StockComparison Logo
vs

CCJ vs HL-P-B

Comparison between Cameco Corp (CCJ, Company) and Hecla Mining Company (HL-P-B, Company).

5-Year PerformanceCCJ has outperformed HL-P-B, delivering a return of +37.3% compared to +9.6%

CCJ vs HL-P-B - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
CCJ
$47B
Winner
HL-P-B
$47B
Max Drawdown
Winner
CCJ
90.11%
HL-P-B
92.42%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CCJ
1.19
HL-P-B
0.88
5Y Beta
CCJ
1.48
Winner
HL-P-B
0.12
Industry
CCJ
Uranium
HL-P-B
Other
P/E Ratio
Winner
CCJ
98.57
HL-P-B
146.28
Forward P/E
CCJ
91.74
HL-P-B
N/A
PEG Ratio
CCJ
0.57
Winner
HL-P-B
0.01
Dividend Yield
CCJ
0.21%
HL-P-B
N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR
Winner
CCJ
23.04%
HL-P-B
0.00%
Debt to Equity
CCJ
14.11%
Winner
HL-P-B
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
CCJ
1.41%
HL-P-B
0.66%
P/S Ratio
CCJ
13.23
HL-P-B
N/A
P/B Ratio
CCJ
9.15
HL-P-B
N/A

CCJ vs HL-P-B - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CCJ
-9.66%
Winner
HL-P-B
+2.52%
3M
CCJ
-9.48%
Winner
HL-P-B
-2.78%
6M
Winner
CCJ
+13.30%
HL-P-B
+11.87%
1Y
Winner
CCJ
+72.59%
HL-P-B
+38.54%
5Y(CAGR)
Winner
CCJ
+37.33%
HL-P-B
+9.58%
10Y(CAGR)
Winner
CCJ
+25.25%
HL-P-B
+8.06%
Max(CAGR)
Winner
CCJ
+16.16%
HL-P-B
+9.14%

CCJ vs HL-P-B - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCCJHL-P-B
2026+4.92%-3.48%
2025+75.75%+43.01%
2024+22.48%+4.03%
2023+88.26%+0.10%
2022+0.21%+6.53%
2021+63.29%+1.30%
2020+50.79%+21.07%
2019-21.36%+1.26%
2018+17.72%+8.38%
2017-7.65%+2.16%
2016-9.70%+6.13%
2015-22.35%+13.90%
2014-17.55%+5.03%
2013+4.77%N/A
2012+7.12%N/A
2011-54.76%N/A
2010+22.69%N/A
2009+67.88%N/A
2008-57.86%N/A
2007+1.71%N/A
2006+19.51%N/A
2005+91.08%N/A
2004+79.66%N/A
2003+139.47%N/A
2002-0.58%N/A
2001+46.91%N/A
2000+19.86%N/A
1999-9.23%N/A

CCJ vs HL-P-B Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CCJ was -87.53%, occurring on Mar 18, 2020. Recovery took 4132 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for HL-P-B was -91.82%, occurring on Oct 20, 2017. Recovery took 356 trading sessions.

The current CCJ drawdown is -22.88%. The current HL-P-B drawdown is -33.78%.

RankCCJHL-P-B
#1-87.53%
Jun 15, 2007 - Nov 13, 2023		-91.82%
Aug 5, 2016 - Jan 4, 2018
#2-47.40%
Mar 6, 2002 - Jun 2, 2003		-37.25%
Jan 26, 2026 - Mar 26, 2026
#3-40.14%
Nov 2, 1999 - Dec 8, 2000		-24.31%
Mar 6, 2020 - Apr 13, 2020
#4-40.01%
Dec 5, 2024 - Jun 9, 2025		-21.02%
Feb 14, 2022 - Jul 28, 2023
#5-33.53%
May 31, 2024 - Oct 16, 2024		-20.13%
Jul 28, 2023 - Sep 22, 2025
#6-30.79%
May 21, 2001 - Feb 8, 2002		-17.29%
Jan 4, 2018 - Feb 12, 2019
#7-28.35%
May 10, 2006 - Apr 4, 2007		-16.37%
Feb 12, 2019 - Jan 8, 2020
#8-27.84%
Jan 5, 2004 - Jul 14, 2004		-13.86%
Jul 13, 2015 - Feb 10, 2016
#9-25.69%
Oct 28, 2025 - Jan 9, 2026		-12.73%
Jul 17, 2020 - Jan 4, 2021
#10-24.56%
Mar 18, 2005 - Jul 19, 2005		-11.49%
Dec 14, 2021 - Jan 14, 2022
#11-24.27%
Jan 28, 2026 - Mar 20, 2026		-11.23%
Jan 13, 2021 - Mar 25, 2021
#12-21.74%
Feb 1, 2024 - May 6, 2024		-10.28%
Dec 19, 2025 - Jan 14, 2026
#13-15.25%
Jan 31, 2006 - Apr 17, 2006		-9.70%
Jul 27, 2016 - Aug 5, 2016
#14-14.91%
Dec 12, 2000 - Jan 9, 2001		-9.14%
May 20, 2015 - Jun 29, 2015
#15-14.21%
Oct 4, 2005 - Nov 21, 2005		-8.20%
Jun 13, 2016 - Jul 25, 2016

Correlation

Correlation between CCJ and HL-P-B is 0.88 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.88
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CCJ vs HL-P-B dividend yield comparison.

YearCCJHL-P-B
20260.00%1.29%
20250.19%4.93%
20240.22%6.62%
20230.20%6.43%
20220.39%6.03%
20210.29%6.14%
20200.46%5.97%
20190.67%6.73%
20180.53%6.38%
20174.33%6.60%
20163.82%6.33%
20153.24%6.33%
20142.44%1.69%
20131.93%0.00%
20122.03%0.00%
20112.22%0.00%
20100.69%0.00%
20090.75%0.00%
20081.39%0.00%
20070.50%0.00%
20060.38%0.00%
20050.36%0.00%
20040.57%0.00%
20031.04%0.00%
20022.08%0.00%
20012.02%0.00%
20002.60%0.00%
19990.82%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare

Popular: CCJ vs SPYHL-P-B vs SPY