StockComparison Logo
vs

ASH vs CWT

Comparison between Ashland Inc (ASH, Company) and California Water Service Group (CWT, Company).

ASH is from the Basic Materials sector, while CWT is from the Utilities sector.

5-Year PerformanceCWT has outperformed ASH, delivering a return of -2.1% compared to -8.1%

ASH vs CWT - Performance Comparison

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Market Cap
ASH
$2.64B
Winner
CWT
$2.64B
Max Drawdown
ASH
92.49%
Winner
CWT
41.73%
Sharpe Ratio
Winner
ASH
0.48
CWT
0.10
5Y Beta
ASH
1.09
Winner
CWT
-0.01
Industry
ASH
Specialty Chemicals
CWT
Utilities - Regulated Water
P/E Ratio
Winner
ASH
-3.74
CWT
22.09
Forward P/E
Winner
ASH
12.30
CWT
17.95
PEG Ratio
Winner
ASH
-0.01
CWT
2.01
Dividend Yield
Winner
ASH
2.91%
CWT
2.73%
5Y Dividends CAGR
ASH
8.16%
Winner
CWT
12.15%
5Y EPS CAGR
ASH
N/A
CWT
2.49%
Debt to Equity
ASH
79.21%
Winner
CWT
0.05%
Free Cash Flow Yield
Winner
ASH
12.66%
CWT
11.88%
P/S Ratio
Winner
ASH
1.45
CWT
2.61
P/B Ratio
Winner
ASH
1.41
CWT
1.57

ASH vs CWT - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

1M
Winner
ASH
+8.26%
CWT
+7.34%
3M
ASH
-1.38%
Winner
CWT
+0.91%
6M
ASH
-2.79%
Winner
CWT
+3.72%
1Y
Winner
ASH
+16.59%
CWT
+2.85%
5Y(CAGR)
ASH
-8.07%
Winner
CWT
-2.06%
10Y(CAGR)
ASH
+1.37%
Winner
CWT
+6.47%
Max(CAGR)
ASH
+7.30%
Winner
CWT
+7.43%

ASH vs CWT - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

YearASHCWT
2026-4.84%+8.38%
2025-13.36%-0.56%
2024-13.09%-10.67%
2023-20.90%-14.49%
2022+2.72%-14.14%
2021+37.84%+36.49%
2020+4.76%+8.60%
2019+8.55%+13.02%
2018-1.76%+8.62%
2017+31.46%+36.99%
2016+8.53%+50.02%
2015-12.65%-2.76%
2014+25.15%+13.13%
2013+16.47%+27.66%
2012+40.65%+4.24%
2011+9.54%+0.31%
2010+24.85%+4.11%
2009+266.09%-17.22%
2008-77.02%+30.29%
2007-29.21%-3.71%
2006+38.01%+8.87%
2005+2.41%+7.39%
2004+35.85%+41.17%
2003+57.67%+18.55%
2002-35.05%-1.59%
2001+32.55%+4.86%
2000+15.89%+0.59%
1999-0.35%+1.03%

ASH vs CWT Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for ASH was -91.63%, occurring on Mar 3, 2009. Recovery took 1113 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CWT was -38.22%, occurring on Jan 10, 2025. This drawdown has not yet recovered.

The current ASH drawdown is -46.52%. The current CWT drawdown is -29.45%.

RankASHCWT
#1-91.63%
Dec 27, 2006 - May 31, 2011
-38.22%
Jan 3, 2022 - Jan 10, 2025
#2-57.30%
Dec 2, 2022 - Apr 8, 2025
-31.27%
Dec 27, 1999 - Apr 22, 2003
#3-52.83%
Sep 20, 2018 - Jan 6, 2021
-30.88%
Oct 31, 2007 - Dec 17, 2008
#4-48.00%
Feb 1, 2002 - Dec 29, 2003
-26.71%
Dec 31, 2008 - Feb 19, 2013
#5-37.18%
May 31, 2011 - Jun 19, 2012
-25.99%
Feb 18, 2020 - Jan 6, 2021
#6-31.46%
May 11, 2015 - May 19, 2017
-25.15%
Apr 21, 2006 - Jan 10, 2007
#7-28.39%
Jun 30, 2005 - Mar 31, 2006
-22.54%
Jan 29, 2015 - Feb 12, 2016
#8-22.29%
Apr 19, 2006 - Nov 8, 2006
-21.98%
Nov 30, 2017 - Nov 16, 2018
#9-21.67%
Nov 19, 2021 - Apr 20, 2022
-21.54%
Aug 3, 2005 - Jan 27, 2006
#10-17.55%
Nov 18, 1999 - May 11, 2000
-21.46%
Jan 10, 2007 - Aug 8, 2007
#11-17.28%
Sep 4, 2001 - Dec 4, 2001
-18.56%
Aug 9, 2007 - Oct 29, 2007
#12-15.52%
Jan 10, 2013 - Apr 12, 2013
-17.83%
Jun 18, 2003 - Apr 27, 2004
#13-14.91%
Sep 11, 2000 - Jan 25, 2001
-14.80%
Dec 30, 2004 - Jun 1, 2005
#14-14.88%
Jun 7, 2022 - Nov 15, 2022
-14.76%
Jul 5, 2016 - Nov 22, 2016
#15-14.70%
May 18, 2001 - Sep 4, 2001
-14.67%
Mar 25, 2014 - Jun 27, 2014

Correlation

Correlation between ASH and CWT is 0.95 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.95
-101

Dividend Comparison (1999 - 2026)

ASH vs CWT dividend yield comparison.

YearASHCWT
20261.49%1.46%
20252.81%2.86%
20242.24%2.47%
20231.77%2.01%
20221.21%1.65%
20211.09%1.28%
20201.39%1.57%
20191.40%1.53%
20181.37%1.57%
201788.83%1.59%
20161.43%2.04%
20151.47%2.88%
20141.14%2.64%
20131.28%2.77%
20121.06%3.43%
20111.18%3.37%
20101.03%3.19%
20090.76%3.20%
20088.56%2.52%
20072.32%3.13%
200616.33%3.57%
20051.90%2.98%
20041.88%3.00%
20032.50%4.11%
20023.86%4.74%
20012.39%5.42%
20003.06%4.13%
19990.83%0.00%

Select Stocks to Compare