AOR vs CSQ

Comparison between ISHARES CORE 60/40 BALANCED ALLOCATION ETF (AOR, ETF) and Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceCSQ has outperformed AOR, delivering a return of +10.7% compared to +6.8%

AOR vs CSQ - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	AOR(ETF)	CSQ(ETF)
Net Assets	$3.70B	$3.70B
Expense Ratio	0.15%	N/A
Max Drawdown	24.96%	72.74%
Sharpe Ratio	1.25	1.07
5Y Beta	0.55	1.03
5Y Dividends CAGR	13.47%	4.89%

Net Assets

AOR

$3.70B

CSQ

$3.70B

Expense Ratio

AOR

0.15%

CSQ

N/A

Max Drawdown

Winner

AOR

24.96%

CSQ

72.74%

Sharpe Ratio

Winner

AOR

1.25

CSQ

1.07

5Y Beta

Winner

AOR

0.55

CSQ

1.03

5Y Dividends CAGR

Winner

AOR

13.47%

CSQ

4.89%

AOR vs CSQ - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	AOR	CSQ
1 month	-0.29%	+1.84%
3 months	+3.71%	+10.49%
6 months	+5.67%	+10.39%
1 year	+16.27%	+22.10%
5 years(CAGR)	+6.84%	+10.68%
10 years(CAGR)	+8.22%	+16.10%
Max(CAGR)	+8.74%	+10.22%

AOR

-0.29%

Winner

CSQ

+1.84%

AOR

+3.71%

Winner

CSQ

+10.49%

AOR

+5.67%

Winner

CSQ

+10.39%

AOR

+16.27%

Winner

CSQ

+22.10%

5Y(CAGR)

AOR

+6.84%

Winner

CSQ

+10.68%

10Y(CAGR)

AOR

+8.22%

Winner

CSQ

+16.10%

Max(CAGR)

AOR

+8.74%

Winner

CSQ

+10.22%

AOR vs CSQ - Annual Returns (2004 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	AOR	CSQ
2026	+7.08%	+12.11%
2025	+16.68%	+17.22%
2024	+11.47%	+29.40%
2023	+14.90%	+22.44%
2022	-15.79%	-24.06%
2021	+11.46%	+34.84%
2020	+10.74%	+25.88%
2019	+18.94%	+38.06%
2018	-6.24%	-4.03%
2017	+15.49%	+25.28%
2016	+7.82%	+16.51%
2015	-1.02%	-4.73%
2014	+7.24%	+14.95%
2013	+14.07%	+18.27%
2012	+10.41%	+26.53%
2011	+0.52%	-4.16%
2010	+9.79%	+12.12%
2009	+17.43%	+48.27%
2008	+4.43%	-48.59%
2007	N/A	-2.22%
2006	N/A	+23.71%
2005	N/A	+3.84%
2004	N/A	-3.64%

AOR vs CSQ Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for AOR was -24.44%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 177 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for CSQ was -67.02%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1214 trading sessions.

The current AOR drawdown is -0.39%.

Rank	AOR	CSQ
#1	-24.44% Nov 28, 2008 - Aug 13, 2009	-67.02% May 22, 2007 - Mar 15, 2012
#2	-22.95% Feb 12, 2020 - Aug 5, 2020	-48.11% Feb 20, 2020 - Aug 12, 2020
#3	-21.73% Nov 8, 2021 - Mar 1, 2024	-33.06% Dec 30, 2021 - Mar 20, 2024
#4	-13.45% Nov 13, 2008 - Nov 28, 2008	-29.03% Sep 24, 2018 - Apr 29, 2019
#5	-12.62% Apr 29, 2011 - Feb 3, 2012	-24.60% May 18, 2015 - Jul 15, 2016
#6	-12.28% Jan 26, 2018 - Apr 30, 2019	-24.18% Jan 23, 2025 - Jun 26, 2025
#7	-11.29% May 21, 2015 - Jul 27, 2016	-17.11% Apr 1, 2004 - Jul 8, 2005
#8	-9.77% Feb 18, 2025 - May 15, 2025	-15.25% Jan 12, 2026 - Apr 20, 2026
#9	-8.82% Apr 23, 2010 - Oct 5, 2010	-14.59% Aug 27, 2014 - Nov 14, 2014
#10	-6.64% Feb 25, 2026 - Apr 17, 2026	-12.20% Oct 17, 2012 - Jan 7, 2013
#11	-6.24% Apr 2, 2012 - Aug 16, 2012	-10.85% Jan 26, 2018 - Jun 1, 2018
#12	-6.06% Jan 14, 2010 - Mar 16, 2010	-9.91% Sep 2, 2020 - Nov 10, 2020
#13	-5.97% May 21, 2013 - Aug 2, 2013	-9.90% May 17, 2013 - Oct 25, 2013
#14	-5.32% Sep 5, 2014 - Nov 21, 2014	-9.75% Jul 10, 2024 - Sep 23, 2024
#15	-5.11% Sep 2, 2020 - Nov 9, 2020	-9.53% Apr 15, 2021 - Jun 29, 2021

Correlation

Correlation between AOR and CSQ is 0.99 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.99

-101

Dividend Comparison (2004 - 2026)

AOR vs CSQ dividend yield comparison.

Year	AOR	CSQ
2026	1.20%	3.62%
2025	2.54%	6.51%
2024	2.66%	6.95%
2023	2.50%	8.27%
2022	2.12%	9.17%
2021	1.64%	6.38%
2020	1.89%	7.03%
2019	2.56%	7.14%
2018	2.49%	9.35%
2017	4.51%	8.20%
2016	2.16%	9.64%
2015	2.12%	10.00%
2014	2.11%	8.44%
2013	1.92%	7.71%
2012	2.08%	8.56%
2011	2.42%	7.54%
2010	1.84%	6.80%
2009	2.07%	8.93%
2008	0.68%	18.36%
2007	0.00%	8.71%
2006	0.00%	7.48%
2005	0.00%	7.66%
2004	0.00%	4.28%