CBU vs NAMS

Comparison between Community Bank System Inc (CBU, Company) and NewAmsterdam Pharma Company NV (NAMS, Company).

CBU is from the Financial Services sector, while NAMS is from the Healthcare sector.

CBU vs NAMS - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CBU(COMPANY)	NAMS(COMPANY)
Market Cap	$3.42B	$3.42B
Max Drawdown	54.44%	66.23%
Sharpe Ratio	0.69	0.79
5Y Beta	0.85	1.01
Industry	Banks - Regional	Biotechnology
P/E Ratio	16.05	-15.76
Forward P/E	15.77	N/A
PEG Ratio	0.76	-6.92
Dividend Yield	2.86%	N/A
5Y Dividends CAGR	2.29%	N/A
5Y EPS CAGR	3.55%	N/A
Debt to Equity	0.00%	0.00%
Free Cash Flow Yield	7.07%	-4.15%
P/S Ratio	4.21	151.95
P/B Ratio	1.69	5.15

Market Cap

CBU

$3.42B

Winner

NAMS

$3.42B

Max Drawdown

Winner

CBU

54.44%

NAMS

66.23%

Sharpe Ratio

CBU

0.69

Winner

NAMS

0.79

5Y Beta

Winner

CBU

0.85

NAMS

1.01

Industry

CBU

Banks - Regional

NAMS

Biotechnology

P/E Ratio

CBU

16.05

Winner

NAMS

-15.76

Forward P/E

CBU

15.77

NAMS

N/A

PEG Ratio

CBU

0.76

Winner

NAMS

-6.92

Dividend Yield

CBU

2.86%

NAMS

N/A

5Y Dividends CAGR

CBU

2.29%

NAMS

N/A

5Y EPS CAGR

CBU

3.55%

NAMS

N/A

Debt to Equity

CBU

0.00%

NAMS

0.00%

Free Cash Flow Yield

Winner

CBU

7.07%

NAMS

-4.15%

P/S Ratio

Winner

CBU

4.21

NAMS

151.95

P/B Ratio

Winner

CBU

1.69

NAMS

5.15

CBU vs NAMS - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CBU	NAMS
1 month	+5.92%	-21.83%
3 months	+16.49%	+1.95%
6 months	+11.10%	-18.39%
1 year	+19.62%	+44.56%
5 years(CAGR)	-0.38%	N/A
10 years(CAGR)	+7.89%	N/A
Max(CAGR)	+9.87%	+35.45%

Winner

CBU

+5.92%

NAMS

-21.83%

Winner

CBU

+16.49%

NAMS

+1.95%

Winner

CBU

+11.10%

NAMS

-18.39%

CBU

+19.62%

Winner

NAMS

+44.56%

5Y(CAGR)

CBU

-0.38%

NAMS

N/A

10Y(CAGR)

CBU

+7.89%

NAMS

N/A

Max(CAGR)

CBU

+9.87%

Winner

NAMS

+35.45%

CBU vs NAMS - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CBU	NAMS
2026	+14.79%	-13.64%
2025	-2.88%	+35.13%
2024	+21.47%	+115.06%
2023	-13.25%	-0.27%
2022	-13.90%	+5.31%
2021	+22.82%	N/A
2020	-9.71%	N/A
2019	+22.82%	N/A
2018	+10.84%	N/A
2017	-10.99%	N/A
2016	+64.39%	N/A
2015	+9.46%	N/A
2014	+0.74%	N/A
2013	+44.86%	N/A
2012	+0.56%	N/A
2011	+2.57%	N/A
2010	+47.64%	N/A
2009	-14.82%	N/A
2008	+29.07%	N/A
2007	-11.56%	N/A
2006	+4.38%	N/A
2005	-14.00%	N/A
2004	+19.34%	N/A
2003	+58.16%	N/A
2002	+24.44%	N/A
2001	+8.33%	N/A
2000	+12.98%	N/A
1999	-11.65%	N/A

CBU vs NAMS Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CBU was -53.42%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 568 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for NAMS was -66.23%, occurring on Oct 25, 2023. Recovery took 244 trading sessions.

The current CBU drawdown is -6.24%. The current NAMS drawdown is -26.66%.

Rank	CBU	NAMS
#1	-53.42% Sep 19, 2008 - Dec 21, 2010	-66.23% Jan 30, 2023 - Jan 19, 2024
#2	-51.06% Mar 12, 2021 - Oct 24, 2023	-44.01% Dec 17, 2024 - Sep 5, 2025
#3	-34.00% Dec 31, 2004 - Mar 20, 2008	-37.10% Feb 27, 2024 - Nov 11, 2024
#4	-31.84% Jan 16, 2020 - Jan 22, 2021	-31.41% Nov 26, 2025 - Apr 29, 2026
#5	-23.48% Nov 19, 1999 - Sep 27, 2000	-27.63% Nov 14, 2024 - Dec 10, 2024
#6	-23.21% Jan 23, 2004 - Aug 27, 2004	-21.74% Nov 23, 2022 - Dec 15, 2022
#7	-22.89% Apr 28, 2008 - Sep 18, 2008	-19.25% Dec 15, 2022 - Jan 26, 2023
#8	-22.13% Dec 22, 2010 - Dec 22, 2011	-18.58% Jan 25, 2024 - Feb 27, 2024
#9	-20.32% Jan 4, 2017 - May 17, 2018	-13.47% Oct 15, 2025 - Nov 26, 2025
#10	-19.44% Nov 30, 2015 - Jun 23, 2016	-10.67% Sep 5, 2025 - Sep 22, 2025
#11	-18.57% May 3, 2002 - Jan 13, 2003	-5.73% Dec 10, 2024 - Dec 17, 2024
#12	-17.22% Aug 22, 2018 - Apr 24, 2019	-3.44% Sep 26, 2025 - Oct 1, 2025
#13	-16.51% Dec 26, 2013 - Jun 26, 2015	-2.81% Sep 22, 2025 - Sep 26, 2025
#14	-15.18% Aug 21, 2001 - Feb 22, 2002	-0.83% Oct 6, 2025 - Oct 8, 2025
#15	-14.91% Sep 27, 2000 - Jan 4, 2001	-0.65% Nov 12, 2024 - Nov 14, 2024