BAC-P-N vs LMT
Comparison between Bank Of America Corp. PRF PERPETUAL USD Ser LL DpSh11000th (BAC-P-N, Company) and Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT, Company).
5-Year PerformanceLMT has outperformed BAC-P-N, delivering a return of +14.3% compared to -1.3%
BAC-P-N vs LMT - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
BAC-P-N vs LMT - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
BAC-P-N vs LMT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | BAC-P-N | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | -6.28% | +23.59% |
| 2025 | +1.21% | +3.27% |
| 2024 | +6.36% | +9.33% |
| 2023 | +15.60% | -2.52% |
| 2022 | -22.54% | +40.84% |
| 2021 | +3.02% | +6.29% |
| 2020 | +9.12% | -8.79% |
| 2019 | +6.12% | +50.87% |
| 2018 | N/A | -15.68% |
| 2017 | N/A | +30.00% |
| 2016 | N/A | +20.57% |
| 2015 | N/A | +15.74% |
| 2014 | N/A | +36.10% |
| 2013 | N/A | +66.25% |
| 2012 | N/A | +17.87% |
| 2011 | N/A | +20.76% |
| 2010 | N/A | -5.71% |
| 2009 | N/A | -9.17% |
| 2008 | N/A | -18.65% |
| 2007 | N/A | +16.16% |
| 2006 | N/A | +47.16% |
| 2005 | N/A | +19.38% |
| 2004 | N/A | +11.48% |
| 2003 | N/A | -11.58% |
| 2002 | N/A | +25.83% |
| 2001 | N/A | +38.37% |
| 2000 | N/A | +70.69% |
| 1999 | N/A | +9.87% |
BAC-P-N vs LMT Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for BAC-P-N was -28.12%, occurring on Mar 23, 2020. Recovery took 111 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for LMT was -50.57%, occurring on Mar 11, 2009. Recovery took 1176 trading sessions.
The current BAC-P-N drawdown is -11.71%. The current LMT drawdown is -9.68%.
| Rank | BAC-P-N | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -28.12% Feb 11, 2020 - Jul 21, 2020 | -50.57% Aug 28, 2008 - May 2, 2013 |
| #2 | -24.99% Jun 23, 2021 - Sep 13, 2024 | -42.05% Jun 27, 2002 - Feb 1, 2006 |
| #3 | -14.88% Sep 26, 2024 - May 21, 2025 | -36.66% Feb 11, 2020 - Feb 28, 2022 |
| #4 | -5.50% Dec 21, 2020 - Apr 15, 2021 | -31.79% Oct 21, 2024 - Jan 22, 2026 |
| #5 | -4.27% Aug 20, 2020 - Nov 24, 2020 | -30.32% Feb 15, 2018 - Jun 4, 2019 |
| #6 | -2.42% Oct 25, 2019 - Dec 11, 2019 | -26.86% Mar 2, 2026 - Jun 24, 2026 |
| #7 | -2.34% May 5, 2021 - Jun 1, 2021 | -23.51% Dec 31, 1999 - Apr 12, 2000 |
| #8 | -2.02% Jan 2, 2020 - Feb 3, 2020 | -19.68% Apr 18, 2023 - Jul 23, 2024 |
| #9 | -1.17% Nov 25, 2020 - Dec 4, 2020 | -16.93% Apr 13, 2022 - Oct 27, 2022 |
| #10 | -0.62% Apr 27, 2021 - May 5, 2021 | -15.49% Oct 31, 2000 - Feb 1, 2001 |
| #11 | -0.59% Dec 9, 2020 - Dec 15, 2020 | -13.66% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 18, 1999 |
| #12 | -0.56% Sep 12, 2019 - Sep 19, 2019 | -12.93% Mar 7, 2001 - May 21, 2001 |
| #13 | -0.55% Jun 14, 2021 - Jun 22, 2021 | -12.90% Aug 15, 2016 - Nov 14, 2016 |
| #14 | -0.44% Apr 16, 2021 - Apr 23, 2021 | -12.74% May 1, 2000 - Jul 25, 2000 |
| #15 | -0.44% Jun 4, 2021 - Jun 14, 2021 | -11.80% Oct 26, 2001 - Jan 25, 2002 |
Correlation
Correlation between BAC-P-N and LMT is 0.25 which considered as a very weak or no correlation - the stocks move independently of each other.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
BAC-P-N vs LMT dividend yield comparison.
| Year | BAC-P-N | LMT |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 3.28% | 1.14% |
| 2025 | 6.02% | 2.76% |
| 2024 | 5.79% | 2.62% |
| 2023 | 5.81% | 2.68% |
| 2022 | 6.43% | 2.34% |
| 2021 | 4.70% | 2.98% |
| 2020 | 4.58% | 2.76% |
| 2019 | 1.19% | 2.31% |
| 2018 | 0.00% | 3.13% |
| 2017 | 0.00% | 2.32% |
| 2016 | 0.00% | 2.71% |
| 2015 | 0.00% | 2.83% |
| 2014 | 0.00% | 2.85% |
| 2013 | 0.00% | 3.22% |
| 2012 | 0.00% | 4.50% |
| 2011 | 0.00% | 4.02% |
| 2010 | 0.00% | 3.78% |
| 2009 | 0.00% | 3.11% |
| 2008 | 0.00% | 2.18% |
| 2007 | 0.00% | 1.40% |
| 2006 | 0.00% | 1.36% |
| 2005 | 0.00% | 1.65% |
| 2004 | 0.00% | 1.64% |
| 2003 | 0.00% | 1.13% |
| 2002 | 0.00% | 0.76% |
| 2001 | 0.00% | 0.94% |
| 2000 | 0.00% | 1.30% |
| 1999 | 0.00% | 1.01% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks