CSQ vs DNP

Comparison between Calamos Strategic Total Return Fund (CSQ, ETF) and DNP Select Income Fund Inc (DNP, ETF).

5-Year PerformanceCSQ has outperformed DNP, delivering a return of +10.7% compared to +9.0%

CSQ vs DNP - Performance Comparison

Log

Key Characteristics

Financial metrics and valuation ratios

Metric	CSQ(ETF)	DNP(ETF)
Net Assets	$3.70B	$3.80B
Max Drawdown	72.74%	54.78%
Sharpe Ratio	1.07	1.83
5Y Beta	1.03	0.36
5Y Dividends CAGR	4.89%	1.61%

Net Assets

CSQ

$3.70B

Winner

DNP

$3.80B

Max Drawdown

CSQ

72.74%

Winner

DNP

54.78%

Sharpe Ratio

CSQ

1.07

Winner

DNP

1.83

5Y Beta

CSQ

1.03

Winner

DNP

0.36

5Y Dividends CAGR

Winner

CSQ

4.89%

DNP

1.61%

CSQ vs DNP - Historical Returns

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Period	CSQ	DNP
1 month	+1.84%	+3.70%
3 months	+10.49%	+7.26%
6 months	+10.39%	+14.65%
1 year	+22.10%	+23.01%
5 years(CAGR)	+10.68%	+8.96%
10 years(CAGR)	+16.10%	+8.16%
Max(CAGR)	+10.22%	+8.20%

CSQ

+1.84%

Winner

DNP

+3.70%

Winner

CSQ

+10.49%

DNP

+7.26%

CSQ

+10.39%

Winner

DNP

+14.65%

CSQ

+22.10%

Winner

DNP

+23.01%

5Y(CAGR)

Winner

CSQ

+10.68%

DNP

+8.96%

10Y(CAGR)

Winner

CSQ

+16.10%

DNP

+8.16%

Max(CAGR)

Winner

CSQ

+10.22%

DNP

+8.20%

CSQ vs DNP - Annual Returns (1999 - 2026)

Returns include dividend reinvestment.

Year	CSQ	DNP
2026	+12.11%	+15.35%
2025	+17.22%	+21.06%
2024	+29.40%	+11.10%
2023	+22.44%	-19.12%
2022	-24.06%	+10.44%
2021	+34.84%	+15.85%
2020	+25.88%	-12.89%
2019	+38.06%	+30.75%
2018	-4.03%	+2.78%
2017	+25.28%	+12.29%
2016	+16.51%	+22.45%
2015	-4.73%	-6.64%
2014	+14.95%	+21.21%
2013	+18.27%	+6.54%
2012	+26.53%	-6.53%
2011	-4.16%	+30.42%
2010	+12.12%	+10.24%
2009	+48.27%	+47.10%
2008	-48.59%	-36.38%
2007	-2.22%	+5.95%
2006	+23.71%	+12.53%
2005	+3.84%	-4.94%
2004	-3.64%	+16.87%
2003	N/A	+18.70%
2002	N/A	-2.63%
2001	N/A	+11.91%
2000	N/A	+30.60%
1999	N/A	-13.63%

CSQ vs DNP Drawdown Comparison

The maximum drawdown for CSQ was -67.02%, occurring on Nov 20, 2008. Recovery took 1214 trading sessions.

The maximum drawdown for DNP was -48.54%, occurring on Mar 9, 2009. Recovery took 519 trading sessions.

The current DNP drawdown is -0.54%.

Rank	CSQ	DNP
#1	-67.02% May 22, 2007 - Mar 15, 2012	-48.54% Jun 4, 2008 - Jun 25, 2010
#2	-48.11% Feb 20, 2020 - Aug 12, 2020	-39.54% Feb 11, 2020 - Mar 2, 2022
#3	-33.06% Dec 30, 2021 - Mar 20, 2024	-25.97% Apr 24, 2002 - May 23, 2003
#4	-29.03% Sep 24, 2018 - Apr 29, 2019	-24.30% Jan 13, 2023 - Mar 28, 2025
#5	-24.60% May 18, 2015 - Jul 15, 2016	-21.51% Jul 23, 2012 - May 13, 2014
#6	-24.18% Jan 23, 2025 - Jun 26, 2025	-16.01% May 28, 2015 - Apr 11, 2016
#7	-17.11% Apr 1, 2004 - Jul 8, 2005	-15.29% Nov 5, 1999 - Aug 7, 2000
#8	-15.25% Jan 12, 2026 - Apr 20, 2026	-14.39% Apr 28, 2022 - Jan 10, 2023
#9	-14.59% Aug 27, 2014 - Nov 14, 2014	-13.40% Mar 31, 2004 - Aug 27, 2004
#10	-12.20% Oct 17, 2012 - Jan 7, 2013	-12.04% Oct 3, 2005 - Oct 9, 2006
#11	-10.85% Jan 26, 2018 - Jun 1, 2018	-11.86% Mar 2, 2005 - Jun 24, 2005
#12	-9.91% Sep 2, 2020 - Nov 10, 2020	-11.71% Oct 11, 2017 - May 25, 2018
#13	-9.90% May 17, 2013 - Oct 25, 2013	-11.20% Jul 11, 2011 - Sep 15, 2011
#14	-9.75% Jul 10, 2024 - Sep 23, 2024	-10.42% Feb 24, 2012 - Jun 18, 2012
#15	-9.53% Apr 15, 2021 - Jun 29, 2021	-10.33% Nov 10, 2010 - May 10, 2011

Correlation

Correlation between CSQ and DNP is 0.94 which considered as a very strong positive correlation - the stocks move almost identically together.

0.94

-101

Dividend Comparison (2000 - 2026)

CSQ vs DNP dividend yield comparison.

Year	CSQ	DNP
2026	3.62%	3.53%
2025	6.51%	7.81%
2024	6.95%	8.84%
2023	8.27%	9.20%
2022	9.17%	6.93%
2021	6.38%	7.18%
2020	7.03%	7.60%
2019	7.14%	6.11%
2018	9.35%	7.50%
2017	8.20%	7.22%
2016	9.64%	7.62%
2015	10.00%	8.71%
2014	8.44%	7.39%
2013	7.71%	8.28%
2012	8.56%	7.55%
2011	7.54%	7.14%
2010	6.80%	8.53%
2009	8.93%	8.72%
2008	18.36%	12.68%
2007	8.71%	7.37%
2006	7.48%	7.21%
2005	7.66%	7.56%
2004	4.28%	6.67%
2003	0.00%	7.25%
2002	0.00%	8.08%
2001	0.00%	7.14%
2000	0.00%	3.19%