BBH vs EWM
Comparison between VANECK BIOTECH ETF (BBH, ETF) and ISHARES MSCI MALAYSIA ETF (EWM, ETF).
5-Year PerformanceEWM has outperformed BBH, delivering a return of +4.6% compared to -0.4%
BBH vs EWM - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BBH vs EWM - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BBH vs EWM - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BBH | EWM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -0.45% | +0.72% |
| 2025 | +21.12% | +16.66% |
| 2024 | -6.57% | +20.51% |
| 2023 | +4.69% | -2.49% |
| 2022 | -13.94% | -5.72% |
| 2021 | +12.14% | -6.13% |
| 2020 | +21.96% | +1.74% |
| 2019 | +25.85% | -1.18% |
| 2018 | -12.90% | -7.09% |
| 2017 | +14.01% | +24.23% |
| 2016 | -12.74% | -0.83% |
| 2015 | +9.32% | -18.80% |
| 2014 | +30.02% | -9.26% |
| 2013 | +59.99% | +7.09% |
| 2012 | +46.06% | +13.35% |
| 2011 | +20.65% | -3.80% |
| 2010 | +1.19% | +34.92% |
| 2009 | +10.12% | +44.85% |
| 2008 | +10.40% | -39.09% |
| 2007 | -6.69% | +41.48% |
| 2006 | -6.05% | +36.15% |
| 2005 | +32.53% | +0.85% |
| 2004 | +12.42% | +14.35% |
| 2003 | +55.19% | +29.61% |
| 2002 | -35.25% | +1.25% |
| 2001 | -17.55% | +6.98% |
| 2000 | +16.55% | -31.70% |
| 1999 | +37.45% | +29.88% |
BBH vs EWM Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BBH was -72.70%, occurring on Jul 10, 2002. Recovery took 2793 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for EWM was -52.14%, occurring on Oct 27, 2008. Recovery took 661 trading sessions.
The current BBH drawdown is -12.13%. The current EWM drawdown is -10.82%.
| Rank | BBH | EWM |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -72.70% Mar 3, 2000 - Apr 11, 2011 | -52.14% Jan 14, 2008 - Aug 27, 2010 |
| #2 | -39.86% Aug 9, 2021 - Jun 13, 2022 | -51.81% Jan 18, 2000 - Jul 21, 2005 |
| #3 | -33.76% Jul 20, 2015 - Dec 20, 2019 | -50.35% Aug 27, 2014 - Mar 19, 2020 |
| #4 | -22.00% Feb 24, 2014 - Aug 26, 2014 | -22.25% Jul 7, 2011 - Sep 14, 2012 |
| #5 | -20.88% Feb 21, 2020 - Apr 17, 2020 | -18.11% Feb 23, 2007 - Apr 3, 2007 |
| #6 | -18.37% Jul 1, 2011 - Oct 27, 2011 | -16.67% Jan 3, 2000 - Jan 13, 2000 |
| #7 | -14.79% Jul 20, 2020 - Dec 17, 2020 | -16.57% May 18, 2007 - Oct 5, 2007 |
| #8 | -14.49% Feb 12, 2021 - Jun 9, 2021 | -16.13% May 14, 2013 - Jul 2, 2014 |
| #9 | -13.29% Jan 21, 2000 - Feb 8, 2000 | -13.60% May 10, 2006 - Nov 2, 2006 |
| #10 | -11.98% May 14, 2013 - Jul 11, 2013 | -8.42% Aug 9, 2005 - Feb 3, 2006 |
| #11 | -11.41% Dec 30, 1999 - Jan 10, 2000 | -7.80% Jan 17, 2013 - Apr 9, 2013 |
| #12 | -10.72% Oct 5, 2012 - Jan 8, 2013 | -7.63% Oct 31, 2007 - Dec 6, 2007 |
| #13 | -10.69% Jan 10, 2000 - Jan 19, 2000 | -7.04% Jan 13, 2011 - Apr 1, 2011 |
| #14 | -10.21% Sep 24, 2014 - Oct 23, 2014 | -6.00% Dec 6, 2007 - Jan 3, 2008 |
| #15 | -9.86% Sep 18, 2013 - Nov 21, 2013 | -5.42% Nov 4, 2010 - Dec 29, 2010 |
Correlation
Correlation between BBH and EWM is 0.64 which considered as a moderate positive correlation - the stocks show some tendency to move together.
Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)
BBH vs EWM dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BBH | EWM |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 0.00% | 2.11% |
| 2025 | 0.51% | 3.41% |
| 2024 | 0.80% | 3.32% |
| 2023 | 0.43% | 3.47% |
| 2022 | 0.47% | 3.00% |
| 2021 | 0.21% | 6.48% |
| 2020 | 0.36% | 1.89% |
| 2019 | 0.34% | 2.91% |
| 2018 | 0.50% | 3.84% |
| 2017 | 0.55% | 5.58% |
| 2016 | 0.30% | 5.97% |
| 2015 | 0.27% | 37.54% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 4.03% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 3.03% |
| 2012 | 0.34% | 1.58% |
| 2011 | 10.35% | 4.46% |
| 2010 | 0.02% | 2.40% |
| 2009 | 87.09% | 2.30% |
| 2008 | 3.64% | 5.21% |
| 2007 | 6.23% | 3.19% |
| 2006 | 4.20% | 2.15% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 4.23% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 2.20% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 1.61% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 1.86% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 1.48% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 1.35% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks