CCZ vs TM
Comparison between Comcast Corp (CCZ, Company) and Toyota Motor Corporation (TM, Company).
5-Year PerformanceCCZ has outperformed TM, delivering a return of +4.0% compared to +2.6%
CCZ vs TM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
CCZ vs TM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
CCZ vs TM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | CCZ | TM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +10.69% | -17.23% |
| 2025 | +1.18% | +14.71% |
| 2024 | +10.59% | +10.10% |
| 2023 | +3.78% | +36.47% |
| 2022 | -8.28% | -24.81% |
| 2021 | +7.62% | +24.20% |
| 2020 | +8.24% | +12.26% |
| 2019 | +19.46% | +22.49% |
| 2018 | -11.89% | -6.75% |
| 2017 | +43.63% | +10.83% |
| 2016 | +9.71% | -0.23% |
| 2015 | -13.76% | +3.20% |
| 2014 | +33.47% | +7.00% |
| 2013 | -0.20% | +29.82% |
| 2012 | +21.07% | +40.05% |
| 2011 | +21.60% | -15.35% |
| 2010 | +8.65% | -6.33% |
| 2009 | +13.74% | +28.90% |
| 2008 | -5.02% | -36.78% |
| 2007 | +9.27% | -20.02% |
| 2006 | +7.57% | +28.83% |
| 2005 | -6.32% | +30.52% |
| 2004 | +34.63% | +20.14% |
| 2003 | +50.55% | +29.25% |
| 2002 | -50.75% | +4.74% |
| 2001 | +24.93% | -18.72% |
| 2000 | -54.94% | -34.77% |
| 1999 | +12.22% | +42.68% |
CCZ vs TM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for CCZ was -86.36%, occurring on Aug 6, 2002. Recovery took 3633 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for TM was -60.16%, occurring on Apr 14, 2003. Recovery took 1423 trading sessions.
The current CCZ drawdown is -1.50%. The current TM drawdown is -27.37%.
| Rank | CCZ | TM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -86.36% Mar 31, 2000 - Sep 11, 2014 | -60.16% Apr 25, 2000 - Dec 21, 2005 |
| #2 | -24.77% Jan 27, 2021 - Nov 13, 2025 | -56.11% Jan 4, 2007 - May 13, 2013 |
| #3 | -23.96% Sep 14, 2016 - Mar 31, 2017 | -36.79% Jan 13, 2022 - Jan 19, 2024 |
| #4 | -23.63% Dec 29, 2017 - Dec 20, 2019 | -34.92% Mar 27, 2024 - Feb 4, 2026 |
| #5 | -20.28% Sep 18, 2014 - Mar 29, 2016 | -32.94% Feb 13, 2026 - Jun 25, 2026 |
| #6 | -19.56% Dec 15, 1999 - Mar 7, 2000 | -27.92% Mar 30, 2015 - Jan 3, 2018 |
| #7 | -18.51% Apr 5, 2016 - Sep 13, 2016 | -25.20% Nov 11, 2019 - Nov 11, 2020 |
| #8 | -17.92% Mar 11, 2020 - Jul 23, 2020 | -22.65% May 5, 2006 - Nov 8, 2006 |
| #9 | -16.51% Mar 31, 2017 - Aug 29, 2017 | -20.90% Aug 2, 2013 - Jan 22, 2015 |
| #10 | -15.15% Sep 8, 2017 - Dec 22, 2017 | -18.07% May 10, 2018 - Sep 13, 2019 |
| #11 | -15.13% Dec 20, 2019 - Mar 11, 2020 | -17.21% Dec 31, 1999 - Mar 27, 2000 |
| #12 | -12.07% Dec 16, 2020 - Jan 26, 2021 | -11.75% May 21, 2013 - Jul 17, 2013 |
| #13 | -7.89% Mar 13, 2000 - Mar 22, 2000 | -11.53% Jan 17, 2018 - May 10, 2018 |
| #14 | -7.69% Nov 9, 2020 - Dec 9, 2020 | -11.45% Aug 3, 2021 - Sep 27, 2021 |
| #15 | -7.66% Aug 10, 2020 - Oct 14, 2020 | -9.96% Sep 29, 2021 - Nov 16, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between CCZ and TM is 0.91 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
CCZ vs TM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | CCZ | TM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.41% | 0.00% |
| 2025 | 3.01% | 2.95% |
| 2024 | 3.44% | 2.81% |
| 2023 | 1.99% | 2.45% |
| 2022 | 3.39% | 2.90% |
| 2021 | 2.36% | 2.45% |
| 2020 | 3.02% | 2.74% |
| 2019 | 1.27% | 1.30% |
| 2018 | 2.31% | 3.40% |
| 2017 | 2.50% | 2.96% |
| 2016 | 3.48% | 3.23% |
| 2015 | 3.70% | 5.59% |
| 2014 | 3.09% | 2.57% |
| 2013 | 6.66% | 2.08% |
| 2012 | 7.92% | 1.59% |
| 2011 | 9.62% | 1.90% |
| 2010 | 6.66% | 1.31% |
| 2009 | 8.61% | 1.41% |
| 2008 | 7.77% | 4.19% |
| 2007 | 11.17% | 2.19% |
| 2006 | 8.52% | 1.99% |
| 2005 | 4.33% | 1.17% |
| 2004 | 3.52% | 1.07% |
| 2003 | 4.15% | 0.91% |
| 2002 | 5.94% | 1.21% |
| 2001 | 2.74% | 0.72% |
| 2000 | 1.66% | 0.93% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks