StockComparison Logo
vs

CBU vs USLM

Comparison between Community Bank System Inc (CBU, Company) and United States Lime & Minerals Inc (USLM, Company).

CBU is from the Financial Services sector, while USLM is from the Basic Materials sector.

5-Year PerformanceUSLM has outperformed CBU, delivering a return of +31.5% compared to +0.5%

CBU vs USLM - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
Winner
CBU
$3.43B
USLM
$3.42B
Max Drawdown
Winner
CBU
54.44%
USLM
64.71%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
CBU
0.67
USLM
0.25
5Y Beta
Winner
CBU
0.86
USLM
1.22
Industry
CBU
Banks - Regional
USLM
Building Materials
P/E Ratio
Winner
CBU
15.25
USLM
25.38
Forward P/E
CBU
15.77
Winner
USLM
15.24
PEG Ratio
Winner
CBU
0.65
USLM
1.60
Dividend Yield
Winner
CBU
2.94%
USLM
0.20%
5Y Dividends CAGR
CBU
2.28%
Winner
USLM
18.57%
5Y EPS CAGR
CBU
5.39%
Winner
USLM
37.75%
Debt to Equity
CBU
0.00%
USLM
0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
CBU
7.20%
USLM
2.68%

CBU vs USLM - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
CBU
-2.98%
Winner
USLM
+13.62%
3M
Winner
CBU
+7.98%
USLM
+7.42%
6M
CBU
+0.53%
Winner
USLM
+8.36%
1Y
Winner
CBU
+15.16%
USLM
-4.19%
5Y(CAGR)
CBU
+0.47%
Winner
USLM
+31.52%
10Y(CAGR)
CBU
+6.88%
Winner
USLM
+26.34%
Max(CAGR)
CBU
+9.81%
Winner
USLM
+18.46%

CBU vs USLM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearCBUUSLM
2026+14.79%-2.83%
2025-2.88%-1.75%
2024+21.47%+189.33%
2023-13.25%+68.82%
2022-13.90%+8.82%
2021+22.82%+12.51%
2020-9.71%+28.58%
2019+22.82%+33.64%
2018+10.84%-7.86%
2017-10.99%+4.41%
2016+64.39%+38.83%
2015+9.46%-22.95%
2014+0.74%+22.01%
2013+44.86%+23.60%
2012+0.56%-24.29%
2011+2.57%+36.92%
2010+47.64%+24.13%
2009-14.82%+38.12%
2008+29.07%-22.29%
2007-11.56%+1.47%
2006+4.38%+15.69%
2005-14.00%+136.55%
2004+19.34%+54.00%
2003+58.16%+80.11%
2002+24.44%-29.97%
2001+8.33%+15.25%
2000+12.98%-26.20%
1999-11.65%-8.63%

CBU vs USLM Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CBU was -53.42%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 568 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for USLM was -62.52%, occurring on Apr 11, 2003. Recovery took 932 trading sessions.

The current CBU drawdown is -7.49%. The current USLM drawdown is -25.19%.

RankCBUUSLM
#1-53.42%
Sep 19, 2008 - Dec 21, 2010
-62.52%
Mar 14, 2000 - Nov 28, 2003
#2-51.06%
Mar 12, 2021 - Jul 16, 2026
-58.98%
Jun 23, 2008 - Jul 15, 2009
#3-34.00%
Dec 31, 2004 - Mar 20, 2008
-45.87%
Nov 26, 2024 - Mar 10, 2025
#4-31.84%
Jan 16, 2020 - Jan 22, 2021
-38.36%
Nov 12, 2014 - Nov 23, 2016
#5-23.48%
Nov 19, 1999 - Sep 27, 2000
-37.72%
Feb 3, 2012 - Jun 9, 2014
#6-23.21%
Jan 23, 2004 - Aug 27, 2004
-35.13%
Sep 27, 2005 - Aug 28, 2006
#7-22.89%
Apr 28, 2008 - Sep 18, 2008
-34.95%
Dec 4, 2019 - Aug 12, 2020
#8-22.13%
Dec 22, 2010 - Dec 22, 2011
-33.44%
Mar 10, 2021 - Feb 6, 2023
#9-20.32%
Jan 4, 2017 - May 17, 2018
-32.71%
Mar 15, 2005 - Jun 10, 2005
#10-19.44%
Nov 30, 2015 - Jun 23, 2016
-30.26%
Oct 17, 2017 - Nov 25, 2019
#11-18.57%
May 3, 2002 - Jan 13, 2003
-30.08%
Jul 1, 2004 - Jan 31, 2005
#12-17.22%
Aug 22, 2018 - Apr 24, 2019
-29.47%
Jul 21, 2009 - Oct 14, 2011
#13-16.51%
Dec 26, 2013 - Jun 26, 2015
-27.05%
Jul 10, 2007 - Jun 9, 2008
#14-15.18%
Aug 21, 2001 - Feb 22, 2002
-23.04%
Jan 20, 2004 - Jun 16, 2004
#15-14.91%
Sep 27, 2000 - Jan 4, 2001
-20.85%
Nov 17, 1999 - Mar 2, 2000

Correlation

Correlation between CBU and USLM is 0.66 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.

0.66
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

CBU vs USLM dividend yield comparison.

YearCBUUSLM
20261.43%0.10%
20253.24%0.20%
20242.95%0.15%
20233.42%0.35%
20222.76%0.57%
20212.28%0.50%
20202.66%0.56%
20192.23%6.52%
20182.47%0.76%
20172.46%0.70%
20162.04%0.66%
20153.05%0.91%
20143.04%0.69%
20132.77%0.00%
20123.87%0.00%
20113.60%0.00%
20103.38%0.00%
20094.56%0.00%
20083.53%0.00%
20074.13%0.00%
20063.39%0.00%
20053.28%0.00%
20042.41%0.00%
20032.49%0.74%
20023.57%2.70%
20014.12%1.77%
20004.20%2.00%
19991.08%0.36%

Select Stocks to Compare