.85
-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

CHT vs BAP dividend yield comparison.

YearCHTBAP
20263.86%3.67%
20254.00%3.78%
20243.91%6.65%
20233.91%4.52%
20224.35%2.84%
20213.67%0.99%
20203.67%5.37%
20193.91%3.95%
20184.44%1.94%
20173.64%4.16%
20164.32%1.47%
20153.88%2.25%
20144.51%1.19%
20134.68%1.96%
20128.89%1.57%
20115.74%1.78%
20104.97%1.43%
20094.89%1.95%
20086.49%3.00%
20075.78%1.70%
20065.32%2.69%
20056.34%3.51%
200410.10%2.53%
20030.00%2.25%
20020.00%2.13%
20010.00%3.43%
20000.00%1.67%

Select Stocks to Compare