AWF vs MOO

Comparison between AllianceBernstein Global High Income Fund Inc (AWF, ETF) and VANECK AGRIBUSINESS ETF (MOO, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceAWF has outperformed MOO, delivering a return of +3.8% compared to +1.2%

AWF vs MOO - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	AWF(ETF)	MOO(ETF)
Net Assets	$971M	$975M
Expense Ratio	N/A	0.56%
Max Drawdown	58.11%	69.53%
Sharpe Ratio	-0.63	0.93
5Y Beta	0.35	0.50
P/E Ratio	N/A	22.93
Forward P/E	N/A	16.21
PEG Ratio	N/A	0.21
5Y Dividends CAGR	0.00%	18.30%
Debt to Equity	N/A	57.98%
P/S Ratio	N/A	0.90
P/B Ratio	N/A	2.07

Net Assets

AWF

$971M

Winner

MOO

$975M

Expense Ratio

AWF

N/A

MOO

0.56%

Max Drawdown

Winner

AWF

58.11%

MOO

69.53%

Sharpe Ratio

AWF

-0.63

Winner

MOO

0.93

5Y Beta

Winner

AWF

0.35

MOO

0.50

P/E Ratio

AWF

N/A

MOO

22.93

Forward P/E

AWF

N/A

MOO

16.21

PEG Ratio

AWF

N/A

MOO

0.21

5Y Dividends CAGR

AWF

0.00%

Winner

MOO

18.30%

Debt to Equity

AWF

N/A

MOO

57.98%

P/S Ratio

AWF

N/A

MOO

0.90

P/B Ratio

AWF

N/A

MOO

2.07

AWF vs MOO - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	AWF	MOO
1 month	+0.25%	+3.70%
3 months	+0.85%	+5.88%
6 months	-1.05%	-0.83%
1 year	-2.02%	+17.14%
5 years(CAGR)	+3.82%	+1.24%
10 years(CAGR)	+5.20%	+7.47%
Max(CAGR)	+9.90%	+5.72%

AWF

+0.25%

Winner

MOO

+3.70%

AWF

+0.85%

Winner

MOO

+5.88%

AWF

-1.05%

Winner

MOO

-0.83%

AWF

-2.02%

Winner

MOO

+17.14%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

AWF

+3.82%

MOO

+1.24%

10Y(CAGR)

AWF

+5.20%

Winner

MOO

+7.47%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

AWF

+9.90%

MOO

+5.72%

AWF vs MOO - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	AWF	MOO
2026	-0.66%	+15.62%
2025	+7.09%	+15.58%
2024	+13.51%	-12.50%
2023	+16.57%	-7.83%
2022	-16.82%	-7.72%
2021	+9.58%	+24.09%
2020	+4.70%	+14.10%
2019	+20.19%	+22.54%
2018	-11.22%	-6.98%
2017	+6.58%	+21.38%
2016	+23.68%	+14.26%
2015	-4.85%	-8.82%
2014	-3.55%	+0.86%
2013	-0.91%	+2.62%
2012	+18.15%	+10.70%
2011	+10.23%	-11.98%
2010	+16.72%	+20.29%
2009	+87.04%	+50.15%
2008	-30.41%	-50.62%
2007	+5.03%	+39.44%
2006	+20.10%	N/A
2005	+8.30%	N/A
2004	+3.32%	N/A
2003	+45.46%	N/A
2002	+12.40%	N/A
2001	+26.10%	N/A
2000	+6.73%	N/A
1999	-6.33%	N/A

AWF vs MOO Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for AWF was -55.54%, occurring on Nov 21, 2008. Recovery took 293 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for MOO was -69.53%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 2291 trading sessions.

The current AWF drawdown is -4.89%. The current MOO drawdown is -12.29%.

Rank	AWF	MOO
#1	-55.54% Jun 4, 2008 - Aug 3, 2009	-69.53% Jun 17, 2008 - Jul 24, 2017
#2	-40.12% Feb 20, 2020 - Dec 30, 2020	-39.51% Apr 20, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025
#3	-25.23% Nov 12, 2021 - Mar 1, 2024	-36.75% Jan 13, 2020 - Sep 2, 2020
#4	-24.59% Jan 23, 2004 - Jan 3, 2005	-17.82% Jan 14, 2008 - Apr 15, 2008
#5	-21.15% May 16, 2013 - Jun 8, 2016	-16.95% Oct 3, 2018 - Jun 19, 2019
#6	-18.61% May 31, 2002 - Dec 30, 2002	-11.26% Nov 6, 2007 - Dec 5, 2007
#7	-18.10% Jun 4, 2007 - Jan 11, 2008	-9.92% Apr 21, 2008 - Jun 17, 2008
#8	-17.55% Jun 29, 2001 - Jan 8, 2002	-9.28% Jan 26, 2018 - Sep 20, 2018
#9	-16.68% Apr 26, 2010 - Jul 29, 2010	-7.05% Nov 5, 2021 - Jan 12, 2022
#10	-15.69% Jul 8, 2011 - Dec 22, 2011	-6.41% May 7, 2021 - Oct 19, 2021
#11	-15.48% Oct 20, 2017 - Apr 11, 2019	-6.07% Jul 23, 2019 - Nov 4, 2019
#12	-13.63% Jul 17, 2000 - Jan 17, 2001	-5.70% Dec 10, 2007 - Dec 21, 2007
#13	-13.05% Jun 17, 2003 - Sep 30, 2003	-5.54% Oct 12, 2020 - Nov 5, 2020
#14	-11.49% Nov 8, 2010 - Apr 1, 2011	-5.48% Jan 20, 2021 - Feb 5, 2021
#15	-11.11% Feb 26, 2025 - Jun 18, 2025	-5.31% Jan 12, 2022 - Feb 9, 2022

Correlation

Correlation between AWF and MOO is 0.87 which considered as a strong positive correlation - the stocks tend to move together.

0.87

-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

AWF vs MOO dividend yield comparison.

Year	AWF	MOO
2026	4.69%	0.00%
2025	7.81%	2.47%
2024	7.47%	3.41%
2023	7.33%	2.93%
2022	10.30%	2.15%
2021	6.48%	1.17%
2020	6.68%	1.10%
2019	6.62%	1.26%
2018	7.97%	1.69%
2017	6.03%	1.44%
2016	7.73%	2.14%
2015	10.28%	2.89%
2014	11.91%	3.21%
2013	11.09%	1.91%
2012	9.21%	1.84%
2011	11.45%	0.64%
2010	8.39%	0.61%
2009	8.41%	0.96%
2008	18.70%	1.01%
2007	13.20%	0.00%
2006	8.09%	0.00%
2005	7.57%	0.00%
2004	7.52%	0.00%
2003	8.08%	0.00%
2002	12.22%	0.00%
2001	14.01%	0.00%
2000	5.12%	0.00%