LMT vs BAC-P-E
Comparison between Lockheed Martin Corp (LMT, Company) and Bank Of America Corp (BAC-P-E, Company).
5-Year PerformanceLMT has outperformed BAC-P-E, delivering a return of +14.3% compared to -1.0%
LMT vs BAC-P-E - Performance Comparison
Key Characteristics
Financial metrics and valuation ratios
LMT vs BAC-P-E - Historical Returns
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
LMT vs BAC-P-E - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)
Returns include dividend reinvestment.
| Year | LMT | BAC-P-E |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | +23.59% | -0.96% |
| 2025 | +3.27% | -16.25% |
| 2024 | +9.33% | +11.83% |
| 2023 | -2.52% | +30.80% |
| 2022 | +40.84% | -24.50% |
| 2021 | +6.29% | +5.64% |
| 2020 | -8.79% | +7.61% |
| 2019 | +50.87% | +27.06% |
| 2018 | -15.68% | -12.72% |
| 2017 | +30.00% | +12.91% |
| 2016 | +20.57% | +2.94% |
| 2015 | +15.74% | +15.34% |
| 2014 | +36.10% | +6.66% |
| 2013 | +66.25% | -3.71% |
| 2012 | +17.87% | +40.93% |
| 2011 | +20.76% | -8.39% |
| 2010 | -5.71% | +8.89% |
| 2009 | -9.17% | +62.61% |
| 2008 | -18.65% | -35.97% |
| 2007 | +16.16% | -15.97% |
| 2006 | +47.16% | -1.96% |
| 2005 | +19.38% | N/A |
| 2004 | +11.48% | N/A |
| 2003 | -11.58% | N/A |
| 2002 | +25.83% | N/A |
| 2001 | +38.37% | N/A |
| 2000 | +70.69% | N/A |
| 1999 | +9.87% | N/A |
LMT vs BAC-P-E Drawdown Comparison
The maximum drawdown for LMT was -50.57%, occurring on Mar 11, 2009. Recovery took 1176 trading sessions.
The maximum drawdown for BAC-P-E was -84.61%, occurring on Feb 23, 2009. Recovery took 1065 trading sessions.
The current LMT drawdown is -9.68%. The current BAC-P-E drawdown is -18.93%.
| Rank | LMT | BAC-P-E |
|---|---|---|
| #1 | -50.57% Aug 28, 2008 - May 2, 2013 | -84.61% Feb 28, 2007 - May 19, 2011 |
| #2 | -42.05% Jun 27, 2002 - Feb 1, 2006 | -35.27% May 19, 2011 - Feb 7, 2012 |
| #3 | -36.66% Feb 11, 2020 - Feb 28, 2022 | -29.06% Feb 6, 2020 - Jul 22, 2020 |
| #4 | -31.79% Oct 21, 2024 - Jan 22, 2026 | -27.13% Jul 30, 2021 - Jan 24, 2024 |
| #5 | -30.32% Feb 15, 2018 - Jun 4, 2019 | -23.29% Sep 4, 2018 - Aug 13, 2019 |
| #6 | -26.86% Mar 2, 2026 - Jun 24, 2026 | -20.98% May 17, 2013 - Nov 19, 2015 |
| #7 | -23.51% Dec 31, 1999 - Apr 12, 2000 | -20.37% Nov 5, 2024 - Dec 29, 2025 |
| #8 | -19.68% Apr 18, 2023 - Jul 23, 2024 | -17.84% Mar 8, 2012 - Sep 21, 2012 |
| #9 | -16.93% Apr 13, 2022 - Oct 27, 2022 | -17.36% Oct 17, 2016 - Jun 29, 2018 |
| #10 | -15.49% Oct 31, 2000 - Feb 1, 2001 | -8.30% Jan 5, 2016 - Apr 20, 2016 |
| #11 | -13.66% Nov 1, 1999 - Nov 18, 1999 | -5.87% Dec 1, 2015 - Dec 31, 2015 |
| #12 | -12.93% Mar 7, 2001 - May 21, 2001 | -4.97% Jan 11, 2013 - Mar 12, 2013 |
| #13 | -12.90% Aug 15, 2016 - Nov 14, 2016 | -4.04% Oct 17, 2012 - Jan 7, 2013 |
| #14 | -12.74% May 1, 2000 - Jul 25, 2000 | -3.95% May 31, 2024 - Aug 15, 2024 |
| #15 | -11.80% Oct 26, 2001 - Jan 25, 2002 | -3.54% Jan 29, 2021 - Apr 6, 2021 |
Correlation
Correlation between LMT and BAC-P-E is 0.91 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.
Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)
LMT vs BAC-P-E dividend yield comparison.
| Year | LMT | BAC-P-E |
|---|---|---|
| 2026 | 1.14% | 4.52% |
| 2025 | 2.76% | 6.67% |
| 2024 | 2.62% | 6.30% |
| 2023 | 2.68% | 6.04% |
| 2022 | 2.34% | 5.54% |
| 2021 | 2.98% | 3.97% |
| 2020 | 2.76% | 4.02% |
| 2019 | 2.31% | 5.70% |
| 2018 | 3.13% | 5.08% |
| 2017 | 2.32% | 4.26% |
| 2016 | 2.71% | 4.66% |
| 2015 | 2.83% | 4.53% |
| 2014 | 2.85% | 4.96% |
| 2013 | 3.22% | 5.04% |
| 2012 | 4.50% | 3.51% |
| 2011 | 4.02% | 6.33% |
| 2010 | 3.78% | 5.52% |
| 2009 | 3.11% | 5.68% |
| 2008 | 2.18% | 9.09% |
| 2007 | 1.40% | 7.46% |
| 2006 | 1.36% | 0.00% |
| 2005 | 1.65% | 0.00% |
| 2004 | 1.64% | 0.00% |
| 2003 | 1.13% | 0.00% |
| 2002 | 0.76% | 0.00% |
| 2001 | 0.94% | 0.00% |
| 2000 | 1.30% | 0.00% |
| 1999 | 1.01% | 0.00% |
Select Stocks to Compare
More Comparisons
Compare with similar stocks